Skip to content

A Retrospective, Observational, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of POLYSITE® and SEESITE® Implantable Ports

A Retrospective, Observational, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of POLYSITE® and SEESITE® Implantable Ports

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05519761
Enrollment
250
Registered
2022-08-29
Start date
2022-03-15
Completion date
2022-10-30
Last updated
2022-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Antibiotics, Antiviral Drugs, Blood Derivatives Transfusion, Blood Transfusion, Chemotherapy, Parenteral Nutrition, PMCF Study, Veinous

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate performance and safety of POLYSITE® and SEESITE® implantable ports allowing repeated and prolonged access to the venous system for the administration of chemotherapy, antibiotics, antiviral drugs, parenteral nutrition, and for blood transfusion or blood derivatives transfusion.

Interventions

DEVICEImplantation of veinous access ports

The surgeon, anaesthetist and interventional radiologist should be thoroughly familiar with the surgical procedure, instruments, and device characteristics prior to performing the implantation. The nurse has also to be familiar with the implantable port since he/she intervenes in it at the time of the Huber needle puncture and solution injection.

Sponsors

Eclevar Medtech
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Perouse Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL

Inclusion criteria

* Adult and paediatric population * Patient who received the implantation of any POLYSITE® or SEESITE® implantable port referenced in the Annex 1 of the current protocol between 1-JAN-2018 and 31-DEC-2020

Exclusion criteria

* Patient who refused the data collection according to GDPR regulation applicable in France * Patient who received the implantation of another device than those presented in Annex 1 of the current protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Associate Performance : correct device insertion assess Clinical endpointPeri-procedurepercentage of patients with correct placement objectively assessed by clinical observation
Performance : success of the insertion and placement of the implantable port.Peri-procedureevaluation of the success of the insertion and placement of the implantable port.
Associate Performance : correct device insertion assess by Radiological endpointPeri-procedurepercentage of patients with correct insertion into venous access objectively assessed via radiography, ECG or echography measurement
Per-procedure Safety30 Daysevaluation of the safety of the implantable ports
Associated Safety : rate of complications30 daysmeasurement of the rate of complications reported during the short-term period of 30 days after the implantation date. As example, the following short-term complications will be looked at: infections, bleeding and hematoma, pneumothorax, hemothorax and pleural effusion, pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety Long Term period: complications5 yearsmeasurement of the rate of complications reported during the whole study and at the defined study timepoints. As example, the following long-term complications will be looked at: infections, inflammation, skin disorders, catheter-related venous thrombosis, pinch-off.
Performance : evaluation of the device performance5 yearspercentage of patients with correct device insertion by the general surgeon, anaesthetist, or the radiologist. The insertion could be done under Echo or under fluoroscopy or ECG
Emergent Risks5 yearsAEs collection
device failure5 yearsmeasurement of the rate of device failure throughout the study until the device is removed from the patient's body. The device failures are defined as mechanical dysfunctions (catheter fracture, occlusion, and port-pocket dehiscence, pinch-off, embolization, leak, port/catheter disconnection, drug extravasation, mal-position, flip-over, migration, local venous thrombosis, etc…).
Safety: perioperative time5 yearsduration between the implantation procedure and the first use of the implantable port
Safety FU period: Device Failure Removal5 yearsthe complications will be followed up to 30 days after the implantable port removal. If the removal is related to a device failure or a complication related to the device, the patient's safety will be followed until the resolution of the complication.the complications will be followed up to 30 days after the implantable port removal. If the removal is related to a device failure or a complication related to the device, the patient's safety will be followed until the resolution of the complication.
Safety Long Term period: Device Failure Removal5 yearsthe complications will be followed up to 30 days after the implantable duration starting after the first 30 days after the implantation procedure and up to device removal, or patient death, or lost to follow-up, depending on what event comes first in the patient's medical chart. Study timepoints have been defined as 6-months Follow-up after the Implantation procedure, 12-months Follow-up after the Implantation procedure, 24-months Followup after the Implantation procedure and 36-months Follow-up after the Implantation procedure.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactChems Hachani, CEO
chachani@eclevar.com33 699150368

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026