Skip to content

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Conventional Approach: Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes.

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Conventional Approach: Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05504109
Enrollment
50
Registered
2022-08-17
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
2023-04-01
Last updated
2022-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery

Brief summary

The term minimally invasive mitral valve surgery has been reported (MIMVS) by American Heart Association and referred to a collection of new techniques. All of these new techniques aiming to reduce surgical trauma by minimizing surgical incision, modified perfusion methods and use of new instruments . The right anterior mini-thoracotomy is the most common approach, next to it the lower mini-sternotomy approach, then the parasternal incision or the left posterior thoracotomy approach . Technically MIMVS is more complex, requires a special learning curve and associated with higher Incidence of neurological events, aortic dissection, groin complications and infection despite all these benefits . MIVS also has controversies among cardiac surgeons, because it makes the exposure worse and requires a more complex surgery, which may lead to a less satisfying effect

Interventions

PROCEDUREmitral valve replacement through full sternotomy approach.

compare between Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement and Conventional Approach

PROCEDUREmitral valve replacement through right mini thoracotomy approach.

compare between Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement and Conventional Approach

Sponsors

Sohag University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with isolated rheumatic mitral valve disease in need for mitral valve replacement.

Exclusion criteria

* Redo mitral valve replacement. * Emergency mitral valve replacement (non-rheumatic cases). * Patients who have combined other valve diseases e.g. (severe Aortic Regurgitation). * Patients need Tricuspid valve repair or replacement. * Severely calcified mitral valve disease (mitral annular calcification).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
post-operative painimmediately post operativepain score
total hospital stay in daysmaximum 7 daysdays in hospital included ICU stay and ward stay

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactAbdelhamed A haridi, assistant lecture
abdelhameed.abdelrehem@med.sohag.edu.eg01000565186
Backup Contactkhaled m abdelaal, professor

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026