Skip to content

Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation for Postoperative Analgesia

Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation for Postoperative Analgesia: A Randomized, Participant- and Observer-Masked, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05521516
Enrollment
122
Registered
2022-08-30
Start date
2022-10-12
Completion date
2024-12-11
Last updated
2025-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Pain, Acute

Brief summary

The moderate-to-severe pain many patients experience following surgery is often treated with opioids, which are associated with side effects such as nausea/vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression (and a risk of abuse, dependence, and diversion). Potent site-specific analgesia with fewer side effects may be provided with peripheral nerve blocks. However, these too have limitations such as a duration of action measured in hours, while the pain from surgery is usually measured in days or weeks. Peripheral nerve stimulation or neuromodulation is an alternative method of pain control involving the introduction of electrical current to stimulate various nerves that do not carry pain sensations, but which then decreases communication between pain fibers and the spinal cord and/or brain. Placing small electrodes specifically in the area of the ear is called auricular neuromodulation and is theorized to function by stimulating various cranial and peripheral nerves that influence a part of the brain called the limbic system which is involved with many aspects of behavior including responses to stress. A device that delivers auricular neuromodulation, the Bridge system, is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for use to reduce symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal for up to 5 days. However, one prospective and two published retrospective studies suggest that it may provide postoperative analgesia as well. The device itself is relatively simple to apply; has few contraindications, side effects, or adverse events; and has no potential for dependence, abuse, or diversion. Therefore, it has the potential to concurrently improve analgesia and decrease or even negate opioid requirements following surgery, only without the limitations of opioids and peripheral nerve blocks. The purpose of this pilot study is to explore the possibility of treating postoperative pain with percutaneous auricular neuromodulation, optimize the study protocol, and estimate the treatment effect in preparation for developing a subsequent definitive clinical trial.

