Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of PDT vs RFA vs PDT+RFA for the Treatment of Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Clinical Effect and Safety of Photodynamic Therapy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Photodynamic Therapy Plus Radiofrequency Ablation for Unresectable Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05519319
Enrollment
70
Registered
2022-08-29
Start date
2023-01-01
Completion date
2026-06-01
Last updated
2023-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, Bile Duct Cancer

Keywords

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, Photodynamic therapy, Radiofrequency ablation

Brief summary

A median survival period of 3 to 6 months is the prognosis for patients with advanced, unresectable EHCC. For patients with locally advanced, unresectable EHCC, effective management of tumor growth is the only option to increase stent patency and survival time. In patients with cholangiocarcinoma, photodynamic therapy (PDT) is therapy that has been shown to improve stent patency and overall survival (OS). Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been demonstrated in numerous studies to prolong the life spans of individuals with malignant biliary obstruction . In the literature, comparing the clinical efficacy and adverse outcomes of these two endoscopic procedures is rare.

Detailed description

The lower common bile duct and the hepatic hilar area are the origin of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC). Patients with advanced, unresectable EHCC have a relatively poor prognosis, with a median survival time of 3 to 6 months. The only way to prolong stent patency and survival for patients with unresectable locally advanced EHCC is by active control of tumor development. The only treatment that has consistently demonstrated an improvement in stent patency and overall survival (OS) in cholangiocarcinoma patients is photodynamic therapy (PDT). The popularity of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has grown recently in an effort to increase stent patency and survival time for patients with malignant biliary obstruction.RFA for biliary cholangiocarcinoma has demonstrated safety and effectiveness. Endoscopic RFA has been shown in various studies to prolong stent patency and the survival of patients with malignant biliary obstruction. The clinical effectiveness and adverse events of these two endoscopic treatments have not been compared in many papers.

Interventions

PROCEDURERFA

RFA will be performed

PROCEDUREPDT

PDT will be performed

PROCEDURERFA combined with PDT

RFA and PDT will be performed

Sponsors

First People's Hospital of Hangzhou
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome Assessor are unaware about the results

Intervention model description

Three parallel groups

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically or cytologically confirmed cholangiocarcinoma; * unresectable cholangiocarcinoma due to local infiltration of major vessels according to computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), or endoscopic ultrasound(EUS); * No previous treatment; * Adequate bone marrow and organ function (white blood cells\>4.0×109/L, hemoglobin\>90 g/L, and platelets\>75×109/L, serum creatinine\<2.0 mg/dl); * A Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score ≥ 50; * Signed written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Imaging examination (CT, MRCP, EUS) showed distant metastasis of liver, lung and other organs; * Coexistent with other malignant tumors; * Pregnant or nursing women; * Previous gastrointestinal diversion; * Participation in another study during the month before enrollment in this study; * Alcohol and/or substance abuse or potentially poor compliance per a doctor's judgment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survival (OS)Three yearsOS was defined as the time from initial RFA or PDT to death or the end of the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse eventsThree yearsNumber of patients with adverse events
Progression-free survival(PFS)Three yearsPFS was measured from therapy until the date of disease progression or death

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJianfeng Yang, Doctor
yjf-1976@163.com, yjf3303@zju.edu.cn+8613454132186
Backup ContactHayat Khizar, MD
3180018940@qq.com+8613757147405

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026