Skip to content

Effects of a Scapular-focused Exercise Protocol

Effects of a Scapular-focused Exercise Protocol for Patients With Rotator Cuff Related Pain Syndrome - a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05516186
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-08-25
Start date
2022-05-09
Completion date
2022-07-25
Last updated
2022-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Syndrome of Shoulder and Allied Disorders

Keywords

scapula neuromuscular activity and control, rotator cuff related pain syndrome, scapular dyskinesis, electromyographic biofeedback, control therapy, pain and function

Brief summary

Background: Current clinical practice still lacks consistent evidence in the physiotherapy management of Rotator cuff related pain syndrome (RCS). The purpose of this trial was to compare the effectiveness of a scapular-focused treatment with and without real-time electromyographic biofeedback (EMGBF) to a control therapy in patients with RCS. Methods: 60 patients with RCS were divided into three groups: scapular-focused exercise protocol group (P\_G n=20), scapular-focused exercise protocol with EMGBF group (P+EMGBF\_G n=20) and control therapy group (CT\_G n=20). Values of pain and function \[Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) questionnaire, complemented by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire\], scapular stabilizer neuromuscular control (SSNC), scapular stabilizer activation onset (SSAO), dynamic scapular alignment, range of motion (ROM) and glenohumeral flexor and abductor muscle strength (GMS) were assessed at baseline and after 6-weeks and compared within and between groups.

Detailed description

In order to advance the understanding of the value of scapular-focused exercise for rotator cuff related syndrome, a new trial was designed with the main objective of comparing pain and function outcomes between three different treatment protocols for patients with RCS: P\_G - Scapular-focused exercise protocol without electromyographic biofeedback (EMGBF) P+EMGBF\_G - Scapular-focused exercise protocol supported by real-time EMGBF CT\_G - Control therapy group with manual therapy (glenohumeral joint physiologic and accessory mobilization) , massage to reduce upper trapezius (UT) stiffness, and shoulder rotation strengthening into external rotation Every outcomes was assessed at the beginning of treatment, and then, weekly until completed 6 weeks of treatment.

Interventions

OTHERScapular-focused exercise protocol with EMGBF

Scapular-focused exercises, based on the dos Santos et al (2021) protocol with the aid of the electromyographic biofeedback

manual and exercise therapy

OTHERScapular-focused exercise protocol without EMGBF

Scapular-focused exercises, based on the dos Santos et al (2021) protocol

Sponsors

NOVA School of Science and Technology ı FCT NOVA
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1- age between 18 and 60 years; 2 - primary complaint of shoulder pain 3 - RCS clinical diagnosis

Exclusion criteria

1. \- neurological symptoms; 2. \- positive thoracic outlet syndrome (screened with Allen's and Adson's tests); 3. \- history of shoulder surgery or fracture; 4. \- structural injuries confirmed by imaging (e.g. ligaments and labrum); 5. \- symptoms reproduced by cervical examination; 6. \- unable to commit to scheduled treatments; 7. \- Anti-inflammatory drug use

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NPRS numeric pain rating scaleAt the initial assessmentFrom zero (better score) to 10 (worst score)
SPADI shoulder pain and disability indexAt the initial assessmentFrom zero (better score) to 100 (worst score)
DASH disabilities of the arm, shoulder and handAt the initial assessmentFrom zero (better score) to 100 (worst score)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
range of motionAt the initial assessmentGoniometry
scapular stabilizer neuromuscular controlAt the initial assessmentElectromyographic Biofeedback (EMGBF) PhysiopluxTM system version 1.06
glenohumeral flexor and abductor muscle strengthAt the initial assessmentManual Testing From 0 (worst) to 5 (normal)
scapular stabilizer activation onsetAt the initial assessmentElectromyographic Biofeedback (EMGBF) PhysiopluxTM system version 1.06
dynamic scapular alignmentAt the initial assessmentObservation of the medial and the inferior prominences of the scapula

Countries

Portugal

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026