Skip to content

A Comprehensive HIV Prevention Package for South African Adolescent Girls and Young Women: IMARA SA

Multilevel Comprehensive HIV Prevention Package for South African Adolescent Girls and Young Women

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05504954
Acronym
IMARA-SA pilot
Enrollment
61
Registered
2022-08-17
Start date
2019-10-26
Completion date
2021-05-15
Last updated
2025-08-22

For informational purposes only โ€” not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hiv, Sexually Transmitted Infection

Keywords

HIV prevention, Adolescent girls and young women, South Africa, Mother-daughter intervention

Brief summary

Programs which go beyond individual-level behavior change to reduce HIV and STI infections among adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa are essential to meet global HIV targets. Informed, Motivated, Aware and Responsible Adolescents and Adults- South Africa (IMARA-SA) is an evidence-based HIV-prevention intervention for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) and their female caregivers, which has been adapted for a South African audience. This pilot study will assess feasibility in preparation for a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Additionally, the pilot will examine the preliminary effectiveness of IMARA-SA in reducing sexually transmitted infections (STI) and increasing uptake of HIV testing and counseling (HTC) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) at follow-up among AGYW. About 60 AGYW-FC dyads will be enrolled and randomized to IMARA-SA or a health-promotion control arm. Following randomization, the dyads will participate in an \ 2-day group workshop (\ 10 hours), which includes joint and separate mother and daughter activities. AGYW and FC will complete baseline assessments and follow-up assessments approximately 6 months later. Assessments will include surveys, STIs testing (for chlamydia and gonorrhea), and uptake of HTC and a 1-month PrEP prescription. Additionally, the intervention's implementation (e.g., acceptability) will be explored.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALIMARA-SA (intervention group)

The IMARA-SA intervention aligns with an ecological framework, emphasizing the intersection of individual, social, and structural determinants of women's sexual health and behavior. Separate FC and AGYW groups run simultaneously and cover parallel content, while joint activities enhance FC credibility as a resource for HIV/STI prevention and facilitate practice of communication skills. Interventionists use interactive and experiential activities. IMARA-SA's goals and motto emphasize strong FC-AGYW relationships, sisterhood, community empowerment, and motivation for HIV prevention, and build group cohesion. FC and AGYW sign a pact to confirm commitment to the program. At the end of Workshop Day 1, participants receive homework to complete during the week. Woven throughout IMARA-SA is the impact of mental health issues, alcohol and drug use, and violence on HIV-risk.

The health promotion control intervention is a family-based intervention previously delivered to families in SA and translated into isiXhosa. The intervention promotes healthy living by encouraging good nutrition, exercise, and violence reduction. It will be delivered in the same format as IMARA and will be identical in length and intensity.

Sponsors

Desmond Tutu HIV Centre
CollaboratorOTHER
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Illinois at Chicago
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Adolescent girl and young women-female caregiver (AGYW-FC) dyads will be randomized to the IMARA-SA intervention arm or a health promotion control arm matched in time and intensity. IMARA-SA and the health promotion program will be delivered as group interventions.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
15 Years to 19 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

for AGYW include: 1. Black or mixed race; 2. 15-19 years-old; 3. residing in Klipfontein/Mitchells Plain (K/MP); 4. speak isiXhosa or English or a combination of these languages. Inclusion criteria for FC include: 1. identified by AGYW as a FC; 2. 24 years and older; 3. living with or in daily contact with the AGYW; 4. speak isiXhosa or English or a combination of these languages.

