Skip to content

Effect of Remote Physiologic Monitoring (RPM) on Outcomes in COPD Patients

The Clinical Significance of Patient Care Escalations From a Remote Monitoring Service

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05518981
Enrollment
126
Registered
2022-08-29
Start date
2019-05-01
Completion date
2022-02-28
Last updated
2022-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

Acute Exacerbation of COPD, Hospitalization, Exacerbation, Remote Patient Monitoring, COPD

Brief summary

This pre/post study was a retrospective analysis of unplanned hospitalization rates in a cohort of COPD subjects started on remote physiologic monitoring (RPM) at a large, outpatient pulmonary practice. The study included all subjects with high healthcare utilization (≥1 hospitalization or emergency room visit in the prior year) who had elected to enroll in an RPM service for assistance with clinical management. Additional inclusion criteria included being on RPM for at least 12 months and a patient of the practice for at least two years (12 months pre- and post-initiation of RPM).

Detailed description

This study included a retrospective analysis of data collected from subjects at a large outpatient pulmonology practice in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States between May 2019 and February 2022. At this clinic, patients who were candidates for RPM had been offered voluntary participation in service tailored to chronic respiratory disease patients (Spire Health, San Francisco, CA, USA). They continued regular follow-ups with their pulmonologists and received usual care according to the direction of their primary pulmonary physician for their COPD. Inclusion criteria for the present study included a clinical diagnosis of COPD (COPD, chronic bronchitis, obstructive lung/airways disease, or emphysema), subscribed to RPM for at least 12 months as of February 28, 2022, full electronic medical records (EMR) at the site in question for one year before and one year after the start of RPM, and high healthcare utilization (≥1 ER visit or hospitalization in the year prior to enrollment). All such patients were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was unplanned, all-cause hospitalizations per subject. Secondary endpoints included unplanned cardiopulmonary hospitalizations, respective lengths of stay, ER visits, outpatient pulmonary visits, and systemic corticosteroid use, adherence to RPM, and time-to-visit (RPM escalation to provider visit).

Interventions

DEVICERespiratory Remote Patient Monitor (Spire Health Tag)

The RPM service, tailored to chronic respiratory disease patients, utilizes a system that includes three components: undergarment-adhered cardiorespiratory sensors, in-home data transmission hub, and web-based clinical dashboard. The sensors are a set of six proprietary, skin-safe devices that include sensors for intermittent photoplethysmography, continuous respiratory force, and tri-axis accelerometers for activity. Clinical liaisons monitor deviations from patient-specific baselines and contact subjects for a risk assessment call, including questions about symptoms. If a subject fails the risk assessment, they are escalated to the site to be seen, and potentially treated, by their pulmonologist.

Sponsors

Pulmonary Associates of Richmond
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
CollaboratorOTHER
Spire, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of COPD (COPD, chronic bronchitis, obstructive lung/airways disease, or emphysema) * ≥1 hospitalization or emergency visit in the year prior to enrollment * enrolled in the Spire RPM patient monitoring service for at least 12 months * a patient of the practice for at least two years (12 months pre- and 12 months post-initiation of RPM).

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-Cause Hospitalizations1 year pre- and 1 year post-initiation of RPM (2 years total)The change in number of all-cause hospitalizations per patient

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cardiopulmonary Hospitalizations1 year pre- and 1 year post-initiation of RPM (2 years total)The change in number of cardiopulmonary hospitalizations per patient
Cardiopulmonary Emergency Room (ER) Visits1 year pre- and 1 year post-initiation of RPM (2 years total)The change in number of cardiopulmonary ER visits per patient
Pulmonary Outpatient Visits1 year pre- and 1 year post-initiation of RPM (2 years total)The change in number of pulmonary outpatient visits per patient
All-Cause Emergency Room (ER) Visits1 year pre- and 1 year post-initiation of RPM (2 years total)The change in number of all-cause ER visits per patient
Systemic Corticosteroid Use1 year pre- and 1 year post-initiation of RPM (2 years total)Number of new prescriptions of corticosteroids given by pulmonologist
Adherence to RPM1 yearProportion of days during the intervention period where physiological sensors were worn for at least 8 hours
Time to Visitup to 1 yearTime from escalation to visit with provider
Length of Stay1 year pre- and 1 year post-initiation of RPM (up to 2 years total)Length of hospitalization

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026