Skip to content

Dasatinib and Quercetin to Treat Fibrotic Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Dasatinib and Quercetin, a Combination of Senolytics to Treat Fibrotic Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - the TRUTH Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05506488
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-08-18
Start date
2023-07-05
Completion date
2026-02-26
Last updated
2026-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Fibrosis, NAFLD, NASH With Fibrosis

Brief summary

To examine the effect of dasatinib plus quercetin on liver fibrosis in individuals with biopsy proven NAFLD with fibrosis by performing a double-blind randomized controlled proof-of-principle study

Detailed description

Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is estimated to affect approximately 25-30% of the population in Western countries and is now the leading cause of chronic liver disease globally. NAFLD is a progressive liver disease and approximately 30% of individuals progress from simple steatosis to Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH), which can further progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. In the Netherlands, it is estimated that 2.5 million people have NAFLD and this number is thought to increase by 50% in the next 10 years driven by an increasing prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes, and an ageing population. Independent of other cardiometabolic diseases, cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in individuals with NAFLD, followed by extrahepatic malignancies and liver-related complications. NAFLD results in sustained healthcare costs and economic losses, and reduced health-related quality of life. It is now widely accepted that liver fibrosis is a result of liver injury secondary to NAFLD and is a major predictor for liver-related and overall mortality in individuals with NAFLD. The process of fibrosis progression is not completely understood, and it can vary considerably from one individual to another. Several risk factors for fibrosis progression have been identified: age, hypertension, obesity and type 2 diabetes. As of to date, no treatment is available that proved to be successful to target hepatic fibrosis. The only therapeutic options currently available therefore are the control of the concomitant metabolic diseases in addition to diet and lifestyle changes. Unfortunately, this inevitably will lead to polypharmacy and thereby decreases treatment adherence and increases the risk of adverse events and interactions with other drugs. Recently, cellular senescence has been put forward as a causal factor in the development and progression of NAFLD and NAFLD related liver fibrosis. Cellular senescence is one of the hallmarks of aging and is defined as a stable arrest of the cell cycle coupled to specific phenotypic changes. Senescent cells secrete a collection of proteins called the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). This pro-inflammatory secretome drives age-related tissue dysfunction. Interestingly, metabolic dysregulation is thought to favor cellular senescence in several tissues involved in the pathogenesis of NAFLD such as the liver, pancreas and adipose tissue, further perpetuating metabolic dysregulation. Of interest, cellular senescence can be targeted using senolytics. The combination of dasatinib, which is an EMA-approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor and the antioxidant quercetin, which is a flavonol present in many fruits and vegetables, successfully clears senescent cells. Recent work in humans and rodents have shown that tissue function, including liver metabolism, can be recovered by clearing senescent cells with senolytics including. Due the potential role of senescence in NAFLD related fibrosis, dasatinib plus quercetin might thus be an interesting future therapeutic option to tackle NAFLD related fibrosis. Based on the long-term safety profile of these treatments and the high unmet clinical need as there currently is no treatment for NAFLD we aim to perform a double-blind randomized controlled proof-of-principle study in which patients with NAFLD related liver fibrosis will be treated with dasatinib plus quercetin intermittently three days per week for three weeks, followed by a four-week medication-free period. Subsequently, this treatment cycle will be repeated three times

Interventions

DRUGDasatinib 100 MG + Quercetin (1000 MG)

The intervention group will receive intermittent orally administered dasatinib (100 mg/day) plus quercetin (1000 mg/day) on three consecutive days for three consecutive weeks followed by a four-week medication free period. This cycle will be repeated three times.

OTHERPlacebo

The placebo group will receive intermittent orally administered placebo tablets on three consecutive days for three consecutive weeks followed by a four-week medication free period. This cycle will be repeated three times.

