Skip to content

Randomized Clinical Study Comparing SynPath to Standard of Care in Treatment of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers

A Prospective, Multicenter, Open Label, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study Evaluating the Effect of NovoSorb ® SynPath™ Dermal Matrix Compared to Standard of Care (SOC) In the Treatment of Nonresponsive, Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05506215
Acronym
DFUs
Enrollment
25
Registered
2022-08-18
Start date
2022-07-10
Completion date
2024-02-26
Last updated
2024-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Foot Ulcer, Diabetic Foot, Foot Ulcer, Wound Healing

Keywords

Ulcer, Diabetic, Acellular Dermal Matrix Template, Diabetes Complications

Brief summary

The study will evaluate the efficacy of SynPath™, a synthetic dermal matrix, in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in subjects with diabetes mellitus versus Standard of Care treatment. Half the subjects with be treated using SynPath™ while the other half will receive Standard of Care treatment

Detailed description

One hundred and thirty-eight (138) subjects with chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers ranging in size from 1cm2 to 25cm2 will be randomized 1:1 to either SynPath™ or Standard of Care after the completion of a 14 day screening/run-in period. Following the of run-in period the subjects with a 'hard to heal' or chronic, (\>4 weeks) nonresponsive Wagner Grade 1 or 2 diabetic foot ulcer will be randomized to receive either SynPath™ or SOC treatment. Both treatment groups will require subjects to use off-loading device.

Interventions

DEVICESynPath Acellular Dermal Matrix plus Off-loading Device

Application of SynPath

DEVICEWound Dressing composed of 90% collagen and 10% Alginate plus Off-loading Device

