Skip to content

Evaluation of Low-cost Techniques for Detecting Sickle Cell Disease and β-thalassemia in Nepal and Canada

Evaluation of Low-cost Techniques for Detecting Sickle Cell Disease and β-thalassemia in Nepal and Canada

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05506358
Enrollment
145
Registered
2022-08-18
Start date
2022-09-20
Completion date
2023-03-30
Last updated
2024-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Beta-Thalassemia, Sickle Cell-Beta Thalassemia, Sickle Cell Disease, Sickle Cell-SS Disease, Sickle Cell Trait

Keywords

low-cost test, point-of-care diagnostics, automated sickling test, solubility test, HemoTypeSC, Sickle Scan, Gazelle Hb Variant Test, Machine learning, Image database, Red blood cells

Brief summary

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited blood disorder associated with acute illness and organ damage. In high resource settings, early screening and treatment greatly improve quality of life. In low resource settings, however, mortality rate for children is high (50-90%). Low-cost and accurate screening techniques are critical to reducing the burden of the disease, especially in remote/rural settings. The most common and severe form of SCD is sickle cell anemia (SCA), caused by the inheritance of genes causing abnormal forms of hemoglobin (called sickle hemoglobin or hemoglobin S) from both parents. The asymptomatic or carrier form of the disease, known as sickle cell trait (SCT), is caused by the inheritance of only one variant gene from one of the parents. In areas such as Nepal, β-thalassemia (another inherited blood disorder) and SCD are both prevalent, and some combinations of these diseases lead to severe symptoms. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of low-cost point-of-care techniques for screening and detecting sickle cell disease, sickle cell trait, and β-thalassaemia, which will subsequently inform on feasible solutions for detecting the disease in rural, remote, or low-resource settings. One of the goals of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of techniques, such as the sickling test with low-cost microscopy and machine learning, HbS solubility test, commercial lateral-flow assays (HemoTypeSC and Sickle SCAN), and the Gazelle Hb variant test, to supplement or replace gold standard tests (HPLC or electrophoresis), which are expensive, require highly trained personnel, and are not easily accessible in remote/rural settings. The investigators hypothesize that: 1. an automated sickling test (standard sickling test enhanced using low-cost microscopy and machine learning) has a higher overall accuracy than conventional screening techniques (solubility and sickling tests) to detect hemoglobin S in blood samples 2. the automated sickling test can additionally classify SCD, SCT and healthy individuals with a sensitivity greater than 90%, based on morphology changes of red blood cells, unlike conventional sickling or solubility tests that do not distinguish between SCD and SCT cases 3. Gazelle diagnostic device can detect β-thalassaemia and SCD/SCT with an overall accuracy greater than 90%, compared with HPLC as the reference test

Detailed description

Overall, the hypothesis is that an assessment of the performance and accuracies of low-cost point-of-care techniques (automated sickling test, solubility test, lateral-flow assays, Gazelle Hb variant test) against HPLC tests will provide researchers and health workers with feasible alternative options for screening and detecting SCD, SCT and β-thalassaemia in a variety of situations based on the needs of the communities and the resources available. Objectives Objectives specific to the current study are to: 1. Determine accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of automated sickling test to detect HbS, compared to gold standard HPLC, and to conventional solubility test 2. Determine whether SCD, SCT and healthy individuals can be classified using the automated sickling test that leverages machine learning on images of blood films under hypoxia 3. Validate accuracy (\>95% sensitivity and specificity) of lateral- flow assays (HemoTypeSC and Sickle SCAN) to detect SCD/SCT, and of Gazelle variant test to detect SCD, SCT, and β-thalassaemia; and determine if low-cost techniques can potentially replace HPLC/electrophoresis tests in rural and remote settings Long-term objectives of the overall project are to: 1. Implement trained machine learning algorithm to classify SCD, SCT and healthy individuals during screening tests in Nepal 2. Implement relevant low-cost point-of-care techniques in rural and remote communities of Nepal using insights and conclusions from current study The plan of the study to screen the communities (e.g. in Nepalgunj, in Vancouver) using the following: a. Low-cost screening i. Sickling test with low-cost microscope and automated screening with machine learning ii. Sickling test with traditional microscope (conventional manual screening used in Nepal) iii. HbS solubility test iv. Commercial point-of-care assays (HemoTypeSC and Sickle SCAN) v. Gazelle Hb variant test b. Gold standard test: HPLC, for determining the accuracies of low-cost screening techniques De-identified data (images of blood films and associated documentation) will also be deposited in an online public repository, such as the Federated Research Data Repository (FRDR). FRDR is a service of the Digital Research Alliance of Canada (Alliance), a not-for-profit organization that supports digital research infrastructure in Canada. FRDR is hosted on national infrastructure, managed and administered by the Digital Research Alliance of Canada.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTHigh performance liquid chromatography

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using the D10 System by Bio-Rad Laboratories will be used as the gold standard test.

