Skip to content

Safety, Tolerability and Prophylactic Antiviral Activity of Neumifil Against Influenza Via a Human Viral Challenge Model

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2a Study To Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Prophylactic Antiviral Activity of Neumifil Against Influenza, Via a Human Viral Challenge Model in Healthy Adult Participants

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05507567
Enrollment
104
Registered
2022-08-19
Start date
2022-08-12
Completion date
2023-05-04
Last updated
2024-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Influenza Viral Infections

Keywords

Influenza, Human Challenge, Prophylaxis

Brief summary

Study to assess the efficacy and safety of a multiple dose regimen and a single dose regimen of intranasal Neumifil, administered prior to challenge with Influenza virus in healthy adult participants

Detailed description

This is a single-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy adult participants to assess the pre-exposure prophylactic antiviral activity of Neumifil via a human viral challenge model. Participants will enter the quarantine unit on Day -4. Participants will be randomized to receive either active (single dose), active (multiple dose) or placebo in a 3:3:4 ratio followed by influenza viral challenge on Day 0. Participants will leave the unit on Day 8, provided that no virus is detected by a qualitative virus antigen test and the participant has no clinically significant symptoms. A final follow-up will be performed on Day 28.

Interventions

Liquid for intranasal spray administration

DRUGPlacebo

Liquid for intranasal spray administration

Sponsors

Pneumagen Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Intervention model description

Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Written informed consent signed and dated by the participant and the investigator obtained before any assessment is performed. 2. Adult male or female aged between 18 and 55 years old, inclusive, on the day prior to signing the consent form. 3. A total body weight ≥50 kg and body mass index (BMI) ≥18 kg/m2 and ≤35kg/m2. 4. In good health with no history, or current evidence, of clinically significant medical conditions, and no clinically significant test abnormalities that that will interfere with participant safety, as defined by medical history, physical examination, (including vital signs), ECG, and routine laboratory tests as determined by the investigator. 5. Participants will have a documented medical history either prior to entering the study or following medical history review with the study physician at screening. 6. Agree to use highly effective contraception 7. Serosuitable for the challenge virus