Exclusion criteria

AGYW will be excluded from the study if they do not have a FC to participate in the study. AGYW and FC will be excluded from the study if they: 1. are unable to understand the consent/assent process and provide written informed consent; 2. are currently enrolled in another research study addressing HIV/STIs/PrEP; 3. participated in the IMARA-SA adaptation process. AGYW and FC must agree to participate as a dyad. AGYW refusal will supersede FC consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of AGYW Who Tested Positive for a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI)8-17 months post baselineA positive test for at least one of two STIs: chlamydia and/or gonorrhea
Number of AGYW Completing HIV Testing and Counseling (HTC)8-17 months post baselineCompletion of HIV Testing and Counseling (HTC)
Number of AGYW Who Elected to Take Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)8-17 months post baselineUptake of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) assessed as receipt of PrEP prescription from research team or other care provider after the baseline survey.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AGYW Substance Use During Sex in the Past 6 Months6-10 months post baselineSelf-reported number of times had vaginal or anal sex while drinking or taking drugs in the past 6-months using the AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA).
AGYW's Report of Adherence to PrEP6-10 months post baselineAdherence to PrEP is measured using an adapted version of the Wilson scale (2017). Measure Description: (0=low adherence to 100=high adherence) Scale is comprised of 3 items: number of days dose missed, how often did you take PrEP in the way you were supposed to, how good a job did you do at taking PrEP. Items were transformed to a 0-100 scale and averaged. Thirty was subtracted from number of days missed and multiplied by 3.33. Responses for remaining 2 items: never/very poor=0, rarely/poor=20, sometimes/fair=40, usually/good=60, almost always/very good=80, always/excellent=100.
Number of Partners in the Past 6 Months6-10 months post baselineSelf-reported number of vaginal or anal sex partners in the past 6-months using the AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA).
AGYW Condom Use at Last Sex6-10 months post baselineSelf-reported condom use at last vaginal or anal sex using the AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA).
AGYW Consistency of Condom Use6-10 months post baselineSelf-reported consistency of condom use during vaginal and anal sex in the past 6-months using the AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop?Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2Single item: How honest did you feel you could be during today's workshop? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.
Intervention FidelitySame day the IMARA intervention was conductedNumber of IMARA intervention activities completed as planned.
Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities?Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2Single item: How much did you feel you were involved or engaged in the activities? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.
Intervention ReachEnrollmentThe number of dyads who were eligible and consented/assented to participate in the study.
Intervention Feasibility: Completed the First Intervention Day of IMARABaselineThe number of dyads in the IMARA-SA group who attend at least one IMARA-SA session
Intervention Feasibility: Completed the Second Intervention Day of IMARABaselineThe number of dyads in the IMARA-SA group who attended the second IMARA-SA session
Intervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today?Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2Single item: How knowledgeable were your group leaders about the information presented today? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.
Intervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop?Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2Single item: How satisfied were you with today's workshop? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.
Intervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today?Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2Single item: How comfortable were you with the group leaders who worked with you today? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.
Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said?Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2Single item: How much did you feel the group leaders valued what you said? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.

Countries

South Africa

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

61 dyads were enrolled. Two dyads were withdrawn due to ineligibility. A total of 118 participants (59 dyads) were allocated to either IMARA-SA or the Health Promotion Control Arm.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IMARA-SA Intervention Arm
IMARA-SA (intervention group): The IMARA-SA intervention aligns with an ecological framework, emphasizing the intersection of individual, social, and structural determinants of women's sexual health and behavior. Separate FC and AGYW groups run simultaneously and cover parallel content, while joint activities enhance FC credibility as a resource for HIV/STI prevention and facilitate practice of communication skills. Interventionists use interactive and experiential activities. IMARA-SA's goals and motto emphasize strong FC-AGYW relationships, sisterhood, community empowerment, and motivation for HIV prevention, and build group cohesion. FC and AGYW sign a pact to confirm commitment to the program. At the end of Workshop Day 1, participants receive homework to complete during the week. Woven throughout IMARA-SA is the impact of mental health issues, alcohol and drug use, and violence on HIV-risk.
58
Health Promotion Control Arm
Health promotion control group: The health promotion control intervention is a family-based intervention previously delivered to families in SA and translated into isiXhosa. The intervention promotes healthy living by encouraging good nutrition, exercise, and violence reduction. It will be delivered in the same format as IMARA and will be identical in length and intensity.
60
Total118