Detailed description

The proposed study will be a randomized, participant- and observer-masked, sham-controlled, parallel-arm, human participants pilot study with two primary aims: Specific Aim 1: To determine the feasibility and optimize the protocol for a subsequent clinical trial that will compare the addition of percutaneous auricular neuromodulation to usual and customary analgesia following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures. Specific Aim 2: To estimate the treatment effect of adding percutaneous auricular neuromodulation to usual and customary analgesia on pain and opioid consumption following various surgical procedures. This will provide an idea of the optimal surgical procedures amenable to this analgesic technique and allow determination of the required sample size of a subsequent definitive clinical trial. Hypothesis 1: Auricular neuromodulation decreases pain in the 5 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures currently treated with a single-injection peripheral nerve block. Hypothesis 2: Auricular neuromodulation decreases opioid use in the 5 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures currently treated with a single-injection peripheral nerve block. This will be a single-center (UCSD), randomized, participant- and observer-masked, sham-controlled, parallel-arm human participants pilot study. Enrollment. Participants will be consenting adults undergoing various surgical procedures usually resulting in moderate-to-severe postoperative pain and treated with single-injection peripheral nerve blocks. Study inclusion will be proposed to eligible patients prior to surgery. If a patient desires study participation, written, informed consent will be obtained using a current UCSD IRB-approved ICF. The study population of interest includes women and men of all races, ethnicity, sexual identity, and socioeconomic status. Preoperative Procedures. Following written, informed consent, the investigators will record baseline anthropometric information (age, sex, height, weight, current pain level). Participants will have their single-injection peripheral nerve block administered using ropivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine (standard at the enrolling institution) prior to undergoing their surgical procedure per standard of care. A successful regional block will be defined as sensory- and motor-block onset in all expected nerve distributions within the 30 minutes following the local anesthetic injection. Participants with a successful regional block and undergo the anticipated surgical procedure will be randomized and continue within the study. Treatment Group Assignment. Each participant will be randomized to one of two treatment groups: Active (Experimental) or Sham treatment. There are sham devices produced that are identical to active devices, only they do not deliver electrical current. Randomization will be stratified by surgical procedure, in block sizes of 2. The computer-generated randomization list will be created by the University of California San Diego Investigational Drug Service in a 1:1 treatment group ratio assigned only after successful peripheral nerve block administration and the participant underwent the anticipated surgical procedure. The active and sham stimulators are indistinguishable in appearance, and therefore investigators, participants, and all clinical staff other than the individual who opens the randomization envelope and chooses a sham or active device will be masked to treatment group assignment for the duration of the data collection period. Study intervention. The NSS-2 Bridge device will be affixed to the ear and activated prior to discharge from the recovery room (Experimental). There is currently no consensus regarding the placement on the ipsilateral or contralateral ear relative to the surgical procedure (if sided). Therefore, the investigators will apply the device to the side that the participant sleeps on least, to optimize comfort in bed and sleep. Postoperative course. In addition to the experimental device and single-injection peripheral nerve block, participants will receive standard-of-care oral and intravenous postoperative analgesics which can include acetaminophen, ibuprofen, ketorolac, and opioids (this is surgeon- and patient-dependent). Therefore, all patients of this study-regardless of the treatment arm they are randomized to-will continue to receive current usual and customary analgesia: all will receive the same combination of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, ketorolac, opioids, and a single-injection peripheral nerve block as they would regardless of study participation. Prior to discharge, participants and their caretakers will be provided with verbal instructions regarding the care of the stimulator, and the telephone and pager numbers of an investigator available at all times during the first 5 days of treatment. The instructions for the stimulator are few: (1) participants can shower, but use a shower cap to cover the stimulator; (2) there are no controls so there is nothing that needs to be adjusted; (3) the device will run out of power after 5 days; (4) the investigators will call participants every day to answer any questions participants might have and describe how to remove the device as that time approaches. Participants will be discharged when ready, as determined by standard criteria by the masked surgical service. Participants will be discharged home with their NSS-2 Bridge in situ and a prescription for immediate-release oral opioid, preferably oxycodone 5 mg tablets, taken for breakthrough pain. Participants will be contacted by telephone for end point collection beginning on postoperative day 1. The NSS-2 Bridge devices will be removed by patients or their caretakers at home on postoperative day 5. Similar to perineural catheters, this procedure encompasses simply removing the small dressings (the electrodes remain adhered to the dressings and therefore do not require a separate extraction step), removing the stimulator from behind the ear with simple traction, and discarding all components (these are disposable, single-use devices). At the conclusion of the study, participants will be informed of the main results in lay-person language by either email or the U.S. Postal Service. Study outcomes: This is an exploratory pilot study to assist in planning a subsequent definitive trial and the investigators therefore have no data analysis plan. The investigators will enroll convenience samples for each of the surgical procedures of up to 30 participants for each procedure and anticipate analyzing some surgical procedure separately from the others (hips, knees, breast, hernia/cholecystectomy, septoplasty). The two primary outcomes will be (1) the mean of the average pain recorded on postoperative days 1-5 measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (average pain is included in the Brief Pain Inventory pain domain); and (2) the cumulative opioids consumed from recovery room discharge until postoperative day 5, as measured in oral oxycodone equivalents.

Interventions

DEVICEActive Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge

Application of 5 days of percutaneous auricular neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge device

DEVICESham Treatment

Application of 5 days of a nonfunctional sham device

Sponsors

University of California, San Diego
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The Investigational Drug Service will create the randomization tables and provide the investigators with the appropriate device (active or sham), leaving all participants, investigators, and the statistician masked to treatment group assignment.

