Skip to content

A Study of Peresolimab (LY3462817) in Participants With Moderately-to-Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Phase 2b, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate Peresolimab in Adult Participants With Moderately-to-Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05516758
Acronym
RESOLUTION-1
Enrollment
491
Registered
2022-08-26
Start date
2022-08-31
Completion date
2025-01-17
Last updated
2025-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Autoimmune Diseases, Connective Tissue Diseases, Immune System Diseases, Joint Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Rheumatic Diseases, Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of peresolimab in adult participants with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis.

Interventions

Administered SC

DRUGPlacebo

Administered SC

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have a diagnosis of adult onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for at least 3 months prior to screening, as defined by the 2010 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria * Have moderately-to-severely active RA, at screening and baseline, defined by the presence of * ≥6 swollen joints based on 66 joint count, and * ≥6 tender joints based on 68 joint count. * Have had an inadequate response to, or loss of response or intolerance to at least 1 conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD), biologic DMARD ( bDMARD), or targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD) treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Have Class IV RA according to ACR revised criteria. * Have presence of 1 or more significant concurrent medical conditions per investigator judgment, including but not limited to * poorly controlled diabetes or hypertension * chronic kidney disease stage IIIb, IV, or V * symptomatic heart failure according to New York Heart Association Class II, III, or IV * myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, stroke or transient ischemic attack, within the past 12 months before randomization * severe chronic pulmonary disease, for example, requiring oxygen therapy * major chronic inflammatory disease or connective tissue disease other than RA, including but not limited to, * systemic lupus erythematosus * psoriatic arthritis * axial spondyloarthritis including ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis * reactive arthritis * gout * scleroderma * polymyositis * dermatomyositis * active fibromyalgia, or * multiple sclerosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving 20% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) Response at Week 12Week 12The ACR20 response was a composite measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional assessments used to evaluate improvement in rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms. ACR20 responders were participants with at least 20% improvement from baseline in tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 20% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core measures: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities, and acute phase reactant as measured by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Percentage of participants achieving ACR20 response= (number of ACR20 responders)/ (number of participants analyzed) \*100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving 70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 12Week 12The ACR70 response was a composite measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional assessments used to evaluate improvement in rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms. ACR70 responders were participants with at least 70% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC, and at least 70% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core measures: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities, and acute phase reactant as measured by hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR70 response = (number of ACR70 responders) / (number of participants analyzed) \* 100.
Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) According to Disease Activity Score Modified to Include the 28 Diarthrodial Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) ≤3.2 at Week 12Week 12DAS28-hsCRP LDA was defined as DAS28-hsCRP score of ≤3.2. The Disease Activity Score (DAS) based on 28 joint counts consisted of a composite numerical score derived from the following variables: tender joint count (0 to 28), swollen joint count (0 to 28), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP, mg/mL), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP equals to (=) 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) plus (+) 0.28\*sqrt (SJC28)+ 0.014\* participant's global assessment of disease activity+ 0.36\*natural log(hsCRP+1) + 0.96. Total Scores ranged from 1.0 to 9.4, with lower scores indicating less disease activity.
Percentage of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-hsCRP Score <2.6 at Week 12Week 12DAS28-hsCRP remission is defined as DAS28-hsCRP \<2.6. DAS based on 28 joints consisted of composite numerical score of the following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), hsCRP (mg/mL), and patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP=0.56\*sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt (SJC28) + 0.014\* patient's global assessment of disease activity + 0.36\*natural log(hsCRP+1) +0.96. Total Scores ranged from 1.0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity.
Percentage of Participants Achieving LDA According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score ≤10 at Week 12Week 12Low disease activity was defined as a CDAI score of ≤10. CDAI is a tool for measurement of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis that does not require a laboratory component and was scored by the investigative site. It integrates TJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), SJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity). CDAI is calculated by summing the values of the 4 components. CDAI scores range from 0 to 76; lower scores indicated lower disease activity.
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 12Week 12The ACR50 response was a composite measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional assessments used to evaluate improvement in rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms. ACR50 responders were participants with at least 50% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC, and at least 50% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core measures: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities, and acute phase reactant as measured by hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR50 response = (number of ACR50 responders) / (number of participants analyzed) \* 100.
Change From Baseline in DAS28-hsCRP Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12DAS based on 28 joints consisted of composite numerical score of the following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), hsCRP (mg/mL), and patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP = 0.56\*sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt (SJC28)+ 0.014\* patient's global assessment of disease activity + 0.36\*natural log(hsCRP+1) +0.96. Total scores ranged 1.0-9.4; lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in condition. Least Square (LS) Mean was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, stratification factors, baseline value, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors and participant as a random factor.
Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12CDAI is a tool for measurement of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis that does not require laboratory component and was scored by the investigative site. It integrates TJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), SJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity(scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity).CDAI is calculated by summing values of 4 components. CDAI scores range from 0 to 76; lower scores indicated lower disease activity. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement. LS Mean was calculated using MMRM with treatment, stratification factors, baseline value, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors and participant as a random factor.
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12HAQ-DI was a patient-reported questionnaire used in rheumatoid arthritis to assess physical function over the past week. It covered 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 to 3 items. Each item is scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Any activity requiring assistance from another individual or the use of an assistive device adjusts to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status. Total score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. The total score ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater physical limitations. LS Mean was calculated using MMRM with treatment, stratification factors, baseline value, visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and participant as a random effect.
Minimum Observed Concentration of Peresolimab by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE ADA) StatusBaseline through Week 12Minimum observed concentration of peresolimab was assessed and stratified by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE-ADA) status (TE ADA positive and TE ADA negative). A TE ADA evaluable participant was defined as TE ADA positive if they met the following criteria: 1. Had baseline status of ADA Not Present and at least 1 postbaseline status of ADA Present with titer ≥ 2×minimum required dilution (MRD) of the ADA assay (Treatment Induced TE ADA). The MRD of peresolimab is 1:10. 2. Had baseline and postbaseline status of ADA Present, with the postbaseline titer being 2 dilutions (4-fold) greater than the baseline titer. TE-ADA negative participants were defined as those not meeting the TE ADA positive criteria.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission According to CDAI Score ≤2.8 at Week 12Week 12Remission was defined as a CDAI score of ≤2.8. CDAI is a tool for measurement of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis that does not require a laboratory component and was scored by the investigative site. It integrates TJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), SJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity). The CDAI is calculated by summing the values of the 4 components. CDAI scores range from 0 to 76; lower scores indicated lower disease activity.

