Skip to content

Community Medical Center, Continuous Quality Improvement Project, Rapid Sequence Intubation

Community Medical Center, Continuous Quality Improvement Project, Rapid Sequence Intubation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05505799
Enrollment
700
Registered
2022-08-18
Start date
2022-07-07
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2025-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Checklist, Intubation, Intratracheal, Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation

Brief summary

To assess the ongoing continuous quality improvement of rapid sequence intubation in our emergency department. Ongoing assessment will address standardization of the process and protocol driven measures that will improve the overall quality of the intervention.

Detailed description

Continuous evaluation and improvement of airway performance in the Emergency Department (ED) is essential for achieving positive clinical outcomes and reducing the incidence of related adverse events. First-pass success (FPS) in Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) is the most commonly utilized metric for evaluation and allows for comparison across clinical environments. According to a variety of studies published over the last decade, including a large, multi-center systematic review and meta-analysis, the mean FPS rate (84%) has been used as an institutional benchmark for ED airway proficiency. Unfortunately, many complications can arise during RSI, the incidence of which has remained high. These complications commonly lead to poor or life-threatening outcomes and include desaturation, hypotension, dysrhythmia, cardiac arrest, pneumothorax, dental trauma, and esophageal intubation. According to the 4th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anesthetists, it was determined that 30% of patients in the ED and 60% of patients in the ICU experiencing an airway related incident, suffered brain damage or death. The number of failed intubation attempts (3+) has been directly correlated with the an increased development of complications. Thus, establishing effective methods of decreasing the occurrence of failed attempts will result in an immediate reduction of unintended issues. To maximize FPS and increase the safety of the procedure, it is essential to develop a tool to maximize efficacy. The introduction of checklists as a process improvement tool has been identified as a successful strategy for improving the effectiveness and quality of procedures throughout healthcare. Integration of a checklist in the RSI procedure will help to increase FPS rates and act as a method to aid in continuous evaluation and improvement of overall airway performance. Although many airway performance improvement studies exist, our institution is unique in that we are a new Emergency Medicine (EM) Residency program that will be comprised of only post-graduate year 1 (PGY1) and post-graduate year 2 (PGY2) EM residents at the commencement of data collection. Furthermore, our clinical skills training process involves an integrative approach, pioneered by our interdisciplinary team of educators. Continuous evaluation of FPS and the incidence of RSI-related complications will allow for assessment of not only our quality improvement initiative, but of our educational methodology as well. Overall, implementation of quality and performance improvement strategies can mitigate the occurrence of adverse events and lead to improved health outcomes for our patients. This is of paramount importance to us as providers and to our community as a whole.

Interventions

OTHERIntubation Checklist

A preprocedure checklist will be made available to clinicians, and they will be educated on proper use of the checklist

OTHERStandard Care

Clinicians will intubate as per their usual practice

Sponsors

Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Before and After study of a Checklist Intervention

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any patient undergoing endotracheal intubation in the Emergency department

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years old

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First Pass Success RateAt time of intubationProportion of intubations where the trachea is successfully intubated on the first attempt

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cardiac arrestAt time of intubationProportion of intubations where patients suffer cardiac arrest
Cuff LeakAt time of intubationProportion of intubations where the endotracheal tube experiences a cuff leak
Dental traumaAt time of intubationProportion of intubations where patients suffer dental trauma
DysrhythmiaAt time of intubationProportion of intubations where patients suffer dysrhythmia
Esophageal intubationAt time of intubationProportion of intubations where patients encounter esophageal intubation
Aspiration rateAt time of intubationProportion of intubations where patients suffer aspiration
Post procedural hypotensionAt time of intubationProportion of intubations where patients suffer hypotension in the immediate postprocedure period
HypoxemiaAt time of intubationProportion of intubations where patients suffer hypoxemia
LaryngospasmAt time of intubationProportion of intubations where patients suffer laryngospasm
Mainstem intubationAt time of intubationProportion of intubations where patients encounter a mainstem intubation
Unplanned extubationAt time of intubationProportion of intubations where patients encounter an unplanned extubation

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026