Skip to content

Assessment of Visual Dyslexia Remediation Protocols - Dyslexia REMEDIATION

Assessment of Visual Dyslexia Remediation Protocols - Dyslexia REMEDIATION

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05514457
Acronym
Dyslexie REMED
Enrollment
13
Registered
2022-08-24
Start date
2022-11-17
Completion date
2024-03-15
Last updated
2024-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dyslexia

Keywords

Dyslexia, Remediation, Visual attention span, Visual search

Brief summary

Dyslexia is first described as a phonological deficit. Several studies report a neurovisual deficit in dyslexics. Some dyslexics have a visual deficit without phonological impairment, others have a pure phonological deficit, and still others have both types of deficits. From this observation the idea emerged to propose specific remediation protocols for people with visual impairments and to assess their effects on reading. At the theoretical level, if visual stimulation is able to improve reading performance, it is the demonstration of the existence of visual origin of dyslexia. At the clinical level, such a result not only opens the prospect of a different and more adapted rehabilitation for these types of dyslexia, but also the prospect, if the visual deficits are pre-existing to the learning of reading, to use them for early diagnosis and management.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALvisual stimulation with I pad

At the beginning of the study, for baseline condition, children will do 4 tests (visuo-spatial perception test, visual attention span, visual research, phonology tests). In the first group of the study, the children will do visual research exercises on I pad 10 minutes per day during one month = remediation. They will also do 4 reading aloud tests, once a month, for 3 months. The remediation exercises will be realized during the first, second or third month.

BEHAVIORALvisual stimulation with lamp

At the beginning of the study, for baseline condition, children will do the 4 tests like group 1. In the second group of the study, the children will do reading aloud tests, with lamp adjusted with different parameters = remediation (passive visual stimulation of a specific frequency believed to promote visual processing of written symbols).

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female * Aged 8 to 12 * Diagnosed dyslexics * Normal or corrected to normal vision * Legal guardians of children subjects providing their free, informed and written consent to participate in the study; With the child also giving orally his consent to participate.

Exclusion criteria

* other neurodevelopmental problem * strabismus, amblyopia For the glasses (group 2) : epileptic child are excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
reading performancefor arm 1: at baseline at 1 month at 2 month at 3 month For arm 2: 4 times in the same day, 4 consecutive reading sessions with a break in-between of minimum 5 minuteschange in reading time

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
score of Elementary Visuo-Spatial Perception testone time at baselinecomparisons of score of (lengths, sizes, angles and relative positions within and between objects). Minimum score = 36 and maximum (better) score = 72
visual attention spanone time at baselinenumber of letters identified in a single ocular fixation (200 ms)
Visual search timeone time at baselineaverage visual search time of symbols versus colored objects
performance score on the phonology tests (EVALéo 6-15 = Evaluation of written language and oral language 6-15 years)one time at baselinemetaphonology = removal of phonemes. Minimum score = 0 and maximum (better) score = 20

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026