Exclusion criteria

1. History of, or currently active, symptoms or signs suggestive of upper or lower respiratory tract (URT, LRT) infection within 4 weeks prior to the first study visit. 2. Any history or evidence of any clinically significant or currently active cardiovascular, respiratory, dermatological, gastrointestinal, endocrinological, haematological, hepatic, immunological (including immunosuppression), metabolic, urological, renal, neurological, or psychiatric disease and/or other major disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with a participant completing the study and necessary investigations. Includes a history of depression or anxiety. 3. Any participants who have smoked ≥ 10 pack years at any time. 4. Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding 5. Any history of anaphylaxis or history of severe allergic reactions to any foods, drugs, insect bites or stings or any known allergy to tetracycline antibiotics. 6. Venous access deemed inadequate for the phlebotomy and cannulation demands of the study. 7. a) Any significant abnormality altering the anatomy of the nose in a substantial way or nasopharynx that may interfere with the aims of the study and, in particular, any of the nasal assessments or viral challenge b) Any evidence of nasal inflammation or nasal polyps within the last month c) Any clinically significant history of epistaxis (large nosebleeds) within the last 3 months of the first study visit and/or history of being hospitalised due to epistaxis on any previous occasion. d) Any nasal or sinus surgery within 3 months of the first study visit. Prior or Concomitant Medications and Assessments 8. a) Evidence of vaccinations within the 4 weeks prior to the planned date of first dosing with IMP. b) Intention to receive any vaccination(s) before the last day of follow-up (with the exception of vaccinations recommended for COVID19 as defined by Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA)/government vaccination guidelines). No travel restrictions apply after the Day 28 (±3 days) follow-up visit. c) Receipt of influenza vaccine (or another IMP relating to treatment of influenza) in the last 6 months prior to the planned date of viral challenge OR a diagnosis of influenza or influenza-like illness confirmed by a physician within the last 2 months prior to screening. 9. Receipt of blood or blood products, or loss (including blood donations) of 550 mL or more of blood during the 3 months prior to the planned date of first dosing with IMP or planned during the 3 months after the final follow-up visit. 10. a) Receipt of any investigational drug within 3 months (or 5 half-lives of the IMP used in the other study, whichever is greater), prior to the planned date of first dosing with IMP. b) Receipt of 3 or more investigational drugs within the previous 12 months prior to the planned date of first dosing with IMP. c) Prior inoculation with a virus from the same virus-family as the challenge virus. d) Prior participation in another human viral challenge study with a respiratory virus in the preceding 3 months. 11. Use or anticipated use during the conduct of the study of concomitant medications 12. Confirmed positive test for drugs of misuse and cotinine on first study visit 13 Recent history or presence of alcohol addiction, or excessive use of alcohol 14\. A FEV1 \<80%, a FVC \<80% predicted, or an FEV1/FVC ratio \<0.7. 15. Positive HIV, hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus test.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Symptomatic Influenza InfectionDay 1 to Day 8Number of subjects with quantifiable viral shedding on 2 consecutive days AND with any symptom score of grade 2 or greater at a single time point. Viral shedding was measured by RT-qPCR. Eleven symptoms were assessed by questionnaire and were graded on a scale of 0-3 (grade 0: no symptoms; grade 1: just noticeable; grade 2: clearly bothersome from time to time but does not interfere with me doing my normal daily activities; grade 3: quite bothersome most or all of the time, and it stops me participating in activities).
Severity of SymptomsDay 1 to Day 8Change in Peak Total Symptom Score (TSS) as measured by graded symptom scoring system collected 3 times daily; symptom questionnaire was graded on a scale of 0-3 (grade 0: no symptoms; grade 1: just noticeable; grade 2: clearly bothersome from time to time but does not interfere with me doing my normal daily activities; grade 3: quite bothersome most or all of the time, and it stops me participating in activities).Lower score means better outcome. The range was 0 to 33.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Weight of Nasal DischargeDay 1 (am) to Day 8 (am)Measurement of total weight of mucus produced by participants. The total weight of used tissues was measured to assess the weight of mucus produced. The greater the weight of the tissues the more mucus produced and the worse the outcome.
Nasal DischargeDay 1 (am) to Day 8 (am)The number of tissues used by participants were counted. The greater the number of tissues used the worse the outcome.
Area Under the Curve (AUC) Over Time of Total Symptom Score (TSS)Day 1 to Day 8Participants completed a self-assessment symptom score 3 times daily, graded on a scale of 0-3 (grade 0: no symptoms; grade 1: just noticeable; grade 2: clearly bothersome from time to time but does not interfere with me doing my normal daily activities; grade 3: quite bothersome most or all of the time, and it stops me participating in activities).Lower score means better outcome. Range 0 to 33
Adverse Events, UnsolicitedFrom intake of first dose of IMP on Day -3 to Day 28Number of participants reporting treatment emergent adverse events, unsolicited
Adverse Events, SolicitedFrom intake of first dose of IMP (Day -3) up to 12 hours post the last IMP dose (Day -1)Number of participants reporting a solicited adverse event during the treatment period of IMP
Viral Shedding Over TimeDay 1 (pm) to Day 8 (am)Measurement of influenza viral load (VL) area under the curve (VL-AUC) of quantifiable measurements by RT-qPCR in nasal samples. The AUC is expressed as the log to the base 10 copies in a mL of nasal fluid multiplied by the time in days \[(log10 copies/mL)\*day\]. The higher the viral load AUC, by PCR, the worse the outcome.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Following screening (Day -93 to Day -5), this study was conducted with an inpatient phase (Day -4 to Day 8) and an outpatient follow-up on Day 28 (plus or minus 3 days). During the inpatient quarantine phase, participants received Neumifil or placebo according to the randomisation on Day -3, Day -2 and Day -1, and then received Influenza Challenge Virus on Day 0. The study was conducted at one site in the UK between 12 August 2022 and 03 May 2023.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Neumifil Multiple Dose Prophylactic Treatment
Neumifil intranasal spray administered as 3 single daily doses prior to viral challenge Neumifil: Liquid for intranasal spray administration
32
Neumifil Single Dose Prophylactic Treatment
Neumifil intranasal spray administered as a single dose on Day -3 and blinded by placebo administered as two single daily doses. All administrations completed prior to viral challenge Neumifil: Liquid for intranasal spray administration Placebo: Liquid for intranasal spray administration
31
Placebo
Intranasal spray administered as 3 single daily doses prior to viral challenge Placebo: Liquid for intranasal spray administration
41
Total104