Countries

Argentina, Canada, China, Greece, Hungary, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Puerto Rico, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4W
All participants who initially received peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4W from Week 0 to Week 24 were grouped together and reported.
141
Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W
All participants who initially received peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W from Week 0 to Week 24 were grouped together and reported.
141
Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W
All participants who received peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W from Week 0 to Week 60 were reported.
68
Placebo SC Q4W
All participants received peresolimab-matched Placebo SC Q4W from Week 0 to Week 12 were grouped together and reported.
140
Total490

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006
Overall StudyAdverse Event5130135
Overall StudyAssigned treatment by mistake1000100
Overall StudyDeath1000000
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy6020363
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2020321
Overall StudyNon-compliance With Study Drug0010000
Overall StudyOther0000001
Overall StudyOther- As reported by the site2181238
Overall StudyParticipants not proceeding to Follow-up phase1020100
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1070112
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation1000015
Overall StudySite Terminated by Sponsor2000000
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor4030230
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject111152776

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPeresolimab 400 mg SC Q4WPeresolimab 100 mg SC Q4WPlacebo SC Q4WPeresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4WTotal
Age, Continuous54.50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.56
54.40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.08
54.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.15
53.20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.73
54.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.28
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
73 Participants44 Participants78 Participants72 Participants267 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
67 Participants24 Participants57 Participants67 Participants215 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants5 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
14 Participants6 Participants22 Participants10 Participants52 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
17 Participants6 Participants14 Participants20 Participants57 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants5 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
106 Participants54 Participants99 Participants105 Participants364 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
39 Participants24 Participants36 Participants36 Participants135 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
China
8 Participants4 Participants7 Participants6 Participants25 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
6 Participants2 Participants10 Participants11 Participants29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
9 Participants2 Participants7 Participants14 Participants32 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
21 Participants8 Participants27 Participants18 Participants74 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
24 Participants11 Participants12 Participants19 Participants66 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
1 Participants1 Participants8 Participants2 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 Participants15 Participants33 Participants34 Participants112 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
119 Participants52 Participants114 Participants119 Participants404 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants16 Participants26 Participants22 Participants86 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 121 / 1030 / 260 / 220 / 940 / 250 / 680 / 140 / 660 / 60
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 1270 / 10316 / 269 / 2260 / 9413 / 2548 / 689 / 1440 / 6629 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 1211 / 1031 / 263 / 228 / 943 / 254 / 684 / 147 / 666 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving 20% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) Response at Week 12

