Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
stroke, theta burst stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked potentials, intracortical inhibition, cortical excitability
Brief summary
This study is to investigate the immediate effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) on intracortical excitatory and inhibitory circuits, neural connectivity, and network properties in patients with chronic stroke, using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalogram (TMS-EEG) and TMS-electromyography (EMG) and approaches.
Detailed description
The neurophysiological effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has been examined with TMS-electromyography (EMG)-based outcomes in healthy people; however, its effects in intracortical excitability and inhibition are largely unknown in patients with stroke. Concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalogram (TMS-EEG) recording can be used to investigate both intracortical excitatory and inhibitory circuits of the primary motor cortex (M1) and the property of brain networks. This study is to investigate the immediate effects of iTBS on intracortical excitatory and inhibitory circuits, neural connectivity, and network properties in patients with chronic stroke, using TMS-EEG and TMS-EMG approaches. In this randomized, sham-controlled, crossover study, 21 patients with chronic stroke receive two separate stimulation conditions: a single-session iTBS or sham stimulation applied to the ipsilesional M1, in two separate visits, with a washout period of five to seven days between the two visits after crossover. A battery of TMS-EMG and TMS-EEG measurements are taken before and immediately after stimulation during the visit.
Interventions
DEVICEIntermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)
A single-session standard 600-pulse intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is applied to the ipsilesional primary motor cortex.
The sham stimulation is the same as that of iTBS, but the coil is placed five centimeters away from the scalp. Electrical field simulation shows that the setups for sham stimulation would not induce any valid cortical activation.
Sponsors
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. suffered from first-ever, ischemic or hemorrhagic, unilateral stroke, verified by neuroimaging examinations such as CT or MRI. 2. detectable motor evoked potentials from the affected first dorsal interosseous muscle; 3. provided written informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
1. had any contraindication to transcranial magnetic stimulation; 2. had a known neurological disease excluding stroke, or psychiatric disease; 3. were using a psychostimulant, sedative, antidepressant, or antiepileptic medication.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked potential | Baseline (before iTBS stimulation) | Single pulses evoked an initial response in electroencephalogram, followed by a series of time- and phase-locked positive and negative deflections which could spread to the connected brain areas. The evoked potential is called transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked potential. |
| Motor evoked potential (MEP) | Baseline (before iTBS stimulation) | Single TMS pulses with suprathreshold intensity (120% of resting motor threshold of the stimulated cortex) applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) can produce recordable MEPs in contralateral muscles; additionally, the peak-to-peak amplitude of MEPs can be used to represent the corticospinal excitability |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cortical silent period | Baseline (before iTBS stimulation) | The cortical silent period (cSP) is a protocol measuring the intracortical inhibition, in which suprathreshold test pulses (120% of resting motor threshold of the stimulated cortex) are applied to the contralateral M1, while participants sustain 30% maximum voluntary contraction. Specifically, cSP refers to the interruption of background electromyographic (EMG) activity after the TMS pulse. |
| Short-interval intracortical inhibition | Baseline (before iTBS stimulation) | Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) is a form of paired-pulse protocol, in which a subthreshold conditioning pulse is delivered 2 ms before a suprathreshold test pulse. Theoretically, the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked by a test pulse at a given intensity is suppressed compared with that evoked by a single pulse at the same intensity. Eight trials are recorded, with inter-trial intervals ranging from 4 s to 5 s. The intensity of test pulses is fixed at 120% of the resting motor threshold, and the intensity of the conditioning pulse is set at 80% of the resting motor threshold. The result of SICI is expressed as the ratio of a paired-pulse MEP amplitude to a single-pulse MEP amplitude. |
| Intracortical facilitation | Baseline (before iTBS stimulation) | The setups for the intensity of intracortical facilitation (ICF) are almost the same as those for SICI; however, the interstimulus interval is longer, 10 ms. Eight trials are recorded, with inter-trial intervals ranging from 4 s to 5 s. The intensity of test pulses is fixed at 120% of the resting motor threshold, and the intensity of the conditioning pulse is set at 80% of the resting motor threshold. The result of ICF is expressed as the ratio of a paired-pulse MEP amplitude to a single-pulse MEP amplitude. |
Countries
Hong Kong
Outcome results
None listed