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
From Challenge Virus to End of StudyWithdrawal by Subject020
Randomised and Received Challenge VirusDid not complete quarantine100
Randomised and Received Challenge VirusLost to Follow-up001
Randomised and Received Challenge VirusPhysician Decision100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNeumifil Multiple Dose Prophylactic TreatmentNeumifil Single Dose Prophylactic TreatmentPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous31.22 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.79
30.32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.06
31.05 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.82
30.88 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.67
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
31 Participants29 Participants39 Participants99 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
21 Participants22 Participants33 Participants76 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
32 participants31 participants41 participants104 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants9 Participants14 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants22 Participants27 Participants72 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 320 / 310 / 41
other
Total, other adverse events
30 / 3225 / 3134 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 320 / 310 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence of Symptomatic Influenza Infection

Number of subjects with quantifiable viral shedding on 2 consecutive days AND with any symptom score of grade 2 or greater at a single time point. Viral shedding was measured by RT-qPCR. Eleven symptoms were assessed by questionnaire and were graded on a scale of 0-3 (grade 0: no symptoms; grade 1: just noticeable; grade 2: clearly bothersome from time to time but does not interfere with me doing my normal daily activities; grade 3: quite bothersome most or all of the time, and it stops me participating in activities).

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 8

Population: Per Protocol population (participants who received all doses, challenge virus and completed quarantine up to Day 8)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Neumifil Multiple Dose Prophylactic TreatmentIncidence of Symptomatic Influenza Infection6 Participants
Neumifil Single Dose Prophylactic TreatmentIncidence of Symptomatic Influenza Infection6 Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Symptomatic Influenza Infection16 Participants
Pooled Neumifil GroupsIncidence of Symptomatic Influenza Infection12 Participants
Comparison: A priori primary analysis groupp-value: 0.0331Chi-squared
Primary

Severity of Symptoms

Change in Peak Total Symptom Score (TSS) as measured by graded symptom scoring system collected 3 times daily; symptom questionnaire was graded on a scale of 0-3 (grade 0: no symptoms; grade 1: just noticeable; grade 2: clearly bothersome from time to time but does not interfere with me doing my normal daily activities; grade 3: quite bothersome most or all of the time, and it stops me participating in activities).Lower score means better outcome. The range was 0 to 33.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 8

Population: Per Protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Neumifil Multiple Dose Prophylactic TreatmentSeverity of Symptoms3.00 Scores on a scale
Neumifil Single Dose Prophylactic TreatmentSeverity of Symptoms1.00 Scores on a scale
PlaceboSeverity of Symptoms3.00 Scores on a scale
Pooled Neumifil GroupsSeverity of Symptoms2.00 Scores on a scale
p-value: 0.1427Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Adverse Events, Solicited

Number of participants reporting a solicited adverse event during the treatment period of IMP

Time frame: From intake of first dose of IMP (Day -3) up to 12 hours post the last IMP dose (Day -1)

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Neumifil Multiple Dose Prophylactic TreatmentAdverse Events, Solicited29 Participants
Neumifil Single Dose Prophylactic TreatmentAdverse Events, Solicited22 Participants
PlaceboAdverse Events, Solicited29 Participants
Secondary

Adverse Events, Unsolicited

Number of participants reporting treatment emergent adverse events, unsolicited

Time frame: From intake of first dose of IMP on Day -3 to Day 28

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Neumifil Multiple Dose Prophylactic TreatmentAdverse Events, Unsolicited9 Participants
Neumifil Single Dose Prophylactic TreatmentAdverse Events, Unsolicited8 Participants
PlaceboAdverse Events, Unsolicited17 Participants
Secondary

Area Under the Curve (AUC) Over Time of Total Symptom Score (TSS)