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

double blind randomized trial

Intervention model description

Double-blind randomized controlled proof-of-principle study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adult individuals, age \> 18 years * NAFLD with fibrosis score \>2 according to the Steatosis Activity and Fibrosis score, but no cirrhosis histological diagnosis according to the SAF fibrosis score on a liver biopsy performed \< 6 months before screening in the study and confirmed by central reading during the screening period. * Individuals agrees to have a liver biopsy performed after the treatment * Compensated liver disease with the following hematologic and biochemical criteria on entry into protocol: * ALAT \<10x ULN * Hemoglobin \> 11g/dL for females and 12 g/dL for males * White blood cell (WBC) \> 2.5 K/ μL * Neutrophil count \> 1.5 K μL * Platelets \> 100 K/μL * Total bilirubin \<35 μmol/L * Albumin \>30 g/L * TP \>80% or INR \<1.4 * Serum creatinine \<1.3 mg/dL (men) or \<1.1 mg/dL (women) or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \> 60mL/min/1.73m2 * Have a stable weight since the liver biopsy was performed defined by no more than a 5% loss of initial body weight * Subjects should be able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of another form of liver disease * History of sustained excess alcohol ingestion: daily consumption \>30g/day (3 drinks per day) for males and \>20 g/day (2 drinks per day) for females * Unstable metabolic condition: weight change \> 5 kg in the last three months, diabetes with poor glycaemic control (HbA1c \> 8.5%), introduction of an antidiabetic or of an anti-obesity drug/malabsorptive or restrictive bariatric (weight loss) surgery in the past 6 months prior to screening * Bariatric surgery * ingestion of drugs known to produce hepatic steatosis including corticosteroids, high-dose oestrogens, methotrexate, tetracycline or amiodarone in the previous 6 months * Significant systemic or major illnesses other than liver disease, including congestive heart failure (class C and D of the AHA), unstable coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary disease, renal failure, organ transplantation, serious psychiatric disease, active malignancy, compromised immunity * Pregnancy/lactation or inability to adhere to adequate contraception in woman of childbearing potential * Body mass index (BMI) \>45 kg/m2 * Type 1 diabetes * Haemostasis disorders or current treatment with anticoagulants * Contra-indication to liver biopsy * History of/or current cardiac dysrhythmias and/or a history of cardiovascular disease event, including myocardial infarction, except patients with only well controlled hypertension * QTc \>450 msec on ECG * Use of prescribed drugs dependent on CYP3A4 with narrow therapeutic window and strong inducers or inhibitors of CYP3A4 * Use of H2-antagonists and/or Proton Pump Inhibitors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The primary endpoint is the binary outcome improvement of fibrosis with at least 1-point without worsening of fibrosis and NAFLD score based on histology after 21 weeks (yes/no). Individuals will be labeled as responder or non-responder.21 weekAs assessed on the obtained liver biopsies before and after the treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean change in number of senescent cells at baseline and end of treatment21 weekAs assessed on the obtained liver biopsies before and after the treatment
Percent of patients with reversal of NAFLD (Steatosis without ballooning and with or without mild inflammation) and no worsening of fibrosis) from baseline to end of treatment21 weekAs assessed on the obtained liver biopsies before and after the treatment
Global hepatic mRNA expression baseline to end of treatment21 weekAs assessed on the obtained liver biopsies before and after the treatment
Change in NAFLD activity score (NAS)21 weekAs assessed on the obtained liver biopsies before and after the treatment
change in Activity component of steatosis-activity-fibrosis (SAF) score: steatosis -1 point, lobular inflammation -1 point, ballooning -1 point21 weekAs assessed on the obtained liver biopsies before and after the treatment
- Differences in EPOS 7-tier staging system score baseline to end of treatment21 weekAs assessed on the obtained liver biopsies before and after the treatment
change in Fibrosis-4 score (Fib-4 score)21 weekBased on blood obtained before and after the treatment
Change in NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS)21 weeksBased on blood obtained before and after the treatment
Change in Liver enzymes21 weeksBased on blood obtained before and after the treatment
Change in Liver synthesis function21 weeksBased on blood obtained before and after the treatment
Change in liver stiffness and liver steatosis (with controlled attenuation parameter) measurement by Fibroscan21 weeksBased on Fibroscan scores obtained before and after the treatment
Change in Glycosylated haemoglobin type A1c (HbA1c)21 weeksBased on blood obtained before and after the treatment
Change in Fasting plasma glucose (FPG)21 weeksBased on blood obtained before and after the treatment
Change in Fasting glucagon21 weeksBased on blood obtained before and after the treatment
Change in Fasting insulin21 weeksBased on blood obtained before and after the treatment
change in Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)21 weeksBased on blood obtained before and after the treatment
Glucose variability (determined by 2 weeks of Freestyle libre at begin and end of the trial.21 weeksBased Freestyle libre data
Change in RAND-36 questionnaires21 weekBased on the questionnaires obtained before and after the treatment
Change in EQ-5D-5L questionnaires21 weekBased on the questionnaires obtained before and after the treatment
Safety endpoints21 weeks* Number of treatment-emergent adverse events during the trial * Number of treatment-emergent myelosuppression * Number of treatment emergent infections * Number of subjects discontinuing treatment due to gastrointestinal adverse events
Effect of dasatinib plus quercetin onweek 21Pulse baseline vs end of treatment (week 21)
Effect of Dasatinib and Quercetin on21 weeksQTC time on ECG baseline versus end of treatment (Week 21)
Change in weight before after treatment21 weeksKG
Effect of Dasatinib and quercetin on21 weeksChanges in systolic blood pressure before and after treatment
Effect of dasatinib and quercetin on21 weeksChanges in diastolic blood pressure before and after treatment
Changes in BMI before and after treatment with dasatinib and quercetin21 weeksBMI (weight /heigt\^2)

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMax Nieuwdorp, MD, PhD

Amsterdam UMC

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 16, 2026