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHealth Promotion Control ArmIMARA-SA Intervention ArmTotal
Age, Customized
AGYW Age
15-17 years old
17 Participants17 Participants34 Participants
Age, Customized
AGYW Age
18-19 years old
13 Participants12 Participants25 Participants
Age, Customized
FC Age
24-29 years old
6 Participants11 Participants17 Participants
Age, Customized
FC Age
30-39 years old
13 Participants9 Participants22 Participants
Age, Customized
FC Age
40-49 years old
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Age, Customized
FC Age
50 and older
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Age, Customized
FC Age
Missing Data
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
AGYW age at first sex15.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.93
15.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
15.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.01
AGYW highest education achieved
Higher education
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
AGYW highest education achieved
Some or all of primary school
11 Participants11 Participants22 Participants
AGYW highest education achieved
Some or all of secondary
15 Participants18 Participants33 Participants
AGYW report of female caregiver participating
Aunt
10 Participants6 Participants16 Participants
AGYW report of female caregiver participating
Biological mother
12 Participants12 Participants24 Participants
AGYW report of female caregiver participating
Cousin
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
AGYW report of female caregiver participating
Grandmother
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
AGYW report of female caregiver participating
Other
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
AGYW report of female caregiver participating
Sister
4 Participants7 Participants11 Participants
AGYW's Report of Adherence to PrEP69.1 score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.1
75.0 score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9
70.8 score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.5
AGYW supported self financially in past year7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
FC highest education level acheived
Higher education
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
FC highest education level acheived
Missing Data
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
FC highest education level acheived
No schooling
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
FC highest education level acheived
Some or all of primary school
12 Participants9 Participants21 Participants
FC highest education level acheived
Some or all of secondary
12 Participants13 Participants25 Participants
FC supported self financially in the past year24 Participants23 Participants47 Participants
Number of AGYW Completing HIV Testing and Counseling (HTC)28 Participants28 Participants56 Participants
Number of AGYW reporting did not use a condom at last sex7 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Number of AGYW reporting ever had sex19 Participants20 Participants39 Participants
Number of AGYW who have had sex in past 6 months14 Participants12 Participants26 Participants
Number of AGYW who report 2 or more partners in the past 6 months5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Number of AGYW who report using condoms inconsistently in past 6 months10 Participants4 Participants14 Participants
Number of AGYW who report using substances during sex in past 6 months10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Number of AGYW who tested positive for a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI)9 Participants12 Participants21 Participants
Number of AGYW who were ever prescribed PrEP5 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collectedโ€”โ€”0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
60 participants58 participants118 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
60 Participants58 Participants118 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 290 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Number of AGYW Completing HIV Testing and Counseling (HTC)

Completion of HIV Testing and Counseling (HTC)

Time frame: 8-17 months post baseline

Population: Denominator is those who came to site for HTC at follow-up and were not living with HIV (39 came to site for follow-up, 2 were living with HIV and were removed).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmNumber of AGYW Completing HIV Testing and Counseling (HTC)20 Participants
Health Promotion Control ArmNumber of AGYW Completing HIV Testing and Counseling (HTC)17 Participants
Primary

Number of AGYW Who Elected to Take Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

Uptake of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) assessed as receipt of PrEP prescription from research team or other care provider after the baseline survey.

Time frame: 8-17 months post baseline

Population: Denominator is those who completed follow-up surveys, were not living with HIV, and did not report having been prescribed PrEP at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmNumber of AGYW Who Elected to Take Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)17 Participants
Health Promotion Control ArmNumber of AGYW Who Elected to Take Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)9 Participants
p-value: 0.195% CI: [0.81, 9.89]Regression, Logistic
Primary

Number of AGYW Who Tested Positive for a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI)

A positive test for at least one of two STIs: chlamydia and/or gonorrhea

Time frame: 8-17 months post baseline

Population: Data represents AGYW. Denominator is those who completed STI testing at follow-up. Excludes one participant who completed STI testing at follow-up but did not receive STI treatment at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmNumber of AGYW Who Tested Positive for a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI)4 Participants
Health Promotion Control ArmNumber of AGYW Who Tested Positive for a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI)6 Participants
p-value: 0.1595% CI: [0.04, 1.59]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

AGYW Condom Use at Last Sex

Self-reported condom use at last vaginal or anal sex using the AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA).

