Hiv, Sexually Transmitted Infection
Conditions
Keywords
HIV prevention, Adolescent girls and young women, South Africa, Mother-daughter intervention
Brief summary
Programs which go beyond individual-level behavior change to reduce HIV and STI infections among adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa are essential to meet global HIV targets. Informed, Motivated, Aware and Responsible Adolescents and Adults- South Africa (IMARA-SA) is an evidence-based HIV-prevention intervention for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) and their female caregivers, which has been adapted for a South African audience. This pilot study will assess feasibility in preparation for a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Additionally, the pilot will examine the preliminary effectiveness of IMARA-SA in reducing sexually transmitted infections (STI) and increasing uptake of HIV testing and counseling (HTC) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) at follow-up among AGYW. About 60 AGYW-FC dyads will be enrolled and randomized to IMARA-SA or a health-promotion control arm. Following randomization, the dyads will participate in an \ 2-day group workshop (\ 10 hours), which includes joint and separate mother and daughter activities. AGYW and FC will complete baseline assessments and follow-up assessments approximately 6 months later. Assessments will include surveys, STIs testing (for chlamydia and gonorrhea), and uptake of HTC and a 1-month PrEP prescription. Additionally, the intervention's implementation (e.g., acceptability) will be explored.
Interventions
The IMARA-SA intervention aligns with an ecological framework, emphasizing the intersection of individual, social, and structural determinants of women's sexual health and behavior. Separate FC and AGYW groups run simultaneously and cover parallel content, while joint activities enhance FC credibility as a resource for HIV/STI prevention and facilitate practice of communication skills. Interventionists use interactive and experiential activities. IMARA-SA's goals and motto emphasize strong FC-AGYW relationships, sisterhood, community empowerment, and motivation for HIV prevention, and build group cohesion. FC and AGYW sign a pact to confirm commitment to the program. At the end of Workshop Day 1, participants receive homework to complete during the week. Woven throughout IMARA-SA is the impact of mental health issues, alcohol and drug use, and violence on HIV-risk.
The health promotion control intervention is a family-based intervention previously delivered to families in SA and translated into isiXhosa. The intervention promotes healthy living by encouraging good nutrition, exercise, and violence reduction. It will be delivered in the same format as IMARA and will be identical in length and intensity.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Adolescent girl and young women-female caregiver (AGYW-FC) dyads will be randomized to the IMARA-SA intervention arm or a health promotion control arm matched in time and intensity. IMARA-SA and the health promotion program will be delivered as group interventions.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
for AGYW include: 1. Black or mixed race; 2. 15-19 years-old; 3. residing in Klipfontein/Mitchells Plain (K/MP); 4. speak isiXhosa or English or a combination of these languages. Inclusion criteria for FC include: 1. identified by AGYW as a FC; 2. 24 years and older; 3. living with or in daily contact with the AGYW; 4. speak isiXhosa or English or a combination of these languages.
Exclusion criteria
AGYW will be excluded from the study if they do not have a FC to participate in the study. AGYW and FC will be excluded from the study if they: 1. are unable to understand the consent/assent process and provide written informed consent; 2. are currently enrolled in another research study addressing HIV/STIs/PrEP; 3. participated in the IMARA-SA adaptation process. AGYW and FC must agree to participate as a dyad. AGYW refusal will supersede FC consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of AGYW Who Tested Positive for a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) | 8-17 months post baseline | A positive test for at least one of two STIs: chlamydia and/or gonorrhea |
| Number of AGYW Completing HIV Testing and Counseling (HTC) | 8-17 months post baseline | Completion of HIV Testing and Counseling (HTC) |
| Number of AGYW Who Elected to Take Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) | 8-17 months post baseline | Uptake of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) assessed as receipt of PrEP prescription from research team or other care provider after the baseline survey. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| AGYW Substance Use During Sex in the Past 6 Months | 6-10 months post baseline | Self-reported number of times had vaginal or anal sex while drinking or taking drugs in the past 6-months using the AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA). |
| AGYW's Report of Adherence to PrEP | 6-10 months post baseline | Adherence to PrEP is measured using an adapted version of the Wilson scale (2017). Measure Description: (0=low adherence to 100=high adherence) Scale is comprised of 3 items: number of days dose missed, how often did you take PrEP in the way you were supposed to, how good a job did you do at taking PrEP. Items were transformed to a 0-100 scale and averaged. Thirty was subtracted from number of days missed and multiplied by 3.33. Responses for remaining 2 items: never/very poor=0, rarely/poor=20, sometimes/fair=40, usually/good=60, almost always/very good=80, always/excellent=100. |
| Number of Partners in the Past 6 Months | 6-10 months post baseline | Self-reported number of vaginal or anal sex partners in the past 6-months using the AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA). |
