Skip to content

GAG-therapy Efficacy Trial Solution for Bladder Pain Syndrome/ Interstitial Cystitis (GETSBI Study)

GAG-therapy Efficacy Trial Solution for Bladder Pain Syndrome/ Interstitial Cystitis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05518864
Acronym
GETSBI
Enrollment
80
Registered
2022-08-29
Start date
2021-10-21
Completion date
2024-10-21
Last updated
2024-05-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bladder Pain Syndrome

Keywords

Bladder Pain Syndrome, GAG therapy, Hunner lesion, RCT, N-of-1 trial

Brief summary

Rationale: Efficacy study (RCT) for glycosaminoglycan(GAG)-therapy for the indication bladder pain syndrome / interstitial cystitis with Hunner lesion subtype (BPS-IC H+). reason for this study is a current lack of evidence regarding its efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Main objective is to determine short and long term efficacy of GAG therapy (bladder instillations) for people with BPS-IC H+ as compared to placebo treatment on dominant symptoms such as pain and Quality of Life (QOL)

Detailed description

Rationale: Reimbursement in the Netherlands for GAG-therapy for bladder pain syndrome / interstitial cystitis patients with Hunner lesion subtype (BPS-IC H+) is under debate, as evidence regarding its efficacy and cost-effectiveness is lacking. Objective: Main objective is to determine short and long term efficacy of GAG therapy (bladder instillations) for people with BPS-IC H+ as compared to placebo treatment on dominant symptoms such as pain. Secondary objectives are to determine the 1) cost-effectiveness of GAG therapy, 2) effectiveness of GAG therapy on quality of life and bladder inflammation evaluated by urethrocystoscopy Study design: Multi-design study. Study is powered and set-up as double-blinded randomized intervention study and is extended with a double-blinded aggregated N-of-1 trial. As requested by the Zorginstituut Netherlands, the study will be further extended with a prospective, non-blinded intervention study to evaluate long term follow up with a low frequency therapy dose. Study population: People with symptomatic BPS-IC H+ (\> 18 yrs old). A total of 80 patients will be included for the main study. Intervention : GAG bladder instillations (hyaluronic acid + chondroitin sulfate; Ialuril) 50ml administered with a catheter. Placebo will be Hypromellose 50ml administered with a catheter. Patients will receive instillations (Ialuril / placebo with ratio 2:1) in 3 periods of 6 wks with frequency of 1 instillation/wk. With wash-out periods 4 wks. After 3 periods of treatment / placebo (wk 30), blinding will cease and continue unblinded where all subjects will receive maintenance therapy Ialuril for 1x/4wk until 54 weeks (endpoint). Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome parameter: change from baseline in maximum bladder pain (visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score (3d average and maximal pain score). Secondary outcome parameters: * Change from baseline in VAS score (0-10) on self-reported secondary symptoms * Change from baseline from self-reported Global Assessment of Improvement (Likert scale) * Change from baseline from O'Leary-Sant IC Symptom Index & Problem Index questionnaire * Change from baseline in urethrocystoscopic evaluation of bladder mucosa (inflammation, active Hunner lesions) (clinician assessed estimated % of inflammation & degree of inflammation) * Change from baseline in Quality of Life using ED-5D 5L questionnaire (Dutch) * Cost effectiveness analyses using iMCQ and iPCQ questionnaires * Changes in Patient Reported Outcome questionnaire (incl. urinary frequency) * Adverse events using Clavien-Dindo system Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Benefits patients and group relatedness. All participants are capacitated adults and will receive a similar amount of intervention and placebo treatments. Treatment corresponds to the Dutch NVU guideline BPS. Therapy will be reimbursed for patients. During 54wks, patients will have a 6 week period where placebo is given. Due to the study design, patients can obtain a personal (individual) study efficacy result if therapy was successful in him/her. Therapy and placebo: risks and burden This study will be submitted as low-intervention trial. GAG therapy (instillations) has been used for \>25 yrs in clinical practice to treat BPS-IC. GAG-therapies are registered as medical devices. The therapy is instilled into the bladder using a catheter (by nurse / patient). Catherization has a small increased risk for developing an urine tract infection (1.9%) \[Herr 2015\], urethral discomfort and in rare cases urethral trauma. The placebo compound Hypromellose 0.3% is used as moisturizing drops to treat dry eyes. It is inert (non-irritating and hypo-allergenic). Very rare (\< 0.01%) side effects are reported in the Dutch 'Farmacologisch Kompas'. They report local side effects of sensitivity (burning, itch, tears e.d.). Blurry vision. and very rare systemic effects as rash, itch.Because of these reported side effects at inclusion the (over)sensitivity is checked by one drop in an eye, taking into account the possible blurry vision afterwards.