The ACR20 response was a composite measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional assessments used to evaluate improvement in rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms. ACR20 responders were participants with at least 20% improvement from baseline in tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 20% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core measures: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities, and acute phase reactant as measured by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Percentage of participants achieving ACR20 response= (number of ACR20 responders)/ (number of participants analyzed) \*100.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug. Non-Responder Imputation (NRI) was applied for participants who had missing data, used rescue or prohibited medication or early discontinued from study or study intervention before or at Week 12. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving 20% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) Response at Week 1251.8 Percentage of Participants
Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving 20% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) Response at Week 1251.1 Percentage of Participants
Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving 20% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) Response at Week 1244.1 Percentage of Participants
Placebo SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving 20% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) Response at Week 1239.3 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.01495% CI: [1.14, 3.11]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.09895% CI: [0.92, 2.52]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.53495% CI: [0.66, 2.23]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12

CDAI is a tool for measurement of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis that does not require laboratory component and was scored by the investigative site. It integrates TJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), SJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity(scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity).CDAI is calculated by summing values of 4 components. CDAI scores range from 0 to 76; lower scores indicated lower disease activity. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement. LS Mean was calculated using MMRM with treatment, stratification factors, baseline value, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors and participant as a random factor.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug and had data for CDAI. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4WChange From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12-19.98 units on a scale
Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4WChange From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12-17.20 units on a scale
Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4WChange From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12-15.42 units on a scale
Placebo SC Q4WChange From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12-14.04 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in DAS28-hsCRP Score at Week 12

DAS based on 28 joints consisted of composite numerical score of the following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), hsCRP (mg/mL), and patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP = 0.56\*sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt (SJC28)+ 0.014\* patient's global assessment of disease activity + 0.36\*natural log(hsCRP+1) +0.96. Total scores ranged 1.0-9.4; lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in condition. Least Square (LS) Mean was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, stratification factors, baseline value, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors and participant as a random factor.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug and had data for DAS28-hsCRP. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4WChange From Baseline in DAS28-hsCRP Score at Week 12-1.67 Units on a scale
Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4WChange From Baseline in DAS28-hsCRP Score at Week 12-1.41 Units on a scale
Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4WChange From Baseline in DAS28-hsCRP Score at Week 12-1.29 Units on a scale
Placebo SC Q4WChange From Baseline in DAS28-hsCRP Score at Week 12-1.08 Units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 12

HAQ-DI was a patient-reported questionnaire used in rheumatoid arthritis to assess physical function over the past week. It covered 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 to 3 items. Each item is scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Any activity requiring assistance from another individual or the use of an assistive device adjusts to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status. Total score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. The total score ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater physical limitations. LS Mean was calculated using MMRM with treatment, stratification factors, baseline value, visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and participant as a random effect.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug and had data for HAQ-DI outcome. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4WChange From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 12-0.44 units on a scale
Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4WChange From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 12-0.42 units on a scale
Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4WChange From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 12-0.23 units on a scale
Placebo SC Q4WChange From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 12-0.26 units on a scale
Secondary

Minimum Observed Concentration of Peresolimab by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE ADA) Status

Minimum observed concentration of peresolimab was assessed and stratified by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE-ADA) status (TE ADA positive and TE ADA negative). A TE ADA evaluable participant was defined as TE ADA positive if they met the following criteria: 1. Had baseline status of ADA Not Present and at least 1 postbaseline status of ADA Present with titer ≥ 2×minimum required dilution (MRD) of the ADA assay (Treatment Induced TE ADA). The MRD of peresolimab is 1:10. 2. Had baseline and postbaseline status of ADA Present, with the postbaseline titer being 2 dilutions (4-fold) greater than the baseline titer. TE-ADA negative participants were defined as those not meeting the TE ADA positive criteria.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug and had TE-ADA data for this outcome. Participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups). No study participant treated with peresolimab 1000 mg Q4W had a positive TE-ADA result up to Week 12; thus, zero participants analyzed and no data were collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4WMinimum Observed Concentration of Peresolimab by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE ADA) StatusTE-ADA Negative14700 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 113
Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4WMinimum Observed Concentration of Peresolimab by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE ADA) StatusTE-ADA Positive2060 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28
Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4WMinimum Observed Concentration of Peresolimab by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE ADA) StatusTE-ADA Negative4800 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 155
Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4WMinimum Observed Concentration of Peresolimab by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE ADA) StatusTE-ADA Positive487 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 248
Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4WMinimum Observed Concentration of Peresolimab by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE ADA) StatusTE-ADA Negative1150 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 152
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 12

The ACR50 response was a composite measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional assessments used to evaluate improvement in rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms. ACR50 responders were participants with at least 50% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC, and at least 50% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core measures: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities, and acute phase reactant as measured by hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR50 response = (number of ACR50 responders) / (number of participants analyzed) \* 100.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug. NRI was applied for participants who had missing data, used rescue or prohibited medication or early discontinued from study or study intervention before or at Week 12. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 1222.7 Percentage of Participants
Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 1219.1 Percentage of Participants
Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 1211.8 Percentage of Participants
Placebo SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 1210.7 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving 70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 12