| AGYW Condom Use at Last Sex | 6-10 months post baseline | Self-reported condom use at last vaginal or anal sex using the AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA). |
| AGYW Consistency of Condom Use | 6-10 months post baseline | Self-reported consistency of condom use during vaginal and anal sex in the past 6-months using the AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA). |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop? | Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2 | Single item: How honest did you feel you could be during today's workshop? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability. |
| Intervention Fidelity | Same day the IMARA intervention was conducted | Number of IMARA intervention activities completed as planned. |
| Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities? | Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2 | Single item: How much did you feel you were involved or engaged in the activities? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability. |
| Intervention Reach | Enrollment | The number of dyads who were eligible and consented/assented to participate in the study. |
| Intervention Feasibility: Completed the First Intervention Day of IMARA | Baseline | The number of dyads in the IMARA-SA group who attend at least one IMARA-SA session |
| Intervention Feasibility: Completed the Second Intervention Day of IMARA | Baseline | The number of dyads in the IMARA-SA group who attended the second IMARA-SA session |
| Intervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today? | Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2 | Single item: How knowledgeable were your group leaders about the information presented today? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability. |
| Intervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop? | Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2 | Single item: How satisfied were you with today's workshop? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability. |
| Intervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today? | Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2 | Single item: How comfortable were you with the group leaders who worked with you today? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability. |
| Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said? | Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2 | Single item: How much did you feel the group leaders valued what you said? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability. |
Countries
South Africa
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
61 dyads were enrolled. Two dyads were withdrawn due to ineligibility. A total of 118 participants (59 dyads) were allocated to either IMARA-SA or the Health Promotion Control Arm.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm IMARA-SA (intervention group): The IMARA-SA intervention aligns with an ecological framework, emphasizing the intersection of individual, social, and structural determinants of women's sexual health and behavior. Separate FC and AGYW groups run simultaneously and cover parallel content, while joint activities enhance FC credibility as a resource for HIV/STI prevention and facilitate practice of communication skills. Interventionists use interactive and experiential activities. IMARA-SA's goals and motto emphasize strong FC-AGYW relationships, sisterhood, community empowerment, and motivation for HIV prevention, and build group cohesion. FC and AGYW sign a pact to confirm commitment to the program. At the end of Workshop Day 1, participants receive homework to complete during the week. Woven throughout IMARA-SA is the impact of mental health issues, alcohol and drug use, and violence on HIV-risk. | 58 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm Health promotion control group: The health promotion control intervention is a family-based intervention previously delivered to families in SA and translated into isiXhosa. The intervention promotes healthy living by encouraging good nutrition, exercise, and violence reduction. It will be delivered in the same format as IMARA and will be identical in length and intensity. | 60 |
| Total | 118 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Health Promotion Control Arm | IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized AGYW Age 15-17 years old | 17 Participants | 17 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Age, Customized AGYW Age 18-19 years old | 13 Participants | 12 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Age, Customized FC Age 24-29 years old | 6 Participants | 11 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Age, Customized FC Age 30-39 years old | 13 Participants | 9 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Age, Customized FC Age 40-49 years old | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Age, Customized FC Age 50 and older | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Age, Customized FC Age Missing Data | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| AGYW age at first sex | 15.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.93 | 15.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 | 15.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.01 |
| AGYW highest education achieved Higher education | 4 Participants | 0 Participants | 4 Participants |
| AGYW highest education achieved Some or all of primary school | 11 Participants | 11 Participants | 22 Participants |
| AGYW highest education achieved Some or all of secondary | 15 Participants | 18 Participants | 33 Participants |
| AGYW report of female caregiver participating Aunt | 10 Participants | 6 Participants | 16 Participants |
| AGYW report of female caregiver participating Biological mother | 12 Participants | 12 Participants | 24 Participants |
| AGYW report of female caregiver participating Cousin | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants |