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment: Randomized, Triple-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Arm Human Subjects Clinical Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. undergoing one of these surgical procedures as a primary procedure (not revision): 1. septoplasty \[infraorbital nerve block\] 2. laparoscopic cholecystectomy \[transversus abdominis nerve block\] 3. laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy \[transversus abdominis nerve block\] 4. non-mastectomy breast surgery \[paravertebral nerve block\] 5. percutaneous nephrolithotomy \[erector spinae plane nerve block\] 6. inguinal hernia repair \[transversus abdominis nerve block\] 7. knee arthroplasty \[adductor canal nerve block\] 8. hip arthroplasty \[pericapsular nerve group block\] 9. shoulder acromioclavicular joint repair, labral repair, subacromial decompression, or Bankart repair (without rotator cuff repair) \[interscalene nerve block\] 10. orthopedic hardware removal anticipated to be at least moderately painful postoperatively \[various peripheral nerve blocks\] 2. analgesic plan includes a single-injection peripheral nerve block with a long-acting local anesthetic \[may be waived for hip arthroplasty\] 3. age 18 years or older.

Exclusion criteria

1. concurrent use of another electric stimulator (e.g., cardiac pacemaker) 2. bleeding disorder 3. anticoagulation 4. skin abnormality at the treatment site 5. psoriasis vulgaris 6. morbid obesity as defined by a body mass index \> 40 7. history of opioid abuse 8. inability to communicate with the investigators or hospital staff 9. pregnancy 10. bilateral or multi-stage surgical procedures 11. incarceration 12. chronic opioid or tramadol use (daily use within the 2 weeks prior to surgery and duration of use \> 4 weeks) 13. neuro-muscular deficit of the surgical area/limb.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale First 5 Postoperative DaysThe first 5 postoperative daysThe numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale. The outcome will the mean value of daily average pain scores measured with the Numeric Rating Scale. The primary outcome measure will be the mean value of the average daily pain measured on postoperative days 1-5.
Total OPIOID Consumption From Recovery Room Discharge Until the Data Collection Phone Call on Postoperative Day 5 (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Postoperative days 0-5Total opioid consumption from recovery room discharge until the data collection phone call on postoperative day 5 (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
LEAST (Lowest or Minimum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleRecorded on postoperative days 2, 4, 6, and 8 for the previous 24-hour periodThe numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
CURRENT Pain at the Time of the Data-collection Phone Call Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleRecorded on postoperative days 2, 4, 6, and 8The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Recorded on postoperative days 1-8Opioid consumption of the previous 24 hours (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents)
Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)Recorded on postoperative days 2, 4, 6, and 8 for the previous 24-hour periodThe interference sub scale of the Brief Pain Inventory short form is an instrument specifically designed to assess pain's impact on physical and emotional functioning. It is comprised of 7 questions involving physical and emotional functioning using a 0-10 Likert scale \[0=no interference, good;10=complete interference, bad\]: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep and enjoyment of life. The responses for these 7 questions are summed, resulting in a final scale of 0 (no interference=good) to 70 (complete interference=bad).
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleRecorded on postoperative days 1-8 for the previous 24-hour periodThe numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
MaskingRecorded on postoperative day 1Patient queried if they thought they received active stimulation (entered as 1), a sham device (entered as 0), or are not sure (entered as 0.5)
Hospitalization Duration Measured in DaysUp to 2 weeks after surgeryDay relative to the day of surgery that patient was discharged from the hospital (e.g., same day is postoperative day 0, while the day following surgery is postoperative day 1)
Tourniquet DurationIntraoperative (within the operating room)Number of minutes the tourniquet was inflated
Surgical DurationIntraoperative (within the operating room)The time from surgical start to surgical stop measured in minutes and hours
Awakenings Due to PainRecorded on postoperative days 1-8 for the previous nightThe number of times the participant awoke the previous night due to pain
WORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleRecorded on postoperative days 1-8 for the previous 24-hour periodThe numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 Bridge
Application of 5 days of percutaneous auricular Neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge device Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge: Application of 5 days of percutaneous auricular neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge device
60
Sham Treatment
Application of 5 days of a nonfunctional sham device Sham Treatment: Application of 5 days of a nonfunctional sham device
60
Total120

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeSham TreatmentTotal
Age, Continuous61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
Body Mass Index27 kg / m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
27 kg / m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
27 kg / m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
Height170 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
170 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
170 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
60 participants60 participants120 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants33 Participants65 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants27 Participants55 Participants
Weight79 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
78 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
78 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 600 / 60
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 600 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 600 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale First 5 Postoperative Days

The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale. The outcome will the mean value of daily average pain scores measured with the Numeric Rating Scale. The primary outcome measure will be the mean value of the average daily pain measured on postoperative days 1-5.

