Skip to content

Social Support Intervention Targeting Patients Treated for Cardiac Disease Who Experience Loneliness

Feasibility Randomized Trial of a Social Support Intervention Plus Usual Care Versus Usual Care, Targeting Patients Treated for Cardiac Disease Who Experience Loneliness

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05503810
Enrollment
4
Registered
2022-08-17
Start date
2022-10-05
Completion date
2023-07-01
Last updated
2023-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Feasibility

Keywords

Loneliness, Social support, cardiac

Brief summary

Introduction: In patients treated for cardiac disease, loneliness is known to contribute negatively to health behavior, health outcome and increase risk of cardiac and all-cause mortality. Even so, in health care research, social support interventional studies targeting patients who experience loneliness is lacking. Aim: To determine the feasibility of an individually structured social support intervention targeting patients treated for cardiac disease who experience loneliness. Design: A feasibility study based on randomized clinical trial design with 1:1 randomization to a 6-month social support program, plus usual care (intervention) versus usual care, (i.e., regular guidelines-based follow-up). Intervention: Patients classified as high risk lonely according to the High Risk Loneliness tool will be provided with an informal caregiver in the six months rehabilitation phase following cardiac disease treatment. The informal caregiver will be designated by the patient from the existing social network or a peer, depending on patients' preferences. The core content of the intervention is through nurse consultations at baseline, one, three and six months, to enhance and reinforce the informal caregiver's competences to be a social support resource. The theoretical framework of the nurse consolations will be based on Middle-range theory of self-care. Outcome: Feasibility will be evaluated in terms of acceptability and adherence according to predefined feasibility criteria. The preliminary effect of the intervention on patient-reported outcomes, health behaviors and health outcomes will be evaluated in the intervention and the control group at baseline, one, three, six and twelve months.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSocial support

Contact ones a week with Informal caregiver or peer support

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized clinical trial design with 1:1 randomization

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients treated for Ischemic heart disease (CABG or PCI), valve disease (TAVR, SAVR), and arrhythmia (ICD, pacemaker implantation or ablation) treated at Rigshospitalet and classified as high risk lonely according to the High Risk Loneliness (HiRL) tool

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are unable to provide written consent, therefore, patients with severe cognitive or physical dysfunction will not be approached

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility, AcceptabilityMeasured at baselinePercentage of eligible patients who agree to participate in the trial
Feasibility, Adherence6 months follow-up after in-hospital cardiac treatmentPercentage of patients in contact with the informal caregiver at least once a week face to face, by phone or virtually.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measure of social network members as informal caregiversMeasured at baselinePercentage of potential caregivers who accepts to be an informal caregiver
Measure of informal caregivers3 months follow-up after in-hospital cardiac treatmentPercentage of informal caregivers participating in all three intervention consultations with the trial staff
Resource consumption6 months follow-up after in-hospital cardiac treatmentTime resources used to complete the three nurse consultations

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-careBaseline, one, three, six and twelve monthsSelf Care Self-Efficacy scale. 10 item scale answered on a Likert scale 1 to 5 with a lower score indicating worse outcome
Health-related quality of lifeBaseline, one, three, six and twelve monthsHeartQoL. 10 item scale answered on a Likert scale 0-5, with a higher score indicating worse outcome
LonelinessBaseline, one, three, six and twelve monthsHigh Risk Loneliness tool. 2 item. Screeningscore 0 to 2, with a higher score indicating worse outcome
Anxiety and DepressionBaseline, one, three, six and twelve monthsHospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS). 14 item scale. The scale offers two scores, HADS-A (anxiety) and HADS-D (depression). Answered in a Likert scale with a higher score indicating worse outcome
Health behaviorsBaseline, one, three, six and twelve monthsSmoking, alcohol consumption, weight, physical activity, participation in cardiac rehabilitation

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026