Interventions

DEVICEIALURIL Prefill

GAG therapy (bladder instillations with glycosaminoglycans)

Sponsors

ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
CollaboratorOTHER
IQ Healthcare
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Radboud Technology Ceter
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Zorginstituut Nederland
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Radboud University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Masking description

double blinded by care provider (person giving the treatment) and the participant (blinded syringes en placebo product)

Intervention model description

Study start as a normal double blinded RCT, but continues with an aggregated N-of-1 (multi-crossover) type trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult patients (18 yrs or older) with symptomatic BPS with established Hunner lesions objectified with urethrocystoscopy in the 3 months prior to inclusion. 2. A VAS pain score (maximum pain during the last 3 days; scale 0-10) of at least 4.

Exclusion criteria

1. pain, discomfort in pelvic region of inflammatory bladder conditions due to any cause other than BPS with Hunner lesions, with the exception of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and hypertonic pelvic floor or urine tract infections (UTI; \<3 UTI's / year). This is noted by ESSIC as a confusable disease \[van de Merwe 2007, contains an elaborate table for this\]. 2. had a urine tract infection in the previous 6 weeks. 3. received bladder instillations for BPS in the previous 3 months; 4. received intradetrusor Botulinum toxin (BOTOX) injections within the previous 12 months. 5. received transurethral coagulation/ablation therapy of Hunner lesions within the last 12 months, with the exception of patients who have objectified Hunner lesion recurrence(s) on cystoscopy after coagulation/ablation therapy after at least 3 months' post-intervention. 6. started a new treatment for (chronic) pain (pharmacotherapy) or urine tract infection in the last month. 7. Unable (also legal) to give informed consent. 8. Allergic to Hypromellose (tested in one eye)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in maximum bladder painFase 1: Week 1,2,5,7,8,12,15,17,18,22,25,27,28,29 Fase 2:week 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 54VAS pain score (0-10; 0= no pain, 10=worst pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
7-point Global Response Assessment (GRA) scaleFase 1: Week 1,2,5,7,8,12,15,17,18,22,25,27,28,29 Fase 2:week 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 54The GRA is a 7-point descriptive scale, scores of 1-3 indicate worsening of symptoms, and 5-7 indicate and improvement in symptoms
Change in patient assessed most dominant symptomFase 1: Week 1,2,5,7,8,12,15,17,18,22,25,27,28,29 Fase 2:week 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 54VAS score (0-10; 0= no burden, 10=high burden)
Voiding urgencyFase 1: Week 1,2,5,7,8,12,15,17,18,22,25,27,28,29 Fase 2:week 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 54as single item from the validated Genito-Urinary Pain Index questionnaire (5 point Likert scale)
Voiding frequencyFase 1: Week 1,2,5,7,8,12,15,17,18,22,25,27,28,29 Fase 2:week 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 54as single item from the validated Genito-Urinary Pain Index questionnaire (5 point Likert scale)
O'leary Sant interstitial cystitis symptom index/problem index (ICSI/ICPI)week 1, 6, 18, 28, 29, 40, 48Validated BPS-IC related symptom questionaire
Change in average bladder painFase 1: Week 1,2,5,7,8,12,15,17,18,22,25,27,28,29 Fase 2:week 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 54VAS pain score (0-10; 0= no pain, 10=worst pain)
Voiding diaryat baseline2x24h
Quality of Life questionnaireweek 1, 6, 18, 28, 29, 40, 48Outcome of ED-5D 5L QoL questionnaire
Urine sedimentweek 1, 6, 18, 28, 29, 40, 48Screening for bacterial urinary tract infection
Cost effectivenessweek 1, 8, 18, 28iMCQ and iPCQ questionaires
Cystoscopic evaluationweek 8 and week 28Likert scale inflammation (1-5)
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement (PROM) short and extendedweek 1, 8, 18, 28, 29, 40, 48Improvement (0-100%), continue treatment, reccommend to family, including Adverse Events and start/stop other treatment for BPS/IC

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactD.A.W. Janssen, MD PhD
dick.janssen@radboudumc.nl+31641856516
Backup ContactCharlotte van Ginkel, MD
charlotte.jvanginkel@radboudumc.nl

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026