Critical Illness, Frailty
Conditions
Keywords
Outcomes, Frailty
Brief summary
A prospective observational study of critically ill patients over the age of 50, studying the occurrence of frailty as measured by a variety of frailty measures, processes of care and long term outcomes.
Detailed description
Frailty is common in critically ill elderly patients, and is associated with adverse impacts on outcomes and is becoming increasingly common in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) populations. However it is not clear as to how to best measure frailty and when to do so. It is also not clear as to how processes of care impact on the outcomes observed. We hypothesize that frailty in survivors of critical illness will be measurable at hospital discharge, will correlate with processes of care while in ICU and will better discriminate long term outcomes when compared to severity of illness or the degree of frailty present on ICU admission.
Interventions
OTHERNo interventions
No interventions
Sponsors
Canadian Frailty Network
Dr. John Muscedere
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Must Meet both 1 and 2 * 1\. Age \> 50 years. We have selected \>50 years in keeping with prior descriptions of critically ill patients \[17\]. 2\. Receipt of at least one of the following life support interventions for over 24 hours: 1. Mechanical ventilation: Both invasive and non-invasive either solely or in combination are acceptable. High flow oxygen (e.g. OPTIFLOW) as a form of Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) is acceptable but the patient's Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FIO2) at the time of enrollment must be greater \> 50%. 2. Vasoactive medications (vasopressors or inotropes). 3. Acute renal replacement therapy (RRT). Patient must have been admitted to ICU for the receipt of renal replacement therapy, either intermittent or continuous and after 24 hours of ICU admission, there is a continued need for further RRT.
Exclusion criteria
1. ICU admission greater than 5 days at the time of enrollment. 2. Expected to survive for less than 72 hours after study enrollment. 3. No family or caregivers available to collect collateral history. 4. Family or caregivers not able to speak English or French. 5. Projected inability to complete 6 month follow-up either by telephone or in-person.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Frailty status | 6 Months | Frailty as measured with the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). CFS is a 9 point scale with frailty defined as a CFS \> 4 with higher scores indicating greater degrees of frailty. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients with a measure of frailty prior to hospital discharge. | 28 days | Measure of the Frailty Index and Clinical Frailty Scale prior to discharge |
| Correlation of frailty severity at hospital discharge with long term outcomes (mortality, Quality of Life and Need for Institutionalization) | 6 months | Clinical outcomes at 6 months will include mortality, Quality of Life (EQ5L) and need for Institutionalization |
| Impact of admission critical illness on the development and severity of frailty as measured by a Frailty Index or Clinical Frailty Scale | 28 days and 6 months | Correlation with the progression or presence of frailty as measured with the Frailty Index or Clinical Frailty Scale |
| Correlation of ICU processes of care (nutritional adequacy, adverse events, mobilization and sedation) with frailty progression as measured by the Clinical Frailty Scale or Frailty Index | 28 days | Correlation of processes of care in ICU with frailty progression |
Countries
Canada
Outcome results
None listed