Gut Microbiota in Patients With Urolithiasis

Urolithiasis

Urolithiasis (UL) is the presence of kidney stones in different compartments such as ureters, bladder and/or urethra. Based on its incidence and prevalence it is considered a public health problem worldwide. In Mexico, especially in Yucatan state, is considered an endemic area of UL with a prevalence of 5.5%. There are several risk factors associated with the development of UL, among which are genetics, age, sex, excess weight, diet, and gut microbiota. In the diet there is promoters and inhibitors of stone formation, such as oxalates and citrates respectively. The gut microbiota is the set of microorganisms that inhabit the gastrointestinal tract, which have been related to the regulation of metabolic processes such as production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), vitamin K synthesis, and stimulation of the immune response. However, alterations in the composition of the microbiota have been associated with the development of various pathologies including UL. Recent studies have shown that the intestinal microbiota of people with kidney stones have a lower diversity and a different bacterial composition compared with healthy people, suggesting that interactions in the gut-renal axis could have a direct effect on the development of UL. Furthermore, these modifications could modulate oxalate and citrate transporters. Dietary modifications may decrease the risk of UL formation through increased consumption of citrate-rich foods (\>40 mEq per day) and decreased consumption of oxalate-rich foods (\< 40mg per day). It is known that dietary modifications can modulate the gut microbiota, however there is no evidence about the effect of a dietary intervention with oxalate and citrate control on the modulation of the microbiota in patients with UL. Thus, it is important to search for strategies to reduce UL, as well as the complications associated with them like chronic kidney disease. The main of the study is evaluate the effect of a dietary intervention with oxalate and citrate control on the composition and diversity of the intestinal microbiota of adults with UL.

The protocol will be carried out in the Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de la Península de Yucatán (HRAEPY). This is double-blind randomized clinical study will be carried out in adults with a diagnosis of UL. Participants with UL are randomized by into three groups for 28 days. Control group: Caloric restriction, restriction of 500 kilocalories from the usual diet, or Intervention A: Restriction of 500 kilocalories from the usual diet plus a decrease in oxalate-rich foods (\< 40 mg per day) and an increase in citrate-rich foods (\> 40 mEq per day), or Intervention B: Real-life intervention with control oxalate and citrate foods: decrease in oxalate-rich foods (\< 40 mg per day) and an increase in citrate-rich foods (\> 40 mEq per day) without restriction of kilocalories from the usual diet. Randomization was performed by balanced blocks of three cells, with the research randomizer randomization program, 60 sites were randomized, which 20 participants were divided into three groups. Randomization was carried out by a person outside the study. At the beginning and at the end of the interventions, the following characteristics will be determined anthropometric measurements (weight, height, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI)) and blood pressure. A 24-h urine sample is requested to determine oxalates and citrates. A fasting blood sample of 8-10 hours will be requested for the determination of the concentration of creatinine, uric acid, calcium, phosphorus and sodium. A stool sample will also be requested for DNA extraction, which will be used for analysis of the composition and biodiversity of the intestinal microbiota. The person performing of measurements will be blinded to the group to which each participant belongs. Treatment will be given only through dietary counseling. Follow-up is done by telephone monitoring once a week through logbook and reminders. At the end of the study, the statistical analysis will be performed by a person who is blinded to the group to which the participants belong. The sample size was calculated with the formula for comparison of two proportions, with a one-tailed significance of 0.05 and a power of 80%, with a change in alpha diversity in the intervention group of 57% and in the control group of 18%. The result was 16 patients per group, but a 20% loss was considered. Therefore, a total of 20 participants per group was considered.

No related papers found yet.

Mexico