Time frame: The first 5 postoperative days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale First 5 Postoperative Days1 units on a scale
Sham TreatmentAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale First 5 Postoperative Days3 units on a scale
Primary

Total OPIOID Consumption From Recovery Room Discharge Until the Data Collection Phone Call on Postoperative Day 5 (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)

Total opioid consumption from recovery room discharge until the data collection phone call on postoperative day 5 (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents).

Time frame: Postoperative days 0-5

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeTotal OPIOID Consumption From Recovery Room Discharge Until the Data Collection Phone Call on Postoperative Day 5 (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)5 mg
Sham TreatmentTotal OPIOID Consumption From Recovery Room Discharge Until the Data Collection Phone Call on Postoperative Day 5 (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)17.5 mg
Secondary

AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

Time frame: Recorded on postoperative days 1-8 for the previous 24-hour period

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 12.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 21.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 31.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 41.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 51.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 61.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 71.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 81.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Sham TreatmentAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 81.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Sham TreatmentAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 12.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Sham TreatmentAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 52.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Sham TreatmentAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 23.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Sham TreatmentAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 72.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Sham TreatmentAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Sham TreatmentAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 62.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Sham TreatmentAVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 42.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

Awakenings Due to Pain

The number of times the participant awoke the previous night due to pain

Time frame: Recorded on postoperative days 1-8 for the previous night

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAwakenings Due to PainDay 10 number of awakenings
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAwakenings Due to PainDay 20 number of awakenings
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAwakenings Due to PainDay 30 number of awakenings
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAwakenings Due to PainDay 40. number of awakenings
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAwakenings Due to PainDay 50 number of awakenings
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAwakenings Due to PainDay 60 number of awakenings
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAwakenings Due to PainDay 70 number of awakenings
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeAwakenings Due to PainDay 80 number of awakenings
Sham TreatmentAwakenings Due to PainDay 80 number of awakenings
Sham TreatmentAwakenings Due to PainDay 10 number of awakenings
Sham TreatmentAwakenings Due to PainDay 50 number of awakenings
Sham TreatmentAwakenings Due to PainDay 20 number of awakenings
Sham TreatmentAwakenings Due to PainDay 70 number of awakenings
Sham TreatmentAwakenings Due to PainDay 30 number of awakenings
Sham TreatmentAwakenings Due to PainDay 60 number of awakenings
Sham TreatmentAwakenings Due to PainDay 40 number of awakenings
Secondary

Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)

The interference sub scale of the Brief Pain Inventory short form is an instrument specifically designed to assess pain's impact on physical and emotional functioning. It is comprised of 7 questions involving physical and emotional functioning using a 0-10 Likert scale \[0=no interference, good;10=complete interference, bad\]: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep and enjoyment of life. The responses for these 7 questions are summed, resulting in a final scale of 0 (no interference=good) to 70 (complete interference=bad).

Time frame: Recorded on postoperative days 2, 4, 6, and 8 for the previous 24-hour period

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeBrief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)Day 214 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeBrief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)Day 411 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeBrief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)Day 612 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeBrief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)Day 89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Sham TreatmentBrief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)Day 813 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Sham TreatmentBrief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)Day 223 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Sham TreatmentBrief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)Day 617 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Sham TreatmentBrief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)Day 418 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Secondary

CURRENT Pain at the Time of the Data-collection Phone Call Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

Time frame: Recorded on postoperative days 2, 4, 6, and 8

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeCURRENT Pain at the Time of the Data-collection Phone Call Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 21.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeCURRENT Pain at the Time of the Data-collection Phone Call Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 41.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeCURRENT Pain at the Time of the Data-collection Phone Call Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 61.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeCURRENT Pain at the Time of the Data-collection Phone Call Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 81.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Sham TreatmentCURRENT Pain at the Time of the Data-collection Phone Call Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 81.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Sham TreatmentCURRENT Pain at the Time of the Data-collection Phone Call Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Sham TreatmentCURRENT Pain at the Time of the Data-collection Phone Call Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 61.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Sham TreatmentCURRENT Pain at the Time of the Data-collection Phone Call Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Hospitalization Duration Measured in Days

