Arthritis, Autoimmune Diseases, Connective Tissue Diseases, Immune System Diseases, Joint Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Rheumatic Diseases, Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
The main purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of peresolimab in adult participants with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis.
Interventions
Administered SC
Administered SC
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Have a diagnosis of adult onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for at least 3 months prior to screening, as defined by the 2010 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria * Have moderately-to-severely active RA, at screening and baseline, defined by the presence of * ≥6 swollen joints based on 66 joint count, and * ≥6 tender joints based on 68 joint count. * Have had an inadequate response to, or loss of response or intolerance to at least 1 conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD), biologic DMARD ( bDMARD), or targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD) treatment.
Exclusion criteria
* Have Class IV RA according to ACR revised criteria. * Have presence of 1 or more significant concurrent medical conditions per investigator judgment, including but not limited to * poorly controlled diabetes or hypertension * chronic kidney disease stage IIIb, IV, or V * symptomatic heart failure according to New York Heart Association Class II, III, or IV * myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, stroke or transient ischemic attack, within the past 12 months before randomization * severe chronic pulmonary disease, for example, requiring oxygen therapy * major chronic inflammatory disease or connective tissue disease other than RA, including but not limited to, * systemic lupus erythematosus * psoriatic arthritis * axial spondyloarthritis including ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis * reactive arthritis * gout * scleroderma * polymyositis * dermatomyositis * active fibromyalgia, or * multiple sclerosis
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving 20% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) Response at Week 12 | Week 12 | The ACR20 response was a composite measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional assessments used to evaluate improvement in rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms. ACR20 responders were participants with at least 20% improvement from baseline in tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 20% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core measures: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities, and acute phase reactant as measured by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Percentage of participants achieving ACR20 response= (number of ACR20 responders)/ (number of participants analyzed) \*100. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving 70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 12 | Week 12 | The ACR70 response was a composite measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional assessments used to evaluate improvement in rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms. ACR70 responders were participants with at least 70% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC, and at least 70% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core measures: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities, and acute phase reactant as measured by hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR70 response = (number of ACR70 responders) / (number of participants analyzed) \* 100. |
| Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) According to Disease Activity Score Modified to Include the 28 Diarthrodial Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) ≤3.2 at Week 12 | Week 12 | DAS28-hsCRP LDA was defined as DAS28-hsCRP score of ≤3.2. The Disease Activity Score (DAS) based on 28 joint counts consisted of a composite numerical score derived from the following variables: tender joint count (0 to 28), swollen joint count (0 to 28), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP, mg/mL), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP equals to (=) 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) plus (+) 0.28\*sqrt (SJC28)+ 0.014\* participant's global assessment of disease activity+ 0.36\*natural log(hsCRP+1) + 0.96. Total Scores ranged from 1.0 to 9.4, with lower scores indicating less disease activity. |
| Percentage of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-hsCRP Score <2.6 at Week 12 | Week 12 | DAS28-hsCRP remission is defined as DAS28-hsCRP \<2.6. DAS based on 28 joints consisted of composite numerical score of the following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), hsCRP (mg/mL), and patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP=0.56\*sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt (SJC28) + 0.014\* patient's global assessment of disease activity + 0.36\*natural log(hsCRP+1) +0.96. Total Scores ranged from 1.0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving LDA According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score ≤10 at Week 12 | Week 12 | Low disease activity was defined as a CDAI score of ≤10. CDAI is a tool for measurement of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis that does not require a laboratory component and was scored by the investigative site. It integrates TJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), SJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity). CDAI is calculated by summing the values of the 4 components. CDAI scores range from 0 to 76; lower scores indicated lower disease activity. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 12 | Week 12 | The ACR50 response was a composite measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional assessments used to evaluate improvement in rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms. ACR50 responders were participants with at least 50% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC, and at least 50% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core measures: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities, and acute phase reactant as measured by hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR50 response = (number of ACR50 responders) / (number of participants analyzed) \* 100. |
| Change From Baseline in DAS28-hsCRP Score at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | DAS based on 28 joints consisted of composite numerical score of the following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), hsCRP (mg/mL), and patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP = 0.56\*sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt (SJC28)+ 0.014\* patient's global assessment of disease activity + 0.36\*natural log(hsCRP+1) +0.96. Total scores ranged 1.0-9.4; lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in condition. Least Square (LS) Mean was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, stratification factors, baseline value, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors and participant as a random factor. |
| Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | CDAI is a tool for measurement of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis that does not require laboratory component and was scored by the investigative site. It integrates TJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), SJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity(scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity).CDAI is calculated by summing values of 4 components. CDAI scores range from 0 to 76; lower scores indicated lower disease activity. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement. LS Mean was calculated using MMRM with treatment, stratification factors, baseline value, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors and participant as a random factor. |
| Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | HAQ-DI was a patient-reported questionnaire used in rheumatoid arthritis to assess physical function over the past week. It covered 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 to 3 items. Each item is scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Any activity requiring assistance from another individual or the use of an assistive device adjusts to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status. Total score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. The total score ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater physical limitations. LS Mean was calculated using MMRM with treatment, stratification factors, baseline value, visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and participant as a random effect. |
| Minimum Observed Concentration of Peresolimab by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE ADA) Status | Baseline through Week 12 | Minimum observed concentration of peresolimab was assessed and stratified by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE-ADA) status (TE ADA positive and TE ADA negative). A TE ADA evaluable participant was defined as TE ADA positive if they met the following criteria: 1. Had baseline status of ADA Not Present and at least 1 postbaseline status of ADA Present with titer ≥ 2×minimum required dilution (MRD) of the ADA assay (Treatment Induced TE ADA). The MRD of peresolimab is 1:10. 2. Had baseline and postbaseline status of ADA Present, with the postbaseline titer being 2 dilutions (4-fold) greater than the baseline titer. TE-ADA negative participants were defined as those not meeting the TE ADA positive criteria. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission According to CDAI Score ≤2.8 at Week 12 | Week 12 | Remission was defined as a CDAI score of ≤2.8. CDAI is a tool for measurement of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis that does not require a laboratory component and was scored by the investigative site. It integrates TJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), SJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity). The CDAI is calculated by summing the values of the 4 components. CDAI scores range from 0 to 76; lower scores indicated lower disease activity. |
Countries
Argentina, Canada, China, Greece, Hungary, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Puerto Rico, Spain, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4W All participants who initially received peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4W from Week 0 to Week 24 were grouped together and reported. | 141 |
| Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W All participants who initially received peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W from Week 0 to Week 24 were grouped together and reported. | 141 |
| Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W All participants who received peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W from Week 0 to Week 60 were reported. | 68 |
| Placebo SC Q4W All participants received peresolimab-matched Placebo SC Q4W from Week 0 to Week 12 were grouped together and reported. | 140 |
| Total | 490 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 | FG006 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Assigned treatment by mistake | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Death | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Non-compliance With Study Drug | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Other- As reported by the site | 2 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| Overall Study | Participants not proceeding to Follow-up phase | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Deviation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Site Terminated by Sponsor | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Study Terminated by Sponsor | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 11 | 1 | 15 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W | Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W | Placebo SC Q4W | Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4W | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 54.50 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.56 | 54.40 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.08 | 54.00 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.15 | 53.20 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.73 | 54.00 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.28 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 73 Participants | 44 Participants | 78 Participants | 72 Participants | 267 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 67 Participants | 24 Participants | 57 Participants | 67 Participants | 215 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 14 Participants | 6 Participants | 22 Participants | 10 Participants | 52 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 17 Participants | 6 Participants | 14 Participants | 20 Participants | 57 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 106 Participants | 54 Participants | 99 Participants | 105 Participants | 364 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Argentina | 39 Participants | 24 Participants | 36 Participants | 36 Participants | 135 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment China | 8 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 6 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Greece | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Hungary | 6 Participants | 2 Participants | 10 Participants | 11 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Japan | 9 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants | 14 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Mexico | 21 Participants | 8 Participants | 27 Participants | 18 Participants | 74 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 24 Participants | 11 Participants | 12 Participants | 19 Participants | 66 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 8 Participants | 2 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 30 Participants | 15 Participants | 33 Participants | 34 Participants | 112 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 119 Participants | 52 Participants | 114 Participants | 119 Participants | 404 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 22 Participants | 16 Participants | 26 Participants | 22 Participants | 86 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk | EG007 affected / at risk | EG008 affected / at risk | EG009 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 12 | 1 / 103 | 0 / 26 | 0 / 22 | 0 / 94 | 0 / 25 | 0 / 68 | 0 / 14 | 0 / 66 | 0 / 60 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 6 / 12 | 70 / 103 | 16 / 26 | 9 / 22 | 60 / 94 | 13 / 25 | 48 / 68 | 9 / 14 | 40 / 66 | 29 / 60 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 12 | 11 / 103 | 1 / 26 | 3 / 22 | 8 / 94 | 3 / 25 | 4 / 68 | 4 / 14 | 7 / 66 | 6 / 60 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Achieving 20% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) Response at Week 12
