Skip to content

Short-term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy in Serious Physical Illness

ORPHYS - Short-term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy in Serious Physical Illness

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05520281
Acronym
ORPHYS
Enrollment
24
Registered
2022-08-29
Start date
2022-09-15
Completion date
2025-08-06
Last updated
2025-12-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Malignant Neoplasm, Palliative Care

Keywords

Advanced Cancer, Death anxiety, Demoralization, Existential distress, Mental disorders

Brief summary

Life-threatening physical illness may powerfully re-activate existential conflict. There is little evidence to date on the effectiveness of relationship-focused therapies in this patient group.The aim of this study is to pilot a psychodynamic treatment for patients with advanced cancer and high psychological distress.

Detailed description

Severely physically ill patients may experience existential distress symptoms including helplessness, hopelessness, death anxiety, perceived burdensomeness and a sense of pointlessness. The latter can significantly interfere with end-of-life care processes and outcomes (receipt of treatment according to preferences, expression of desire for hastened death). So far, empirically tested psychotherapeutic programs in advanced life-threatening illness have predominantly been ultra-short and applied supportive and resource-oriented techniques. Psychodynamic treatment allows to address clinically significant existential distress through its conceptualization from early relational life experiences. The aim of this study is to pilot a psychodynamic treatment for patients with advanced cancer and high psychological distress.The inverstigators will 1. analyse the feasibility of the treatment, and 2. investigate changes in process- and patient-relevant outcomes over the course of the treatment The inverstigators will conduct a single-group pre-post study with five assessment points in which 50 adult patients diagnosed with advanced cancer will receive a manualized psychodynamic short-term therapy. Target parameters are assessed by diagnostic interviews, focus interviews, self-assessment questionnaires as well as electronic patient records. For research objective b) the investigators will compare the intervention group with a matched comparison group of a longitudinal cohort sample (NCT04600206). Matching will be based on stress level, demographic, and medical parameters across the 5 assessment points.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALShort-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for patients with serious physical illness (ORPHYS)

A short-term psychodynamic therapy that focuses on the special inner and outer situation of patients with a serious physical illness, especially with regard to the importance of relationships in a limited lifetime.

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Pre-Post Design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years and older * UICC stage IV solid tumor * Informed consent * Current physical condition that allows for at least 12 therapy sessions * Indication: Presence of a mental disorder with existential stress and limitations in coping capacity

Exclusion criteria

* Acute suicidality * Psychotic disorder (ICD-10: F2 diagnosis) * Substance dependence or abuse (ICD-10: F1 diagnosis) * Structural deficits that interfere with attending to regular appointments * Other psychotherapeutic treatment * Severe cognitive impairment * Severe physical impairment * Insufficient German to give informed consent and complete self-report questionnaires

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment feasibilitythrough study completion, an average of 6 monthsWill be assessed via semi-structured qualitative interviews.
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and Tolerability)up to 12-months follow-upWill be assessed via Inventory for the Balanced Assessment of Negative Effects of Psychotherapy (INEP, Ladwig, Rief & Nestoriuc, 2014).
Acceptancethrough study completion, an average of 6 monthsWill be assessed via drop-out rates (number of patients not completing at least 12 sessions) and treatment compliance (number of sessions missed).
Treatment adherencethrough study completion, an average of 6 monthsWill be assessed via qualitative analysis of therapeutic session protocols and audio recordings.
Therapeutic competencethrough study completion, an average of 6 monthsWill be assessed via qualitative analysis of supervision protocols.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Interpersonal problemsBaseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months follow upWill be assessed via inventory for assessment of interpersonal problems (IIP-D-32, Thomas, Brähler & Strauß, 2011).
Therapeutic processthrough study completion, an average of 6 monthsWill be assessed via semi-structured qualitative interviews.
Therapeutic alliance II3-, 6- 9- and 12-months follow-upWill be assessed via Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ, Luborsky et al., 1996) (IIP-D-32, Thomas, Brähler & Strauß, 2011) for patients and therapists.
Therapeutic alliance I3-, 6- 9- and 12-months follow-upWill be assessed via California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales (CALPAS, Marmar & Gaston, 1989) for patients and therapists.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dignity related distressBaseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-upWill be assessed using the Sense of Dignity Item (SDI, Chochinov et al., 2002) and the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI, Chochinov, 2008).
Meaningfulness in life and crisis of meaningBaseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-upWill be assessed using the Sources of Meaning and Meaning in Life Questionnaire (SoMe, Schnell, 2009).
Desire for hastened deathBaseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-upWill be assessed using the short form of the Schedule of Attitudes Toward Hastened Death (SAHD-A, Kolva et al., 2017).
Coping resourcesBaseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-upWill be assessed using subscales (coping competence, adaptability) of the questionnaire for patient competence in coping with cancer (PCQ, Aderhold et al., 2019).
Need for and utilisation of psychosocial support for existential distressBaseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-upWill be assessed using the Structured questionnaire of psychosocial support needs for existential distress.
Quality of life at the end of lifeBaseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-upWill be assessed using a subscale (Life completion) of the Quality of Life at the End of Life-Cancer-Psychosocial Questionnaire (Qual-EC-P).
Suicidal ideationBaseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-upWill be assessed using the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS, Kliem & Brähler, 2015).
Coping and Demoralisationa) Baseline and 6-months follow-up, b) Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-upWill be assessed using the a) Structured Interview for Psychological Adjustment and Demoralisation (Bobevski & Kissane, 2019) and b) Demoralisation Scale-II (DS-II, Robinson et al., 2016).
Prevalence of adjustment disorderBaseline and 6-months follow-upWill be assessed according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) using the Adjustment Disorder Module of the CIDI (Composite International Diagnostic Interview, (Perkonigg et al., 2018).
Aggressiveness of care4 weeks prior to deathWill be assessed according to the criteria by Earle et al., 2003: receipt of chemotherapy in the last two weeks of life, emergency hospital admissions or intensive-care treatment during the last month of life. Will be obtained from medical chart reviews for deceased patients.
Prevalence of affective and anxiety disordersBaseline and 6-months follow-upWill be assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (SCID-5, Beesdo-Baum et al., 2019).
Death AnxietyBaseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-upWill be assessed using the Death Anxiety and Distress Scale (DADDS, Krause etal., 2015).
Perceived RelatednessBaseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-upWill be assessed using Subscales (Dependence, Relatedness) of the Depressive Experience Questionnaire (DEQ, Blatt, D'Afflitti & Quinlan, 1976; Blatt et al., 1982).
End-of-life preparation and adaptionBaseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-upWill be assessed using the Revised Loss Orientation and Life Engagement in Advanced Cancer Scale (LOLES, Vehling et al., 2018).

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026