| AGYW report of female caregiver participating Grandmother | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| AGYW report of female caregiver participating Other | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| AGYW report of female caregiver participating Sister | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 11 Participants |
| AGYW's Report of Adherence to PrEP | 69.1 score STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.1 | 75.0 score STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9 | 70.8 score STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.5 |
| AGYW supported self financially in past year | 7 Participants | 3 Participants | 10 Participants |
| FC highest education level acheived Higher education | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants |
| FC highest education level acheived Missing Data | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| FC highest education level acheived No schooling | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants |
| FC highest education level acheived Some or all of primary school | 12 Participants | 9 Participants | 21 Participants |
| FC highest education level acheived Some or all of secondary | 12 Participants | 13 Participants | 25 Participants |
| FC supported self financially in the past year | 24 Participants | 23 Participants | 47 Participants |
| Number of AGYW Completing HIV Testing and Counseling (HTC) | 28 Participants | 28 Participants | 56 Participants |
| Number of AGYW reporting did not use a condom at last sex | 7 Participants | 4 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Number of AGYW reporting ever had sex | 19 Participants | 20 Participants | 39 Participants |
| Number of AGYW who have had sex in past 6 months | 14 Participants | 12 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Number of AGYW who report 2 or more partners in the past 6 months | 5 Participants | 5 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Number of AGYW who report using condoms inconsistently in past 6 months | 10 Participants | 4 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Number of AGYW who report using substances during sex in past 6 months | 10 Participants | 8 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Number of AGYW who tested positive for a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) | 9 Participants | 12 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Number of AGYW who were ever prescribed PrEP | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | โ | โ | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment South Africa | 60 participants | 58 participants | 118 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 60 Participants | 58 Participants | 118 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 29 | 0 / 30 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 29 | 0 / 30 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 29 | 0 / 30 |
Outcome results
Number of AGYW Completing HIV Testing and Counseling (HTC)
Completion of HIV Testing and Counseling (HTC)
Time frame: 8-17 months post baseline
Population: Denominator is those who came to site for HTC at follow-up and were not living with HIV (39 came to site for follow-up, 2 were living with HIV and were removed).
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Number of AGYW Completing HIV Testing and Counseling (HTC) | 20 Participants |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Number of AGYW Completing HIV Testing and Counseling (HTC) | 17 Participants |
Number of AGYW Who Elected to Take Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)
Uptake of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) assessed as receipt of PrEP prescription from research team or other care provider after the baseline survey.
Time frame: 8-17 months post baseline
Population: Denominator is those who completed follow-up surveys, were not living with HIV, and did not report having been prescribed PrEP at baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Number of AGYW Who Elected to Take Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) | 17 Participants |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Number of AGYW Who Elected to Take Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) | 9 Participants |
Number of AGYW Who Tested Positive for a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI)
A positive test for at least one of two STIs: chlamydia and/or gonorrhea
Time frame: 8-17 months post baseline
Population: Data represents AGYW. Denominator is those who completed STI testing at follow-up. Excludes one participant who completed STI testing at follow-up but did not receive STI treatment at baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Number of AGYW Who Tested Positive for a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) | 4 Participants |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Number of AGYW Who Tested Positive for a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) | 6 Participants |
AGYW Condom Use at Last Sex
Self-reported condom use at last vaginal or anal sex using the AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA).
Time frame: 6-10 months post baseline
Population: Denominator includes AGYW who reported sex in the past 6 months at follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | AGYW Condom Use at Last Sex | Yes | 10 Participants |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | AGYW Condom Use at Last Sex | No | 8 Participants |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | AGYW Condom Use at Last Sex | Yes | 4 Participants |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | AGYW Condom Use at Last Sex | No | 5 Participants |
AGYW Consistency of Condom Use
Self-reported consistency of condom use during vaginal and anal sex in the past 6-months using the AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA).
