Skip to content

HIIT vs. MICT Training Study

Physiological and Molecular Effects of High-intensity Interval Training (HIIT) vs. Moderate-intensity Continuous Training (MICT)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05513300
Enrollment
135
Registered
2022-08-24
Start date
2023-01-10
Completion date
2026-08-31
Last updated
2025-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lifestyle, Sedentary

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the impact of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on human health outcomes in healthy sedentary subjects, over 12 weeks of exercise training. The investigators will compare several health parameters, such as changes in multiomics profile, cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, and body composition, before and after 12-week interventions of either HIIT or MICT.

Interventions

OTHERExercise intervention

12 weeks of exercise training, 3 times per week, \ 1h long

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Be 18-65 years of age * Not be pregnant or lactating in the last 12 months, or planning to become pregnant for the next 4 months. A pregnancy test will be performed on the day of DXA scan in women of child-bearing potential. Not be post-partum during the last 12 months. * Be generally healthy (a list of medical conditions and/or medication that will exclude participants is listed in the section below) * Body mass index (BMI) \> 18 to \< 40 kg/m2 * Sedentary in the past year, defined as regular (structured) endurance exercise (e.g., brisk walking, jogging, running, cycling, elliptical, or swimming activity that results in feelings of increased heart rate, rapid breathing, and/or sweating) or resistance training (resulting in muscular fatigue), no more than 1 hour per week. Persons bicycling as a mode of transportation to and from work \>1 day/week etc. will not be considered sedentary. Leisure walkers are included unless they meet the heart rate, breathing, and sweating criteria noted above.

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cardiopulmonary Exercise TestingBaseline; 12 weeksChange in VO2 max after training, measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing
Clinical markersBaseline; 12 weeksChanges in measured lipids in mg/dL including total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides
Transcriptome after 12-week interventionBaseline; 12 weeksChange in mRNA-based expression measured in biospecimens after 12 weeks of training
Proteome after 12-week interventionBaseline; 12 weeksChange in protein measured in biospecimens after 12 weeks of training
Metabolome after 12-week interventionBaseline; 12 weeksChange in metabolites measured in biospecimens after 12 weeks of training
Lipidome after 12-week interventionBaseline; 12 weeksChange in lipids measured in biospecimens after 12 weeks of training
Epigenome after 12-week interventionBaseline; 12 weeksChange in epigenome measured in biospecimens after 12 weeks of training

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Leg strengthBaseline; 12 weeksChange in leg strength measured by Biodex
Hand grip strengthBaseline; 12 weeksChange in hand grip strength measured by Biodex
Resting heart rateBaseline; 12 weeksChange in resting heart rate measured by wearable devices
Metagenome profileBaseline; 12 weeksChange in metagenome profile from stool microbiome kit
Blood glucoseBaseline; 12 weeksChange in blood glucose in mg/dl profile measured with continuous glucose monitor
Left ventricle (LV) massBaseline; 12 weeksChange in left ventricle mass measured by echocardiogram
Metabolome after acute exerciseBaseline; 12 weeksChange in metabolites measured in biospecimens after acute exercise tests
Ejection fractionBaseline; 12 weeksChange in ejection fraction measured by echocardiogram
Exercise MotivationBaseline; 12 weeksChange in exercise motivation level measured by motivation for physical activity (RM 4-FM) questionnaire. RM 4-FM scores four different dimensions of motivation, each on a 0-7 point composite scale, with higher scores indicating stronger motivation.
Exercise Self-EfficacyBaseline; 12 weeksChange in exercise self-efficacy measured by Exercise Self Efficacy questionnaire, , a 9-item scale providing a 9-28 point composite score, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy for exercise.
DepressionBaseline; Week 4, 8, 12Change in depression presence and/or severity measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-8, an 8-item scale providing a 0-24 point composite score, with higher scores indicating greater severity.
Generalized AnxietyBaseline; Week 4, 8, 12Change in anxiety presence and/or severity measured by Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 , a 7-item scale providing a 0-21 point composite score, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.
Perceived StressBaseline; Week 4, 8, 12Change in perceived stress measured by Perceived Stress Scale-10, a 10-item scale providing a 0-40 point composite score, with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress.
LV diastolic volumeBaseline; 12 weeksChange in LV diastolic volume measured by echocardiogram
Transcriptome after acute exerciseBaseline; 12 weeksChange in mRNA-based expression measured in biospecimens after acute exercise tests
Proteome after acute exerciseBaseline; 12 weeksChange in protein measured in biospecimens after acute exercise tests
Lipidome after acute exerciseBaseline; 12 weeksChange in lipids measured in biospecimens after acute exercise tests
Epigenome after acute exerciseBaseline; 12 weeksChange in epigenome measured in biospecimens after acute exercise tests
Lean muscle massBaseline; 12 weeksChange in lean muscle mass in kg measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
Fat massBaseline; 12 weeksChange in fat mass in kg measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026