DEVICEAutomated sickling test

The standard sickling test using 2% sodium metabisulphite will be augmented using an automated microscope (such as Octopi) and machine learning, and will be used as one of the low-cost tests.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTHbS solubility test

Standard HbS solubility test currently used in Nepal (e.g. Sicklevue) will be used as one of the low-cost tests

A point-of-care lateral flow assay, HemoTypeSC (https://www.hemotype.com/), will be used as one of the low-cost tests

DEVICESickle SCAN

A point-of-care lateral flow assay, Sickle SCAN (https://www.biomedomics.com/products/hematology/sicklescan/), will be used as one of the low-cost tests

DEVICEGazelle Hb Variant Test

A portable electrophoresis machine, Gazelle diagnostic device (https://hemexhealth.com/), will be used as one of the low-cost tests

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Masking description

All the participants and study team members will be informed of the tests and devices used in the study.

Intervention model description

Around 90 participants will be recruited in Canada - 30 with SCD (HbSS), 30 with SCT (HbAS), and 30 healthy participants (HbAA). Around 120 participants will be recruited in Nepal - 20 with SCD (HbSS), 20 with SCT (HbAS), 20 with sickle cell / β-thalassaemia compound heterozygous form (HbS/β-thalassemia), 20 with β-thalassaemia (Hbβ/ β-thalassemia), 20 with β-thalassaemia trait or carrier form (HbA/β-thalassemia), and 20 healthy participants (HbAA). 3-4 mL of blood will be drawn using standard phlebotomy practices. The following tests will be performed: a. Low-cost tests i. Sickling test with low-cost microscope and automated screening with machine learning ii. Sickling test with traditional microscope (conventional manual screening used in Nepal) iii. HbS solubility test iv. Commercial point-of-care assays (HemoTypeSC and Sickle SCAN) v. Gazelle Hb variant test b. Gold standard test: HPLC, for determining the accuracies of low-cost screening techniques

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Since the techniques evaluated in the study aims at detecting sickle cell disease (SCD), sickle cell trait (SCT), and β- thalassemia, the following number of participants will be included in Nepal: * 20 individuals with SCD (HbSS) * 20 individuals with SCT (HbAS) * 20 individuals with sickle cell/β-thalassemia compound heterozygous form (HbS/β-thalassemia) * 20 individuals with β-thalassemia (Hbβ/β-thalassemia) * 20 individuals with β-thalassemia trait or carrier form (HbA/β- thalassemia) * 20 healthy individual participants or normal participants (HbAA, participants without any known hemoglobin disorders, such as SCD, SCT or β-thalassemia) The following number of participants will be included in Canada: * 30 individuals with SCD (HbSS) * 30 individuals with SCT (HbAS) * 30 healthy individual participants or normal participants (HbAA, participants without any known hemoglobin disorders, such as SCD, SCT or β-thalassemia) Participants older than 1 year of age at the time of drawing blood will be eligible. Signed and dated consent or assent forms will be required by the participants or their parents/guardians.

Exclusion criteria

The

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValuebaselineThe following metrics will be determined for the low-cost tests to be evaluated as indicated below (where TP = true positive, TN = true negative, FP = false positive, FN = false negative): 1. Sensitivity = TP/(TP + FN) 2. Specificity = TN/(FP + TN) 3. Positive predictive value = TP/(TP + FP) 4. Negative predictive value = TN/(TN + FN) These metrics will be calculated for the low-cost technologies against the reference test, HPLC, for detecting the presence of sickle hemoglobin and β- thalassemia. The low-cost technologies include automated sickling test (standard sickling test enhanced using low-cost microscopy and machine learning), solubility test, HemoTypeSC, Sickle SCAN, and Gazelle Hb Variant test. The test results of the low-cost technologies will be compared with those of the reference test to get the values of TP, TN, FP and FN, which will then be used to calculate the metrics listed above.

