Skip to content

Chicken Model in Teaching Episiotomy Repair

The Effect of Chicken Model in Teaching Episiotomy Repair on Satisfaction, Self-Confidence, and Anxiety Levels of Midwifery Students

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05502640
Enrollment
80
Registered
2022-08-16
Start date
2022-09-15
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2023-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Episiotomy Wound

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of chicken use in episiotomy repair training of midwifery students on students' satisfaction, self-confidence and anxiety levels. Hypotheses H01 There is no difference between the satisfaction score of the chicken group and the satisfaction score of the control group in episiotomy repair training. H02 In episiotomy repair training, there is no difference between the self-confidence score of the chicken group and the self-confidence score of the control group. H03 There is no difference between the anxiety score of the chicken group and the anxiety score of the control group in episiotomy repair training.

Interventions

OTHEREducation model

Chicken legs will be used for each student in the study. Intermittent and continuous suture techniques will be studied on the incision made on the chicken leg.

OTHERRoutine Education model

In the study, 15 cm x 20 cm sponge will be used for each student. Intermittent and continuous suture techniques will be practiced on the sponge.

Sponsors

Ankara University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Midwifery students who were registered in the midwifery department in the 2020-2021 academic year and take childbearing course, * Students over the age of 18

Exclusion criteria

* Having previously received training on episiotomy and its repair, * Students who fill in the data collection forms incompletely will not be included in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)immediately before the training, immediately after the training and immediately after the clinical practice.The inventory was developed by Spielberger et al. in 1970. An adaptation, validity, and reliability study of the State-Trait Anxiety Scale in Turkish was conducted by Oner and Le Compte in 1983. The scale consists of two subdimensions: the state anxiety has 20 items and is used to determine what is felt at a specific moment under certain conditions, and the trait anxiety has 20 items and is used to determine what has been felt in the last 7 days. High scores from each subscale indicate a high level of anxiety. STAI-S consist of 20 items with four points Likert scales, each (not at all, somewhat, moderately so, very much so). Scores thus range between 20, indicating a low level of anxiety and 80, indicating a high level.
Change in satisfactionimmediately before the training, immediately after the training and immediately after the clinical practice.Visual Analog Scale is a 10-cm-long measurement tool. The left end of the scale reads I am not satisfied at all and the right end reads very satisfied. A high score on the scale indicated a high level of satisfaction and a score of 0 pointed to no satisfaction.
Self-Sufficiencyimmediately before the training, immediately after the training and immediately after the clinical practice.Visual Analog Scale (VAS)- assessed by adequate vision. For each item, students rated their sense of self-sufficiency on a scale of 0 (very inadequate) to 10 (very adequate).
The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scaleimmediately after trainingThis instrument is a 13-item scale used to measure student satisfaction with the simulation activity (5 items) and self-confidence in learning (8 items). Responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale with values ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction and greater levels of self confidence.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026