Skip to content

Computer Guided Esthetic Crown Lengthening

Treatment of Excessive Gingival Display Using Conventional Esthetic Crown Lengthening Versus Computer Guided Esthetic Crown Lengthening: (A Randomized Clinical Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05512312
Enrollment
16
Registered
2022-08-23
Start date
2022-01-02
Completion date
2022-10-12
Last updated
2023-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Altered Passive Eruption of Teeth, Guided Surgery, Gummy Smile

Brief summary

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical esthetic crown lengthening using digitally assisted 3D printed surgical stents in management of excessive gingival display due to altered passive eruption.

Detailed description

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical esthetic crown lengthening using digitally assisted 3D printed surgical stents in management of excessive gingival display due to altered passive eruption. Primary objectives: Wound healing Score: the clinical features of periodontal wound healing were measured according to Hagenaars et al using the following parameters: swelling of the soft tissue , color of the gingiva, probing pocket depth, bleeding index, plaque index, clinical attachment level. These signs were assessed at 1 week, 3 months and 6 months post-operative. Operating time: the time needed to complete each procedure was calculated in minutes by using a stopwatch from the time of the first incision till the completion of bone removal. Secondary objectives: Patient satisfaction: was assessed using visual analogue scale at 24 hours, 7 days and 14 days post operatively. (Zero is for minimum pain and ten is for maximum pain). Gingival margin stability: The position of gingival margin in relation to a reference point was evaluated immediately after surgery, 3 months and 6 months healing period .

Interventions

PROCEDUREConventional Esthetic crown lengthening

Conventional Surgical Esthetic Crown Lengthening

PROCEDUREComputer guided Esthetic crown lengthening

Computer guided Esthetic crown lengthening

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Males and females within age range of 20-40 years. 2. Systemic (medically) free individuals. 3. Excessive gingival display in the esthetic zone (more than 3mm of gingival display at full smiling) 4. Patients with good oral hygiene.

Exclusion criteria

1. Smokers (15) 2. Teeth with compromised periodontium. 3. Pregnant and lactating females. 4. The vulnerable group: patients with mental or physical disabilities. 5. Patients with parafunctional habits. 6. Medications that affect periodontal wound healing. 7. Periodontal surgery in the esthetic zone in the past 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound HealingChange in soft tissue features from 1 week to 6 months post operativethe clinical features of periodontal wound healing were measured according to Hagenaars et al using the following parameters: color of the gingiva (C) (a score of 0-2) 0=no redness, 1=moderate redness, 2=pronounced redness
Operating timeDuring surgerythe time needed to complete each procedure from the first incision till the completion of bone removal

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction1 day - 1 week - 2 weeks post operativewill be assessed using numerical visual analogue scale (scale of zero - no pain to ten- maximum pain)
Gingival margin stabilityBaseline - 3 months post operative - 6 months post operativeThe position of gingival margin in reference to an index is measured from the incisal edge to the free gingival margin

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026