Day relative to the day of surgery that patient was discharged from the hospital (e.g., same day is postoperative day 0, while the day following surgery is postoperative day 1)

Time frame: Up to 2 weeks after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeHospitalization Duration Measured in Days.2 DaysStandard Deviation 0.5
Sham TreatmentHospitalization Duration Measured in Days.5 DaysStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

LEAST (Lowest or Minimum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

Time frame: Recorded on postoperative days 2, 4, 6, and 8 for the previous 24-hour period

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeLEAST (Lowest or Minimum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeLEAST (Lowest or Minimum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 4.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeLEAST (Lowest or Minimum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeLEAST (Lowest or Minimum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 8.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Sham TreatmentLEAST (Lowest or Minimum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Sham TreatmentLEAST (Lowest or Minimum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 21.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Sham TreatmentLEAST (Lowest or Minimum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 61.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Sham TreatmentLEAST (Lowest or Minimum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 41.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Secondary

Masking

Patient queried if they thought they received active stimulation (entered as 1), a sham device (entered as 0), or are not sure (entered as 0.5)

Time frame: Recorded on postoperative day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeMasking.5 score on a scale
Sham TreatmentMasking.5 score on a scale
Secondary

Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)

Opioid consumption of the previous 24 hours (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents)

Time frame: Recorded on postoperative days 1-8

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeOpioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Day 14.5 mgStandard Deviation 8
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeOpioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Day 26 mgStandard Deviation 10
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeOpioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Day 35 mgStandard Deviation 10
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeOpioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Day 44 mgStandard Deviation 7.5
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeOpioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Day 53 mgStandard Deviation 5.5
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeOpioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Day 62.5 mgStandard Deviation 6
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeOpioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Day 73 mgStandard Deviation 6.5
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeOpioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Day 83.5 mgStandard Deviation 8
Sham TreatmentOpioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Day 84 mgStandard Deviation 8
Sham TreatmentOpioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Day 18 mgStandard Deviation 11.5
Sham TreatmentOpioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Day 57 mgStandard Deviation 11.5
Sham TreatmentOpioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Day 28 mgStandard Deviation 12
Sham TreatmentOpioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Day 74 mgStandard Deviation 9
Sham TreatmentOpioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Day 38 mgStandard Deviation 12
Sham TreatmentOpioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Day 65 mgStandard Deviation 9
Sham TreatmentOpioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)Day 47.5 mgStandard Deviation 12.5
Secondary

Surgical Duration

The time from surgical start to surgical stop measured in minutes and hours

Time frame: Intraoperative (within the operating room)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeSurgical Duration92.4 minutesStandard Deviation 41.5
Sham TreatmentSurgical Duration89.3 minutesStandard Deviation 35.9
Secondary

Tourniquet Duration

Number of minutes the tourniquet was inflated

Time frame: Intraoperative (within the operating room)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeTourniquet Duration.8 MinutesStandard Deviation 4.4
Sham TreatmentTourniquet Duration1.8 MinutesStandard Deviation 9.5
Secondary

WORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

Time frame: Recorded on postoperative days 1-8 for the previous 24-hour period

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeWORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 14.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeWORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeWORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 33.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeWORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeWORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 53.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeWORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 63.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeWORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation With NSS-2 BridgeWORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 82.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Sham TreatmentWORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 83.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Sham TreatmentWORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 14.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Sham TreatmentWORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 54.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Sham TreatmentWORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 25.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Sham TreatmentWORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 73.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Sham TreatmentWORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 34.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Sham TreatmentWORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Sham TreatmentWORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating ScaleDay 44.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026