Application Wound Dressing composed of Collagen and Alginate

Sponsors

PolyNovo Biomaterials Pty Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female ≥ 18 years 2. A signed and dated informed consent form has been obtained from the subject 3. Confirmed Type 1 or 2 diabetes with a hemoglobin HbA1c ≤12% within 90 days of informed consent 4. Current reference ulcer has been in existence for longer than four (4) weeks with confirmed failure of a prior treatment to heal the ulcer, prior to signing informed consent for trial participation. Verbal statement from prior treating clinician or patient can be used as confirmation of treatment failure. 5. Reference ulcer has been diagnosed as either a partial or full thickness diabetic foot ulcer without tunneling, undermining, sinus tracts or /exposed bone, with a scale rating of a Wagner Grade 1 or Wagner Grade 2 extended to ligament, tendon, and joint capsule with no bone exposure 6. Ulcer is either located on the foot or ankle with at least 50% of ulcer below medial aspect of the malleolus 7. Ulcer size (area) ≥1cm² and ≤25cm² post-debridement at both screening visit 1 and at baseline/randomization visit 3 8. There is a minimum 1cm margin between the qualifying reference study ulcer and any other ulcers on the specified foot, post debridement 9. Subject has adequate vascular perfusion of the affected limb, as defined by at least one of the following: 1. Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) ≥ 0.65 or ≤1.2 2. Toe pressure (plethysmography) \>50mmHg 3. TcPO2 \>40mmHg 4. Or as an alternative, the arterial Doppler ultrasound can be performed evaluating for biphasic dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial vessels at the level of the ankle or a TBI (Toe Brachial Index) of \> 0.6 is acceptable. 10. Subject or responsible caregiver is willing and able to adhere to schedule of required applicable dressing changes as well as off-loading for the location of the reference ulcer 11. Subject is able and willing to comply with study procedures 12. Females of childbearing potential must be willing to use acceptable methods of contraception (birth control pills, barriers, or abstinence) during the course of the study and undergo pregnancy tests. 13. A two-(2) week run-in period will Standard of Care treatment plus required offloading precede randomization in the trial to document the indolent nature of the subject's selected selected. The subject may be randomized if the reference ulcer has not reduced in area \>30% from screening visit 1 to baseline/randomization visit 3.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject was previously randomized and treated under this clinical study protocol 2. Subject has suspected or confirmed signs/symptoms of gangrene or wound infection as evidenced by redness, pain, and purulent drainage on any part of the index limb as confirmed by X-ray or biopsy 3. Subject has a history of hypersensitivity to polyurethane, as determined by prior medical history 4. Subject has participated in another clinical trial involving a device or a systemically administered investigational study drug/treatment within 30 days of randomization 5. Subject has received, or is scheduled to receive a medication or treatment which is known to interfere with or affect the rate or quality of wound healing within 30 days of signing the informed consent form 6. Subject has a history of bone cancer or metastatic disease on the index limb, radiation therapy to the foot, or has had chemotherapy within twelve (12) months prior to signing informed consent form for trial participation 7. Reference ulcer, in the clinical opinion of the investigator, is suspicious for cancer and should undergo an ulcer biopsy to rule out a carcinoma of the ulcer 8. Subject has a condition that would interfere with their ability to adhere with the treatment regimen or has a known history of poor adherence with medical treatment 9. In the opinion of the Investigator, the subject has a history of or is currently diagnosed with any illnesses or conditions, other than diabetes, that could interfere with wound healing such as auto-immune disorders, end-stage renal disease, severe malnutrition, liver disease or connective tissue disorders 10. In the clinical opinion of the Investigator, the subject has an active or unstable Charcot foot 11. Subject has ulcers secondary to a disease other than diabetes (e.g., vasculitis, neoplasms, or hematological disorders) 12. In the clinical opinion of the Investigator, the subject has excessive lymphoedema that could interfere with off-loading and/or wound healing 13. Subject with an active infection at the reference ulcer 14. Subject has a non-healed surgical site from a prior amputation located in the index limb that has been open for less than 30 days 15. Subject has been treated with wound dressings that include growth factors, engineered tissues or skin substitutes within 30 days of randomization or is scheduled to receive treatment during the study 16. Subject has been treated with hyperbaric oxygen or topical oxygen therapy within five (5) days of the Screening Visit or is scheduled to receive hyperbaric oxygen treatment or topical oxygen therapy during the study 17. Subject has been treated with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) within 72 hours of the Screening Visit 18. Subject receiving dialysis treatment: hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis 19. Subject has received an organ transplant 20. Subjects with a history of more than two (2) weeks treatment with immunosuppressants including prednisone 10 mg daily or an equivalent dose of other oral steroids, or application of topical steroids to the ulcer surface within one (1) month prior to first Screening Visit, or who receive such medications during the screening period, or who are anticipated to require such medications during the course of the study 21. Active osteomyelitis or bone infection of the index foot. A subject may be enrolled in study if the subject: 1. is at least 8 weeks post osteomyelitis diagnosis 2. has been treated appropriately 3. has only intact joint capsule exposed with no bone exposure 22. Subjects presenting with an ulcer probing to bone (Wagner Grade 3) 23. Subject is currently pregnant or actively trying to conceive.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of ulcer closed at 12 weeks12 weeksComplete wound closure was defined as 100% re-epithelialization of the ulcer surface without drainage or dressing requirements confirmed at 2 consecutive study visits 2 weeks apart

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of closure rates for each treatment group12 weeksComparison of rates of wound closure between Standard of Care and SynPath
Percent Wound Area Reduction(PWAR) over 12 weeks12 WeeksThe Change in percentage wound reduction(PWVR) over 12 weeks for each treatment group
Percentage of ulcers that achieved 50% or greater closure rate within 6 weeks6 weeksThe percentage of ulcers that achieve 50% or greater closure
Change in reported Pain Levels between each treatment group12 weeksChange in subject reported pain levels using the 0-10 Numerical Pain Scale
The type and number of serious adverse events experienced12 weeksComparison of the type and number of serious adverse events experience for each treatment group
Cost of treatment in each treatment group12 weeksCalculation of cost of treatment including number of device applications for each treatment group

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026