Skip to content

Study to Compare Bictegravir/Lenacapavir Versus Current Therapy in People With HIV-1 Who Are Successfully Treated With a Complicated Regimen (ARTISTRY-1)

An Operationally Seamless Phase 2/3 Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Bictegravir/Lenacapavir Versus Stable Baseline Regimen in Virologically Suppressed People With HIV-1 on Stable Complex Treatment Regimens

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05502341
Acronym
ARTISTRY-1
Enrollment
689
Registered
2022-08-16
Start date
2022-08-16
Completion date
2029-12-01
Last updated
2026-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV-1-infection

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical study is to learn more about the effects of switching to the study drugs, bictegravir (BIC) plus lenacapavir (LEN), versus current therapy (Phase 2) and BIC/LEN fixed-dose combination (FDC) versus current therapy (Phase 3) in people living with HIV (PWH).

Interventions

Tablets administered orally without regard to food

Tablets administered orally without regard to food

DRUGBIC/LEN FDC

Tablets administered orally without regard to food

DRUGStable Baseline Regimen

SBR will include a combination of antiretroviral (ARV) regimen. ARV regimen may include the following, except for participants taking a single tablet regimen or taking a complete parenteral regimen (Cabenuva). * Nucleos(t)ide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors: * Abacavir * Emtricitabine * Lamivudine * Tenofovir alafenamide * Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate * Zidovudine * Non-Nucleosite Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors: * Delavirdine * Efavirenz * Nevirapine * Rilpivirine * Doravirine * Integrase Inhibitors: * Bictegravir * Cabotegravir * Dolutegravir * Elvitegravir * Raltegravir * Protease Inhibitors: * Atazanavir * Darunavir * Fosamprenavir * Indinavir * Lopinavir * Nelfinavir * Saquinavir * Tipranavir * Chemokine Co-receptor 5 (CCR5) Antagonist: * Maraviroc * Fusion Inhibitors: * Enfuvirtide * gp120 Attachment Inhibitor: * Fostemsavir * Anti-CD4 Monoclonal Antibodies: * Ibalizumab-uiyk