Countries

Canada, Nepal

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
1) HbSS; 2) HbAS; 3) HbS/β-thalassemia; 4) HbA/β-thalassemia; 5) HbAA
Please note that the demographic information (age, sex) is reported for all different groups combined, and individual analysis of age and sex distribution per group is not performed due to the way the data was collected. In Canada, only averages and ranges for age and sex were collected rather than distribution per group. Number of participants considered in the study: 29 HbSS: homozygous form of sickle cell disease 45 HbAS: heterozygous (carrier) form of sickle cell disease 11 HbS/β-thalassemia: compound heterozygous form of sickle cell disease (with β-thalassemia) 23 HbA/β-thalassemia: β-thalassemia trait (carrier form) 30 HbAA: participants without any known hemoglobin disorders, such as sickle cell disease, sickle cell trait, β-thalassemia, etc.
138
Total138

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyBeta-thalassemia major with transfusion within 2 months00010
Overall StudyHbE trait00010
Overall StudySample hemolysis observed under the microscope00010
Overall StudySickle cell disease with Hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin (HPFH)20000
Overall StudySickle cell disease with transfusion within 3 months20000

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic1) HbSS; 2) HbAS; 3) HbS/β-thalassemia; 4) HbA/β-thalassemia; 5) HbAA
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
33 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
103 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
27 participants
Region of Enrollment
Nepal
111 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
81 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
57 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 290 / 450 / 110 / 230 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 450 / 110 / 230 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 450 / 110 / 230 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value

The following metrics will be determined for the low-cost tests to be evaluated as indicated below (where TP = true positive, TN = true negative, FP = false positive, FN = false negative): 1. Sensitivity = TP/(TP + FN) 2. Specificity = TN/(FP + TN) 3. Positive predictive value = TP/(TP + FP) 4. Negative predictive value = TN/(TN + FN) These metrics will be calculated for the low-cost technologies against the reference test, HPLC, for detecting the presence of sickle hemoglobin and β- thalassemia. The low-cost technologies include automated sickling test (standard sickling test enhanced using low-cost microscopy and machine learning), solubility test, HemoTypeSC, Sickle SCAN, and Gazelle Hb Variant test. The test results of the low-cost technologies will be compared with those of the reference test to get the values of TP, TN, FP and FN, which will then be used to calculate the metrics listed above.

Time frame: baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HbSSSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueHemoTypeSC (NPV)100 percentage
HbSSSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueHemoTypeSC (sensitivity)100 percentage
HbSSSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (sensitivity)96.6 percentage
HbSSSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueHemoTypeSC (specificity)89 percentage
HbSSSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (specificity)89.9 percentage
HbSSSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueSickle SCAN (specificity)89.9 percentage
HbSSSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (PPV)71.8 percentage
HbSSSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueSickle SCAN (sensitivity)100 percentage
HbSSSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (NPV)99 percentage
HbSSSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueSickle SCAN (NPV)100 percentage
HbASSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (NPV)100 percentage
HbASSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueHemoTypeSC (NPV)98.9 percentage
HbASSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueHemoTypeSC (sensitivity)97.8 percentage
HbASSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (PPV)100 percentage
HbASSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueHemoTypeSC (specificity)100 percentage
HbASSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueSickle SCAN (NPV)100 percentage
HbASSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueSickle SCAN (sensitivity)100 percentage
HbASSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (specificity)100 percentage
HbASSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (sensitivity)100 percentage
HbASSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueSickle SCAN (specificity)100 percentage
HbS/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueSickle SCAN (specificity)100 percentage
HbS/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (sensitivity)0 percentage
HbS/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (specificity)99.2 percentage
HbS/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (PPV)0 percentage
HbS/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (NPV)92 percentage
HbS/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueHemoTypeSC (sensitivity)0 percentage
HbS/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueHemoTypeSC (specificity)100 percentage
HbS/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueHemoTypeSC (NPV)92 percentage
HbS/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueSickle SCAN (sensitivity)0 percentage
HbS/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueSickle SCAN (NPV)92 percentage
HbA/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (NPV)98.3 percentage
HbA/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueHemoTypeSC (NPV)83.3 percentage
HbA/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (specificity)99.1 percentage
HbA/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (PPV)95.5 percentage
HbA/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueSickle SCAN (specificity)100 percentage
HbA/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueSickle SCAN (NPV)83.3 percentage
HbA/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueSickle SCAN (sensitivity)0 percentage
HbA/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueHemoTypeSC (sensitivity)0 percentage
HbA/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (sensitivity)91.3 percentage
HbA/β-thalassemiaSensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueHemoTypeSC (specificity)100 percentage
HbAASensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueSickle SCAN (sensitivity)100 percentage
HbAASensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (NPV)99.1 percentage
HbAASensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueSickle SCAN (NPV)100 percentage
HbAASensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueHemoTypeSC (NPV)100 percentage
HbAASensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (PPV)93.5 percentage
HbAASensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueHemoTypeSC (specificity)78.7 percentage
HbAASensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (specificity)98.1 percentage
HbAASensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueGazelle (sensitivity)96.7 percentage
HbAASensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueSickle SCAN (specificity)78.7 percentage
HbAASensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive ValueHemoTypeSC (sensitivity)100 percentage

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 6, 2026