Time frame: 6-10 months post baseline
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | AGYW Consistency of Condom Use | Always | 10 Participants |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | AGYW Consistency of Condom Use | Less than always | 8 Participants |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | AGYW Consistency of Condom Use | Always | 4 Participants |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | AGYW Consistency of Condom Use | Less than always | 5 Participants |
AGYW's Report of Adherence to PrEP
Adherence to PrEP is measured using an adapted version of the Wilson scale (2017). Measure Description: (0=low adherence to 100=high adherence) Scale is comprised of 3 items: number of days dose missed, how often did you take PrEP in the way you were supposed to, how good a job did you do at taking PrEP. Items were transformed to a 0-100 scale and averaged. Thirty was subtracted from number of days missed and multiplied by 3.33. Responses for remaining 2 items: never/very poor=0, rarely/poor=20, sometimes/fair=40, usually/good=60, almost always/very good=80, always/excellent=100.
Time frame: 6-10 months post baseline
Population: Denominator is those who reported being prescribed PrEP on the follow-up survey and not on the baseline survey.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | AGYW's Report of Adherence to PrEP | 60.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.5 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | AGYW's Report of Adherence to PrEP | 54.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.8 |
AGYW Substance Use During Sex in the Past 6 Months
Self-reported number of times had vaginal or anal sex while drinking or taking drugs in the past 6-months using the AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA).
Time frame: 6-10 months post baseline
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | AGYW Substance Use During Sex in the Past 6 Months | Never | 9 Participants |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | AGYW Substance Use During Sex in the Past 6 Months | 1+ time | 9 Participants |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | AGYW Substance Use During Sex in the Past 6 Months | Never | 4 Participants |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | AGYW Substance Use During Sex in the Past 6 Months | 1+ time | 5 Participants |
Number of Partners in the Past 6 Months
Self-reported number of vaginal or anal sex partners in the past 6-months using the AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA).
Time frame: 6-10 months post baseline
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Number of Partners in the Past 6 Months | 1 partner | 14 Participants |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Number of Partners in the Past 6 Months | 2+ partners | 4 Participants |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Number of Partners in the Past 6 Months | 1 partner | 8 Participants |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Number of Partners in the Past 6 Months | 2+ partners | 1 Participants |
Intervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today?
Single item: How comfortable were you with the group leaders who worked with you today? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2
Population: 29 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to IMARA-SA: 26 dyads completed Day 1 and 22 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 6 AGYW who completed Day 1 and 1 FC who completed Day 2.~30 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to Health Promotion: 28 dyads completed Day 1 and 27 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 2 AGYW and 3 FC who completed Day 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today? | AGYW Day 1 | 4.65 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today? | FC Day 1 | 4.73 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today? | AGYW Day 2 | 4.68 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today? | FC Day 2 | 4.90 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today? | FC Day 2 | 4.96 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today? | AGYW Day 1 | 4.89 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.32 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today? | AGYW Day 2 | 4.80 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Comfortable Were You With the Group Leaders Who Worked With You Today? | FC Day 1 | 4.79 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
Intervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop?
Single item: How honest did you feel you could be during today's workshop? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2
Population: 29 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to IMARA-SA: 26 dyads completed Day 1 and 22 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 6 AGYW who completed Day 1 and 1 FC who completed Day 2.~30 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to Health Promotion: 28 dyads completed Day 1 and 27 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 2 AGYW and 3 FC who completed Day 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop? | AGYW Day 2 | 4.73 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop? | FC Day 1 | 4.69 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop? | FC Day 2 | 4.86 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop? | AGYW Day 1 | 4.70 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop? | FC Day 2 | 5.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop? | FC Day 1 | 4.82 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop? | AGYW Day 2 | 4.80 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Honest Did You Feel You Could be During Today's Workshop? | AGYW Day 1 | 4.64 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
Intervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today?
Single item: How knowledgeable were your group leaders about the information presented today? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2
Population: 29 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to IMARA-SA: 26 dyads completed Day 1 and 22 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 6 AGYW who completed Day 1 and 1 FC who completed Day 2.~30 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to Health Promotion: 28 dyads completed Day 1 and 27 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 2 AGYW and 3 FC who completed Day 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today? | AGYW Day 1 | 4.90 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today? | FC Day 1 | 4.88 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today? | AGYW Day 2 | 4.73 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today? | FC Day 2 | 4.86 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today? | FC Day 2 | 4.88 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today? | AGYW Day 1 | 4.86 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today? | AGYW Day 2 | 4.80 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Knowledgeable Were Your Group Leaders About the Information Presented Today? | FC Day 1 | 4.75 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said?