The ACR20 response was a composite measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional assessments used to evaluate improvement in rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms. ACR20 responders were participants with at least 20% improvement from baseline in tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 20% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core measures: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities, and acute phase reactant as measured by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Percentage of participants achieving ACR20 response= (number of ACR20 responders)/ (number of participants analyzed) \*100.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug. Non-Responder Imputation (NRI) was applied for participants who had missing data, used rescue or prohibited medication or early discontinued from study or study intervention before or at Week 12. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving 20% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) Response at Week 12 | 51.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving 20% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) Response at Week 12 | 51.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving 20% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) Response at Week 12 | 44.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving 20% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) Response at Week 12 | 39.3 Percentage of Participants |
Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12
CDAI is a tool for measurement of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis that does not require laboratory component and was scored by the investigative site. It integrates TJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), SJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity(scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity).CDAI is calculated by summing values of 4 components. CDAI scores range from 0 to 76; lower scores indicated lower disease activity. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement. LS Mean was calculated using MMRM with treatment, stratification factors, baseline value, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors and participant as a random factor.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug and had data for CDAI. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4W | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12 | -19.98 units on a scale |
| Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12 | -17.20 units on a scale |
| Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12 | -15.42 units on a scale |
| Placebo SC Q4W | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12 | -14.04 units on a scale |
Change From Baseline in DAS28-hsCRP Score at Week 12
DAS based on 28 joints consisted of composite numerical score of the following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), hsCRP (mg/mL), and patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP = 0.56\*sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt (SJC28)+ 0.014\* patient's global assessment of disease activity + 0.36\*natural log(hsCRP+1) +0.96. Total scores ranged 1.0-9.4; lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in condition. Least Square (LS) Mean was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, stratification factors, baseline value, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors and participant as a random factor.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug and had data for DAS28-hsCRP. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4W | Change From Baseline in DAS28-hsCRP Score at Week 12 | -1.67 Units on a scale |
| Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W | Change From Baseline in DAS28-hsCRP Score at Week 12 | -1.41 Units on a scale |
| Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W | Change From Baseline in DAS28-hsCRP Score at Week 12 | -1.29 Units on a scale |
| Placebo SC Q4W | Change From Baseline in DAS28-hsCRP Score at Week 12 | -1.08 Units on a scale |
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 12
HAQ-DI was a patient-reported questionnaire used in rheumatoid arthritis to assess physical function over the past week. It covered 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 to 3 items. Each item is scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Any activity requiring assistance from another individual or the use of an assistive device adjusts to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status. Total score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. The total score ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater physical limitations. LS Mean was calculated using MMRM with treatment, stratification factors, baseline value, visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and participant as a random effect.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug and had data for HAQ-DI outcome. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4W | Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 12 | -0.44 units on a scale |
| Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W | Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 12 | -0.42 units on a scale |
| Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W | Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 12 | -0.23 units on a scale |
| Placebo SC Q4W | Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 12 | -0.26 units on a scale |
Minimum Observed Concentration of Peresolimab by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE ADA) Status
Minimum observed concentration of peresolimab was assessed and stratified by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE-ADA) status (TE ADA positive and TE ADA negative). A TE ADA evaluable participant was defined as TE ADA positive if they met the following criteria: 1. Had baseline status of ADA Not Present and at least 1 postbaseline status of ADA Present with titer ≥ 2×minimum required dilution (MRD) of the ADA assay (Treatment Induced TE ADA). The MRD of peresolimab is 1:10. 2. Had baseline and postbaseline status of ADA Present, with the postbaseline titer being 2 dilutions (4-fold) greater than the baseline titer. TE-ADA negative participants were defined as those not meeting the TE ADA positive criteria.