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * If plasma HIV-1 RNA measurements in the 6 months prior to screening are available, all levels must be \< 50 copies/mL. * At least one documented plasma HIV-1 RNA level measured between 6 and 12 months (± 2 months) prior to screening. This and any other HIV-1 RNA measurements documented in this period must be \< 50 copies/mL * Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels \< 50 copies/mL at screening. * Currently receiving a complex antiretroviral (ARV) regimen due to previous viral resistance, or intolerance, or contraindication to existing single-tablet regimens (STR), and on this regimen for at least 6 months prior to the screening visit. The criteria to define a complex regimen in this study are as follows: * A regimen containing a boosted protease inhibitor or a nonnucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) plus at least 1 other third agent (ie, an agent from a class other than NRTIs) (eg, bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (coformulated; Biktarvy®)(BVY) + darunavir/cobicistat, BVY + etravirine), or * A regimen of ≥ 2 pills/day, or a regimen requiring dosing more than once daily, or * A regimen containing parenteral agent(s) (excluding a complete long-acting injectable regimen, such as intramuscular cabotegravir plus rilpivirine) as well as oral agents. * No documented or suspected resistance to bictegravir (BIC). * Estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 15 mL/min according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula for creatinine clearance (CLcr) who are not on renal replacement therapy. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Prior use of, or exposure to, lenacapavir (LEN) * Active tuberculosis infection * Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Ribonucleic Acid (HIV-1 RNA) ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 24 as Determined by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) Defined Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 24Participants who had the last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA≥ 50 copies/mL in the week 24 analysis window, or who did not have on-treatment HIV-1 RNA data in the week 24 analysis window and participants who discontinued study drug prior to or in the week 24 analysis window due to lack of efficacy, or who discontinued study drug prior to or in the week 24 analysis window due to adverse event (AE) or death and have the last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA≥ 50 copies/mL, or who discontinued study drug prior to or in the week 24 analysis window due to reasons other than AE, death, or lack of efficacy and have the last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL were included. The Week 24 window for snapshot algorithm was between Days 127 and 210 (inclusively). Percentages were rounded off.
Phase 3: Percentages of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 48Participants who had the last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL in the Week 48 analysis window, or who did not have on-treatment HIV-1 RNA data in the Week 48 analysis window and who discontinued study drug prior to or in the Week 48 analysis window due to lack of efficacy, or who discontinued study drug prior to or in the Week 48 analysis window due to AE or death and have the last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL, or who discontinued study drug prior to or in the Week 48 analysis window due to reasons other than AE, death, or lack of efficacy and have the last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL were included. The Week 48 window for snapshot algorithm was between Days 295 and 378 (inclusively). Percentages were rounded off.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 24 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 24Participants who had the last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL in the Week 24 analysis window were included. The Week 24 window for snapshot algorithm was between Days 127 and 210 (inclusively). Percentages were rounded off.
Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Clusters of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Cell Count at Week 24Baseline, Week 24—
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Through Week 24First dose date up to Week 24An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a study drug that did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as any AE that begins on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the date of last dose of study drug plus 60 days (for BIC+LEN or BIC/LEN FDC) or 30 days (for SBR) or any AE leading to study drug discontinuation. Percentages were rounded off.
Phase 2: PK Parameter: Cmax for Bictegravir (BIC) at Steady StateAt Week 16 or 24Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug. Participants chose to participate at either Week 16 or Week 24 visit as the steady state visit.
Phase 2: PK Parameter: Cmax for Lenacapavir (LEN) at Steady StateAt Week 16 or Week 24Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug. Participants chose to participate at either Week 16 or Week 24 visit as the steady state visit.
Phase 2: PK Parameter: AUCtau of BIC at Steady StateAt Week 16 or 24AUCtau is defined as the area under the concentration versus time curve over the dosing interval. Participants chose to participate at either Week 16 or Week 24 visit as the steady state visit.
Phase 2: PK Parameter: AUCtau for LEN at Steady StateAt Week 16 or Week 24AUCtau is defined as the area under the concentration versus time curve over the dosing interval. Participants chose to participate at either Week 16 or Week 24 visit as the steady state visit.
Phase 2: PK Parameter: Ctrough of BIC at Steady StateAt Week 16 or Week 24Ctrough is defined as the observed drug concentration at the end of the dosing interval. Participants chose to participate at either Week 16 or Week 24 visit as the steady state visit.
Phase 2: PK Parameter: Ctrough of LEN at Steady StateAt Week 16 or Week 24Ctrough is defined as the observed drug concentration at the end of the dosing interval. Participants chose to participate at either Week 16 or Week 24 visit as the steady state visit.
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 48Participants who had the last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL in the Week 48 analysis window were included. The Week 48 window for snapshot algorithm was between Days 295 and 378 (inclusively).
Phase 3: Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 48Baseline, Week 48An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a study drug that did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as any AE that begins on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the date of last dose of study drug plus 60 days (for BIC+LEN or BIC/LEN FDC) or 30 days (for SBR) or any AE leading to study drug discontinuation. Percentages were rounded off.
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Experiencing TEAEs Through Week 48First dose date up to Week 48An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a study drug that did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as 1 or both of the following: Any AEs leading to premature discontinuation of study drug, or any AEs with an onset date on or after the study drug start date and no later than the last exposure date after permanent discontinuation of the study drug. Percentages were rounded off.
Phase 3 Treatment Group 1: (BIC/LEN 75 mg/50 mg FDC): Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 96 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 96—
Phase 3 Treatment Group 1: (BIC/LEN 75 mg/50 mg FDC): Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 144 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 144—
Phase 3 Treatment Group 1: (BIC/LEN 75 mg/50 mg FDC): Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 96—
Phase 3 Treatment Group 1: (BIC/LEN 75 mg/50 mg FDC): Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 144 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 144—
Phase 3 Treatment Group 1: (BIC/LEN 75 mg/50 mg FDC): Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 96Baseline, Week 96—
Phase 3 Treatment Group 1: (BIC/LEN 75 mg/50 mg FDC): Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 144Baseline, Week 144—
Phase 3 Treatment Group 1: (BIC/LEN 75 mg/50 mg FDC): Percentage of Participants Experiencing TEAEs Through Week 96Week 96—
Phase 3 Treatment Group 1: (BIC/LEN 75 mg/50 mg FDC): Percentage of Participants Experiencing TEAEs Through Week 144Week 144—

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Canada, Dominican Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Puerto Rico, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at study sites in South America, Oceania, North America, Europe, Asia and Africa.

Pre-assignment details

Overall, 891 participants were screened: 162 in Phase 2 and 729 in Phase 3. Data submitted represents primary analysis performed on data collected by the Primary Completion Date. Complete data will be submitted within 1 year from the Study Completion date.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic—
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
211 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
474 Participants
Age, Continuous60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
18 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Collected
39 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other or More Than One Race
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
124 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
81 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Dominican Republic
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
34 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
47 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
39 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
134 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
45 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 511 / 520 / 255 / 3730 / 188
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 5113 / 525 / 25141 / 37170 / 186
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 512 / 522 / 2552 / 37122 / 186

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Oct 22, 2026