Skip to content

Comparison of the Centric Relation Recorded by Two Methods Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Comparison of the Centric Relation Recorded by the Gothic Arch Methods and the Neuromuscular Method Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05512442
Enrollment
10
Registered
2022-08-23
Start date
2020-01-01
Completion date
2021-04-01
Last updated
2022-08-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth Loss

Keywords

Cone-Beam computed tomography, the centric relation, the upper airway, mandibular position

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the variation in mandibular relation recorded by the gothic arch methods and the K7 method using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)

Detailed description

ten asymptomatic participants were selected,the centric relation registrations were separately recorded according to the technique of the gothic arch method and the neuromuscular method,subsequent, they were instructed to perform CBCT wearing two bite registrations,thus using dophin software to calculate the tmj space and the upper airway and using exocad software to ananyse the mandibular position, Data were analysed with paired t-test

Interventions

PROCEDUREthe centric relation

All participants were recorded the centric relation registrations according to the technique of the gothic tracing method and the neuromuscular method separately.

Sponsors

Fujian Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

absence of the mandibular position Classified as ASA 1 or 2 (normal healthy patient or with mild systemic disease, according to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System); Absence of the symptoms and signs of the temporomandibular joint; Willing to participate and to sign a written informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Cardiac pacemaker carriers and pregnant women; people with heart pace disorders and epilepsy; Temporomandibular or craniocervical disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the temporomandibular joint spaceimmediatelyaccording to the method of Ikeda and Kawamura, tmj space measurement in sagittal of the CBCT images were performed

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the upper airwayimmediatelyUsing the sinus/airway feature of the Dolphin software to reconstruct the upper airway,it included three region: the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
the mandibular positionimmediatelyconvert the DICOM files into the exocad software and analyse the difference of the mandibular position determined by the technique of the gothic tracing method and the neuromuscular method separately.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026