Single item: How much did you feel the group leaders valued what you said? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2
Population: 29 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to IMARA-SA: 26 dyads completed Day 1 and 22 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 6 AGYW who completed Day 1 and 1 FC who completed Day 2.~30 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to Health Promotion: 28 dyads completed Day 1 and 27 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 2 AGYW and 3 FC who completed Day 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said? | AGYW Day 1 | 4.75 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said? | FC Day 1 | 4.88 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said? | AGYW Day 2 | 4.68 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said? | FC Day 2 | 4.95 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said? | FC Day 2 | 4.88 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said? | AGYW Day 1 | 4.79 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said? | AGYW Day 2 | 4.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel the Group Leaders Valued What You Said? | FC Day 1 | 4.79 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities?
Single item: How much did you feel you were involved or engaged in the activities? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2
Population: 29 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to IMARA-SA: 26 dyads completed Day 1 and 22 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 6 AGYW who completed Day 1, 1 AGYW who completed Day 2, and 1 FC who completed Day 2.~30 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to Health Promotion: 28 dyads completed Day 1 and 27 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 2 AGYW and 3 FC who completed Day 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities? | AGYW Day 1 | 4.75 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities? | FC Day 1 | 4.58 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.64 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities? | AGYW Day 2 | 4.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities? | FC Day 2 | 4.95 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities? | FC Day 2 | 4.75 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities? | AGYW Day 1 | 4.71 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities? | AGYW Day 2 | 4.72 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.54 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Much Did You Feel You Were Involved or Engaged in the Activities? | FC Day 1 | 4.68 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
Intervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop?
Single item: How satisfied were you with today's workshop? Participants responded on a 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely) scale. High scores indicate greater acceptability.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention Day 1 and Day 2
Population: 29 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to IMARA-SA: 26 dyads completed Day 1 and 22 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 6 AGYW who completed Day 1 and 1 FC who completed Day 2.~30 AGYW-FC dyads were randomized to Health Promotion: 28 dyads completed Day 1 and 27 dyads completed Day 2. Data is missing for 2 AGYW and 3 FC who completed Day 2.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop? | AGYW Day 1 | 4.95 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop? | FC Day 1 | 4.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop? | AGYW Day 2 | 4.86 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop? | FC Day 2 | 4.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop? | FC Day 2 | 5.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop? | AGYW Day 1 | 4.54 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.69 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop? | AGYW Day 2 | 4.80 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| Health Promotion Control Arm | Intervention Acceptability: How Satisfied Were You With Today's Workshop? | FC Day 1 | 4.79 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
Intervention Feasibility: Completed the First Intervention Day of IMARA
The number of dyads in the IMARA-SA group who attend at least one IMARA-SA session
Time frame: Baseline
Population: The number of dyads in the IMARA-SA group who attend at least one IMARA-SA session
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Feasibility: Completed the First Intervention Day of IMARA | 26 Participants |
Intervention Feasibility: Completed the Second Intervention Day of IMARA
The number of dyads in the IMARA-SA group who attended the second IMARA-SA session
Time frame: Baseline
Population: The number of dyads in the IMARA-SA group who attended the second IMARA-SA session
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Feasibility: Completed the Second Intervention Day of IMARA | 22 Participants |
Intervention Fidelity
Number of IMARA intervention activities completed as planned.
Time frame: Same day the IMARA intervention was conducted
Population: Proportion of IMARA intervention activities completed as planned. Fidelity was not measured for the health promotion control group. The number of units analyzed is the total number of activities in the IMARA intervention.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Fidelity | 199 Number of IMARA intervention activities |
Intervention Reach
The number of dyads who were eligible and consented/assented to participate in the study.
Time frame: Enrollment
Population: Data represents number of dyads who were eligible and enrolled.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| IMARA-SA Intervention Arm | Intervention Reach | 59 Participants |