Time frame: Baseline through Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug and had TE-ADA data for this outcome. Participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups). No study participant treated with peresolimab 1000 mg Q4W had a positive TE-ADA result up to Week 12; thus, zero participants analyzed and no data were collected.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4W | Minimum Observed Concentration of Peresolimab by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE ADA) Status | TE-ADA Negative | 14700 nanograms per milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 113 |
| Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W | Minimum Observed Concentration of Peresolimab by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE ADA) Status | TE-ADA Positive | 2060 nanograms per milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28 |
| Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W | Minimum Observed Concentration of Peresolimab by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE ADA) Status | TE-ADA Negative | 4800 nanograms per milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 155 |
| Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W | Minimum Observed Concentration of Peresolimab by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE ADA) Status | TE-ADA Positive | 487 nanograms per milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 248 |
| Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W | Minimum Observed Concentration of Peresolimab by Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibody (TE ADA) Status | TE-ADA Negative | 1150 nanograms per milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 152 |
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 12
The ACR50 response was a composite measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional assessments used to evaluate improvement in rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms. ACR50 responders were participants with at least 50% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC, and at least 50% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core measures: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities, and acute phase reactant as measured by hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR50 response = (number of ACR50 responders) / (number of participants analyzed) \* 100.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug. NRI was applied for participants who had missing data, used rescue or prohibited medication or early discontinued from study or study intervention before or at Week 12. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 12 | 22.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 12 | 19.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 12 | 11.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 12 | 10.7 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving 70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 12
The ACR70 response was a composite measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional assessments used to evaluate improvement in rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms. ACR70 responders were participants with at least 70% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC, and at least 70% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core measures: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities, and acute phase reactant as measured by hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR70 response = (number of ACR70 responders) / (number of participants analyzed) \* 100.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug. NRI was applied for participants who had missing data, used rescue or prohibited medication or early discontinued from study or study intervention before or at Week 12. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving 70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 12 | 7.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving 70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 12 | 6.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving 70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 12 | 7.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving 70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 12 | 2.9 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving LDA According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score ≤10 at Week 12
Low disease activity was defined as a CDAI score of ≤10. CDAI is a tool for measurement of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis that does not require a laboratory component and was scored by the investigative site. It integrates TJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), SJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity). CDAI is calculated by summing the values of the 4 components. CDAI scores range from 0 to 76; lower scores indicated lower disease activity.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug. NRI was applied for participants who had missing data, used rescue or prohibited medication or early discontinued from study or study intervention before or at Week 12. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving LDA According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score ≤10 at Week 12 | 22.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving LDA According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score ≤10 at Week 12 | 20.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving LDA According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score ≤10 at Week 12 | 17.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving LDA According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score ≤10 at Week 12 | 12.1 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission According to CDAI Score ≤2.8 at Week 12
Remission was defined as a CDAI score of ≤2.8. CDAI is a tool for measurement of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis that does not require a laboratory component and was scored by the investigative site. It integrates TJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), SJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity). The CDAI is calculated by summing the values of the 4 components. CDAI scores range from 0 to 76; lower scores indicated lower disease activity.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug. NRI was applied for participants who had missing data, used rescue or prohibited medication or early discontinued from study or study intervention before or at Week 12. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission According to CDAI Score ≤2.8 at Week 12 | 2.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission According to CDAI Score ≤2.8 at Week 12 | 5.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission According to CDAI Score ≤2.8 at Week 12 | 1.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission According to CDAI Score ≤2.8 at Week 12 | 1.4 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) According to Disease Activity Score Modified to Include the 28 Diarthrodial Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) ≤3.2 at Week 12
DAS28-hsCRP LDA was defined as DAS28-hsCRP score of ≤3.2. The Disease Activity Score (DAS) based on 28 joint counts consisted of a composite numerical score derived from the following variables: tender joint count (0 to 28), swollen joint count (0 to 28), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP, mg/mL), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP equals to (=) 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) plus (+) 0.28\*sqrt (SJC28)+ 0.014\* participant's global assessment of disease activity+ 0.36\*natural log(hsCRP+1) + 0.96. Total Scores ranged from 1.0 to 9.4, with lower scores indicating less disease activity.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug. NRI was applied for participants who had missing data, used rescue or prohibited medication or early discontinued from study or study intervention before or at Week 12. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) According to Disease Activity Score Modified to Include the 28 Diarthrodial Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) ≤3.2 at Week 12 | 17.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) According to Disease Activity Score Modified to Include the 28 Diarthrodial Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) ≤3.2 at Week 12 | 17.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) According to Disease Activity Score Modified to Include the 28 Diarthrodial Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) ≤3.2 at Week 12 | 17.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) According to Disease Activity Score Modified to Include the 28 Diarthrodial Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) ≤3.2 at Week 12 | 7.1 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-hsCRP Score <2.6 at Week 12
DAS28-hsCRP remission is defined as DAS28-hsCRP \<2.6. DAS based on 28 joints consisted of composite numerical score of the following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), hsCRP (mg/mL), and patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP=0.56\*sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt (SJC28) + 0.014\* patient's global assessment of disease activity + 0.36\*natural log(hsCRP+1) +0.96. Total Scores ranged from 1.0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received atleast one dose of study drug. NRI was applied for participants who had missing data, used rescue or prohibited medication or early discontinued from study or study intervention before or at Week 12. As pre-specified in the SAP, participants receiving the same initial treatment were grouped together based on treatment from Week 0 to Week 12 (Placebo) and Week 0 to Week 24 (Peresolimab 1000 mg and 400 mg groups).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Peresolimab 1000 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-hsCRP Score <2.6 at Week 12 | 11.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Peresolimab 400 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-hsCRP Score <2.6 at Week 12 | 9.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Peresolimab 100 mg SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-hsCRP Score <2.6 at Week 12 | 5.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo SC Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-hsCRP Score <2.6 at Week 12 | 4.3 Percentage of Participants |