Time frame: 6-10 months post baseline

Population: Denominator includes AGYW who reported sex in the past 6 months at follow-up.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmAGYW Condom Use at Last SexYes10 Participants
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmAGYW Condom Use at Last SexNo8 Participants
Health Promotion Control ArmAGYW Condom Use at Last SexYes4 Participants
Health Promotion Control ArmAGYW Condom Use at Last SexNo5 Participants
p-value: 0.7Fisher Exact
Secondary

AGYW Consistency of Condom Use

Self-reported consistency of condom use during vaginal and anal sex in the past 6-months using the AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA).

Time frame: 6-10 months post baseline

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmAGYW Consistency of Condom UseAlways10 Participants
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmAGYW Consistency of Condom UseLess than always8 Participants
Health Promotion Control ArmAGYW Consistency of Condom UseAlways4 Participants
Health Promotion Control ArmAGYW Consistency of Condom UseLess than always5 Participants
p-value: 0.7Fisher Exact
Secondary

AGYW's Report of Adherence to PrEP

Adherence to PrEP is measured using an adapted version of the Wilson scale (2017). Measure Description: (0=low adherence to 100=high adherence) Scale is comprised of 3 items: number of days dose missed, how often did you take PrEP in the way you were supposed to, how good a job did you do at taking PrEP. Items were transformed to a 0-100 scale and averaged. Thirty was subtracted from number of days missed and multiplied by 3.33. Responses for remaining 2 items: never/very poor=0, rarely/poor=20, sometimes/fair=40, usually/good=60, almost always/very good=80, always/excellent=100.

Time frame: 6-10 months post baseline

Population: Denominator is those who reported being prescribed PrEP on the follow-up survey and not on the baseline survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmAGYW's Report of Adherence to PrEP60.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
Health Promotion Control ArmAGYW's Report of Adherence to PrEP54.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.8
p-value: 0.6595% CI: [-17.78, 27.78]Regression, Linear
Secondary

AGYW Substance Use During Sex in the Past 6 Months

Self-reported number of times had vaginal or anal sex while drinking or taking drugs in the past 6-months using the AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA).

Time frame: 6-10 months post baseline

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmAGYW Substance Use During Sex in the Past 6 MonthsNever9 Participants
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmAGYW Substance Use During Sex in the Past 6 Months1+ time9 Participants
Health Promotion Control ArmAGYW Substance Use During Sex in the Past 6 MonthsNever4 Participants
Health Promotion Control ArmAGYW Substance Use During Sex in the Past 6 Months1+ time5 Participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Partners in the Past 6 Months

Self-reported number of vaginal or anal sex partners in the past 6-months using the AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA).

Time frame: 6-10 months post baseline

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmNumber of Partners in the Past 6 Months1 partner14 Participants
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmNumber of Partners in the Past 6 Months2+ partners4 Participants
Health Promotion Control ArmNumber of Partners in the Past 6 Months1 partner8 Participants
Health Promotion Control ArmNumber of Partners in the Past 6 Months2+ partners1 Participants
p-value: 0.64Fisher Exact
Other Pre-specified

Intervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today?

Single item: How comfortable were you with the group leaders who worked with you today? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.

Time frame: Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2

Population: 29 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to IMARA-SA: 26 dyads completed Day 1 and 22 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 6 AGYW who completed Day 1 and 1 FC who completed Day 2.~30 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to Health Promotion: 28 dyads completed Day 1 and 27 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 2 AGYW and 3 FC who completed Day 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today?AGYW Day 14.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today?FC Day 14.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today?AGYW Day 24.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today?FC Day 24.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today?FC Day 24.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today?AGYW Day 14.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today?AGYW Day 24.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today?FC Day 14.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Other Pre-specified

Intervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop?

Single item: How honest did you feel you could be during today's workshop? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.

Time frame: Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2

Population: 29 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to IMARA-SA: 26 dyads completed Day 1 and 22 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 6 AGYW who completed Day 1 and 1 FC who completed Day 2.~30 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to Health Promotion: 28 dyads completed Day 1 and 27 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 2 AGYW and 3 FC who completed Day 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop?AGYW Day 24.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop?FC Day 14.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop?FC Day 24.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop?AGYW Day 14.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop?FC Day 25.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop?FC Day 14.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop?AGYW Day 24.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop?AGYW Day 14.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Other Pre-specified

Intervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today?