Participants completed a self-assessment symptom score 3 times daily, graded on a scale of 0-3 (grade 0: no symptoms; grade 1: just noticeable; grade 2: clearly bothersome from time to time but does not interfere with me doing my normal daily activities; grade 3: quite bothersome most or all of the time, and it stops me participating in activities).Lower score means better outcome. Range 0 to 33

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 8

Population: Per Protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Neumifil Multiple Dose Prophylactic TreatmentArea Under the Curve (AUC) Over Time of Total Symptom Score (TSS)4.05 (Units on a scale)*day
Neumifil Single Dose Prophylactic TreatmentArea Under the Curve (AUC) Over Time of Total Symptom Score (TSS)0.11 (Units on a scale)*day
PlaceboArea Under the Curve (AUC) Over Time of Total Symptom Score (TSS)3.73 (Units on a scale)*day
Pooled Neumifil GroupsArea Under the Curve (AUC) Over Time of Total Symptom Score (TSS)2.44 (Units on a scale)*day
p-value: 0.1307Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Nasal Discharge

The number of tissues used by participants were counted. The greater the number of tissues used the worse the outcome.

Time frame: Day 1 (am) to Day 8 (am)

Population: Per Protocol population (Data not available for all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Neumifil Multiple Dose Prophylactic TreatmentNasal Discharge14.00 sum of number of tissues
Neumifil Single Dose Prophylactic TreatmentNasal Discharge2.00 sum of number of tissues
PlaceboNasal Discharge7.00 sum of number of tissues
Pooled Neumifil GroupsNasal Discharge5.5 sum of number of tissues
Secondary

Viral Shedding Over Time

Measurement of influenza viral load (VL) in nasal samples over time (VL-AUC) measured by viral culture. Nasal secretions were cultured and the Tissue Culture Infectious Dose (TCID50) calculated. The AUC of log to the base 10 of the TCID50 in each mL of nasal secretions, multiplied by the time in days \[(log10 TCID50/mL)\*day\] was calculated. The higher the viral load AUC by culture, the worse the outcome.

Time frame: Day 1 (pm) to Day 8 (am)

Population: Per Protocol population (one participant in the placebo group had a missing value)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Neumifil Multiple Dose Prophylactic TreatmentViral Shedding Over Time3.29 (log10 TCID50/mL)*day
Neumifil Single Dose Prophylactic TreatmentViral Shedding Over Time3.30 (log10 TCID50/mL)*day
PlaceboViral Shedding Over Time4.79 (log10 TCID50/mL)*day
Pooled Neumifil GroupsViral Shedding Over Time3.30 (log10 TCID50/mL)*day
p-value: 0.011Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Viral Shedding Over Time

Measurement of influenza viral load (VL) area under the curve (VL-AUC) of quantifiable measurements by RT-qPCR in nasal samples. The AUC is expressed as the log to the base 10 copies in a mL of nasal fluid multiplied by the time in days \[(log10 copies/mL)\*day\]. The higher the viral load AUC, by PCR, the worse the outcome.

Time frame: Day 1 (pm) to Day 8 (am)

Population: Per Protocol Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Neumifil Multiple Dose Prophylactic TreatmentViral Shedding Over Time9.96 (log10 copies/mL)*day
Neumifil Single Dose Prophylactic TreatmentViral Shedding Over Time8.60 (log10 copies/mL)*day
PlaceboViral Shedding Over Time17.24 (log10 copies/mL)*day
Pooled Neumifil GroupsViral Shedding Over Time9.39 (log10 copies/mL)*day
p-value: 0.0382Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Weight of Nasal Discharge

Measurement of total weight of mucus produced by participants. The total weight of used tissues was measured to assess the weight of mucus produced. The greater the weight of the tissues the more mucus produced and the worse the outcome.

Time frame: Day 1 (am) to Day 8 (am)

Population: Per Protocol population (Data not available for all participants)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Neumifil Multiple Dose Prophylactic TreatmentWeight of Nasal Discharge5.24 grams
Neumifil Single Dose Prophylactic TreatmentWeight of Nasal Discharge0.26 grams
PlaceboWeight of Nasal Discharge2.74 grams
Pooled Neumifil GroupsWeight of Nasal Discharge0.97 grams

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026