Educational Problems
Conditions
Brief summary
Endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation procedural skills are basic skills which have to be learnt by medical student and have to be practiced directly. However, during COVID-19 pandemic, offline training was difficult to be conducted and new specific learning method has not established yet. The study aims to assess the effectiveness of modified Peyton's four-step approach, which can be implemented through online training, compared to the classic Peyton's four-step approach in learning endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation procedural skills.
Interventions
OTHERClassic Peyton's Four-Step Approach
Instructor demonstrated endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation procedural skills directly to the preclinical students, followed by direct hands-on practice using manequin, ended with giving feedback to the students
OTHERModified Peyton's Four-Step Approach
Video tutorial of endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation were given to the students without explanation, followed by video tutorial making using manequin (without instructor) by the students which will be uploaded to Youtube
Sponsors
Indonesia University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Preclinical students of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia agreed to participate and signed the consent * Preclinical students of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia registered to attend every training session of endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation under Basic Clinical Skills module * 100% attendance in every session
Exclusion criteria
* Students who have attended endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation training beforehand * Students who have learnt endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation under Basic Clinical Skills module beforehand Drop out Criteria: * Preclinical students of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia who quit from Basic Clinical Skills module during research * Students who have never attended the training session
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Global rating | by the end of Basic Clinical Skill module, approximately 1-3 months after training | numeric score |
| Actual mark | by the end of Basic Clinical Skill module, approximately 1-3 months after training | numeric score |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction score | by the end of Basic Clinical Skill module, approximately 1-3 months after training | using Likert scale |
Countries
Indonesia
Outcome results
None listed