Single item: How knowledgeable were your group leaders about the information presented today? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.

Time frame: Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2

Population: 29 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to IMARA-SA: 26 dyads completed Day 1 and 22 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 6 AGYW who completed Day 1 and 1 FC who completed Day 2.~30 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to Health Promotion: 28 dyads completed Day 1 and 27 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 2 AGYW and 3 FC who completed Day 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today?AGYW Day 14.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today?FC Day 14.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today?AGYW Day 24.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today?FC Day 24.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today?FC Day 24.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today?AGYW Day 14.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today?AGYW Day 24.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today?FC Day 14.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Other Pre-specified

Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said?

Single item: How much did you feel the group leaders valued what you said? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.

Time frame: Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2

Population: 29 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to IMARA-SA: 26 dyads completed Day 1 and 22 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 6 AGYW who completed Day 1 and 1 FC who completed Day 2.~30 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to Health Promotion: 28 dyads completed Day 1 and 27 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 2 AGYW and 3 FC who completed Day 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said?AGYW Day 14.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said?FC Day 14.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said?AGYW Day 24.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said?FC Day 24.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said?FC Day 24.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said?AGYW Day 14.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said?AGYW Day 24.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said?FC Day 14.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Other Pre-specified

Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities?

Single item: How much did you feel you were involved or engaged in the activities? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.

Time frame: Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2

Population: 29 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to IMARA-SA: 26 dyads completed Day 1 and 22 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 6 AGYW who completed Day 1, 1 AGYW who completed Day 2, and 1 FC who completed Day 2.~30 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to Health Promotion: 28 dyads completed Day 1 and 27 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 2 AGYW and 3 FC who completed Day 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities?AGYW Day 14.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities?FC Day 14.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities?AGYW Day 24.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities?FC Day 24.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities?FC Day 24.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities?AGYW Day 14.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities?AGYW Day 24.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities?FC Day 14.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Other Pre-specified

Intervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop?

Single item: How satisfied were you with today's workshop? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.

Time frame: Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2

Population: 29 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to IMARA-SA: 26 dyads completed Day 1 and 22 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 6 AGYW who completed Day 1 and 1 FC who completed Day 2.~30 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to Health Promotion: 28 dyads completed Day 1 and 27 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 2 AGYW and 3 FC who completed Day 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop?AGYW Day 14.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop?FC Day 14.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop?AGYW Day 24.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop?FC Day 24.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop?FC Day 25.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop?AGYW Day 14.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop?AGYW Day 24.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Health Promotion Control ArmIntervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop?FC Day 14.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Other Pre-specified

Intervention Feasibility: Completed the First Intervention Day of IMARA

The number of dyads in the IMARA-SA group who attend at least one IMARA-SA session

Time frame: Baseline

Population: The number of dyads in the IMARA-SA group who attend at least one IMARA-SA session

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Feasibility: Completed the First Intervention Day of IMARA26 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Intervention Feasibility: Completed the Second Intervention Day of IMARA

The number of dyads in the IMARA-SA group who attended the second IMARA-SA session

Time frame: Baseline

Population: The number of dyads in the IMARA-SA group who attended the second IMARA-SA session

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Feasibility: Completed the Second Intervention Day of IMARA22 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Intervention Fidelity

Number of IMARA intervention activities completed as planned.

Time frame: Same day the IMARA intervention was conducted

Population: Proportion of IMARA intervention activities completed as planned. Fidelity was not measured for the health promotion control group. The number of units analyzed is the total number of activities in the IMARA intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Fidelity199 Number of IMARA intervention activities
Other Pre-specified

Intervention Reach

The number of dyads who were eligible and consented/assented to participate in the study.

Time frame: Enrollment

Population: Data represents number of dyads who were eligible and enrolled.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IMARA-SA Intervention ArmIntervention Reach59 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ยท Data processed: Feb 10, 2026