Skip to content

Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin to Manage Recurrent Venous Thromboembolic Events

Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Versus Acenocoumarol to Manage Recurrent Venous Thromboembolic Events Despite Systemic Anticoagulation With Rivaroxaban

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05515120
Enrollment
58
Registered
2022-08-25
Start date
2021-01-03
Completion date
2022-07-01
Last updated
2022-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Venous Thromboembolism, Anticoagulant-induced Bleeding, Venous Thromboses, Pulmonary Embolism

Keywords

venous thromboembolism, Rivaroxaban, Aspirin, Acenocoumarol

Brief summary

Venous thromboembolism affects around 10 million people per year worldwide, however, despite its high incidence, there is no systematic review or randomized trial focused on the treatment of patients with recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or or pulmonary embolism (PE) during anticoagulant treatment. The objective was to compare the use of Rivaroxaban plus Aspirin versus Acenocoumarol in patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism treated with rivaroxaban.

Detailed description

Venous thromboembolism has two manifestations, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), affects around 10 million people per year worldwide, with an annual incidence of 1-2 cases per 1000 population and increases exponentially with age. \[1,2,3\] DVT is a multicausal disease thought to be triggered by interactions between multiple triggering factors that may be additive or synergistic, such as active cancer, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), or other chronic inflammatory disorders. \[2,4\] The contribution of genetics to the risk of thromboembolism venous traditionally includes protein C, protein S, and antithrombin deficiencies, prothrombin gene mutation, and factor V Leiden. \[5\] The exact epidemiology in Mexico is unknown, however, the estimated prevalence of deficiencies in a population studied in Mexico City were Protein C (PC) 0.65%, Protein S (PS) 0.65%, Antithrombin (AT) 2.04% and Plasminogen ( Plg) 2.5%. \[6\] For the treatment of patients with DVT and/or PE, the American Society of Hematology (ASH) guideline panel suggests using direct oral anticuagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), \[7\] however the use of a DOAC instead of a VKA for patients with DVT does not impact mortality, the use of DOACs has also been related to a reduction in the risk of DVT and major bleeding, although this was not statistically significant, the greatest advantage is that the use of DOACs do not require frequent dose adjustment, monitoring of the INR, or dietary restrictions, \[8 -31\] in our work center we started with DOACs as the first line of treatment. Recurrent DVT despite anticoagulation has been related to the presence of active cancer, subtherapeutic anticoagulation, use of concomitant anticancer drugs, younger age at presentation (\<65 years), and PE as the initial DVT. \[32-40\] Insertion of an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter was previously recommended in patients with recurrent DVT while receiving anticoagulant therapy. \[41\] However, the risk of recurrent DVT after IVC filter insertion is as high as 32% in cancer patients and has been associated with significant morbidity and poor quality of life; \[42-46\] It has been suggested that increasing the dose of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) may be an alternative to IVC filter insertion in patients with recurrent DVT, \[47-49\] however, to date, there is no systematic review or randomized trial focused on the treatment of patients with recurrent DVT and/or PE during anticoagulant treatment. The aim of the current study was to compare the use of Rivaroxaban plus Aspirin versus Acenocoumarol in the prevention of thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism treated with rivaroxaban.

Interventions

DRUGRivaroxaban 20 MG [Xarelto]

It was adopted an equal allocation of patients to each treatment (i.e., 1:1 randomization)

It was adopted an equal allocation of patients to each treatment (i.e., 1:1 randomization)

DRUGAcenocoumarol Oral Tablet

It was adopted an equal allocation of patients to each treatment (i.e., 1:1 randomization)

Sponsors

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Intervention model description

It was adopted an equal allocation of patients to each treatment (i.e., 1:1 randomization)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 74 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Objectively proven first episode of venous thromboembolism (upper extremity deep vein thrombosis, proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism). Objectively documented recurrent venous thromboembolism (either new or extended upper extremity deep vein thrombosis, proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) while taking systemic anticoagulation medication (Rivaroxaban).

Exclusion criteria

Previous hemorrhagic stroke Ischemic stroke in the last 3 months Severe renal impairment (CrCl rates \< 30 ml/min) Active liver disease (any etiology) Concomitant use of any antiplatelet (aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, ticlopidine, etc.) Increased risk of bleeding (congenital or acquired) Uncontrolled SAH Gastrointestinal hemorrhage within the past year Anemia (Hb level \< 10 g/dl) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count \< 100 × 109/l) Pregnant or lactating women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy outcome The presence of thromboembolic events90 daysRecurrent ipsilateral Deep vein thrombosis, Recurrent contralateral Deep vein thrombosis, Pulmonary emboli, Ischemic stroke and Myocardial infarction

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding90 daysThe primary safety outcome was major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)

Countries

Mexico

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026