Skip to content

Comparison of the Effects of Metformin and Pioglitazone on Liver Enzymes and Ultrasound Changes in Non-Diabetic Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver

Comparison of the Effects of Metformin and Pioglitazone on Liver Enzymes

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05521633
Enrollment
96
Registered
2022-08-30
Start date
2019-06-06
Completion date
2022-05-24
Last updated
2022-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

NAFLD

Brief summary

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a spectrum of hepatic disease ranging from fat accumulation in liver to fibrosis and cirrhosis. It affects 25% of the world population on average. Objective of this study is to compare the effect of metformin (1000 milligrams daily) versus pioglitazone (30 milligrams daily) in improving liver transaminases and ultrasound changes in non-diabetic patients of NAFLD when given for six months. METHODS: A Quasi-experimental study was conducted in Mayo Hospital Lahore from October 2019 to November 2020.Out of 96 half Patients were assigned randomly to Group-A (metformin) or Group-B (pioglitazone). Demographic history, abdominal ultrasound & liver enzymes were recorded on Proforma monthly till 6 months. Data was put into and analyzed by SPSS version 26; t-test was used to compare the mean liver transaminases between the two groups. Ultrasound findings were compared by Chi square. The P value of less than 0.05 was counted as significant.

Interventions

DRUGMetformin and Pioglitazone

Every participant in Group-A took tablet metformin 500 mg daily and every participant in Group-B took tablet pioglitazone 30 mg daily.

Sponsors

King Edward Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Gender: Both male and female 2. Age: 18-80 Years 3. Ultrasound evidence of fatty liver as per operational definition 4. Liver enzymes as per operational definition

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy 2. Cirrhotic patients as per operational definition 3. Chronic Hepatitis B or chronic hepatitis C 4. Patients taking long term steroids, highly active antiretroviral therapy, diltiazem, irinotecan, oxaliplatin and amiodarone 5. Patients taking alcohol (based on history and AST to ALT ratio) 6. Patients with heart failure (NYHA Classification class III or IV status: patients comfortable at rest but less than ordinary physical activity causes undue fatigue, dyspnea or palpitations) 7. Patients with renal failure (serum creatinine ≥ 1.4 mg% or eGFR \< 45 ml/min/1.73 m2)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Liver transaminase levelsThe comparison is done after 6 months of drug treatmentThere should be a 22% or more change in transaminases levels from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fatty Liver GradeThe comparison is done after 6 months of drug treatmentThere should be a change of liver fat content determined by ultrasound as Fatty Liver Grade

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026