The ACR70 response was a composite measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional assessments used to evaluate improvement in rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms. ACR70 responders were participants with at least 70% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC, and at least 70% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core measures: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities, and acute phase reactant as measured by hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR70 response = (number of ACR70 responders) / (number of participants analyzed) \* 100.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug. NRI was applied for participants who had missing data, used rescue or prohibited medication or early discontinued from study or study intervention before or at Week 12. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving 70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 127.1 Percentage of Participants
Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving 70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 126.4 Percentage of Participants
Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving 70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 127.4 Percentage of Participants
Placebo SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving 70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 122.9 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving LDA According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score ≤10 at Week 12

Low disease activity was defined as a CDAI score of ≤10. CDAI is a tool for measurement of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis that does not require a laboratory component and was scored by the investigative site. It integrates TJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), SJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity). CDAI is calculated by summing the values of the 4 components. CDAI scores range from 0 to 76; lower scores indicated lower disease activity.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug. NRI was applied for participants who had missing data, used rescue or prohibited medication or early discontinued from study or study intervention before or at Week 12. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving LDA According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score ≤10 at Week 1222.7 Percentage of Participants
Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving LDA According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score ≤10 at Week 1220.6 Percentage of Participants
Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving LDA According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score ≤10 at Week 1217.6 Percentage of Participants
Placebo SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving LDA According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score ≤10 at Week 1212.1 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission According to CDAI Score ≤2.8 at Week 12

Remission was defined as a CDAI score of ≤2.8. CDAI is a tool for measurement of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis that does not require a laboratory component and was scored by the investigative site. It integrates TJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), SJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity). The CDAI is calculated by summing the values of the 4 components. CDAI scores range from 0 to 76; lower scores indicated lower disease activity.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug. NRI was applied for participants who had missing data, used rescue or prohibited medication or early discontinued from study or study intervention before or at Week 12. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Remission According to CDAI Score ≤2.8 at Week 122.8 Percentage of Participants
Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Remission According to CDAI Score ≤2.8 at Week 125.7 Percentage of Participants
Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Remission According to CDAI Score ≤2.8 at Week 121.5 Percentage of Participants
Placebo SC Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Remission According to CDAI Score ≤2.8 at Week 121.4 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) According to Disease Activity Score Modified to Include the 28 Diarthrodial Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) ≤3.2 at Week 12

DAS28-hsCRP LDA was defined as DAS28-hsCRP score of ≤3.2. The Disease Activity Score (DAS) based on 28 joint counts consisted of a composite numerical score derived from the following variables: tender joint count (0 to 28), swollen joint count (0 to 28), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP, mg/mL), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP equals to (=) 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) plus (+) 0.28\*sqrt (SJC28)+ 0.014\* participant's global assessment of disease activity+ 0.36\*natural log(hsCRP+1) + 0.96. Total Scores ranged from 1.0 to 9.4, with lower scores indicating less disease activity.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug. NRI was applied for participants who had missing data, used rescue or prohibited medication or early discontinued from study or study intervention before or at Week 12. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) According to Disease Activity Score Modified to Include the 28 Diarthrodial Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) ≤3.2 at Week 1217.7 Percentage of Participants
Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) According to Disease Activity Score Modified to Include the 28 Diarthrodial Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) ≤3.2 at Week 1217.0 Percentage of Participants
Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) According to Disease Activity Score Modified to Include the 28 Diarthrodial Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) ≤3.2 at Week 1217.6 Percentage of Participants
Placebo SC Q4WPercentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) According to Disease Activity Score Modified to Include the 28 Diarthrodial Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) ≤3.2 at Week 127.1 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-hsCRP Score <2.6 at Week 12

DAS28-hsCRP remission is defined as DAS28-hsCRP \<2.6. DAS based on 28 joints consisted of composite numerical score of the following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), hsCRP (mg/mL), and patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP=0.56\*sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt (SJC28) + 0.014\* patient's global assessment of disease activity + 0.36\*natural log(hsCRP+1) +0.96. Total Scores ranged from 1.0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug. NRI was applied for participants who had missing data, used rescue or prohibited medication or early discontinued from study or study intervention before or at Week 12. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-hsCRP Score <2.6 at Week 1211.3 Percentage of Participants
Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-hsCRP Score <2.6 at Week 129.9 Percentage of Participants
Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4WPercentage of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-hsCRP Score <2.6 at Week 125.9 Percentage of Participants
Placebo SC Q4WPercentage of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-hsCRP Score <2.6 at Week 124.3 Percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026