Skip to content

A Comparison Between Ketamine-lidocaine Versus Ketamine-fentanyl for Induction on the Hemodynamic Effects in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

A Comparison Between Ketamine-lidocaine Versus Ketamine-fentanyl for Induction on the Hemodynamic Effects in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction :( A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05502211
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-08-16
Start date
2022-11-01
Completion date
2022-12-01
Last updated
2022-10-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Induction of General Anesthesia

Brief summary

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) presenting for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) represent a high-risk group among the cardiac surgical population. Anesthetic management of these patients is challenging due to increased risk of perioperative hypotension and subsequently increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Post induction hypotension is a modifiable risk that can be largely prevented by adjusting the technique for anesthesia induction. There is no consensus on the use of certain anesthetic induction techniques for patients CAD and left ventricular dysfunction. Anesthesia induction techniques for cardiovascular surgery are usually based on considerations such as hemodynamic stability, effects on myocardial oxygen supply, and demand and minimizing intubation stress response.To the best of our knowledge, there is no previous data comparing the efficacy of adding lidocaine versus fentanyl to the induction of anesthesia with ketamine in patients with poor ventricular function.

Interventions

DRUGFentanyl

induction of anaesthesia using fentanyl

DRUGLidocaine IV

induction of anesthesia using lidocaine

Sponsors

Kasr El Aini Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants will be patients with coronary artery disease and moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction \< 40%), ASA physical status II-IV that will be scheduled for elective CABG surgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with associated valvular heart disease, persistent arrhythmias, congestive cardiac failure, on mechanical ventilation, intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), emergency surgery, and those with known allergy to any of the study's drugs, severe systemic non-cardiac disease; will be excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
incidence of hypotension15 minutes post inductinthe number of patients who will develop hypotension

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactAyman Abougabal, MD
ayman.abougabal@kasralainy.edu.eg01020671408
Backup ContactMonica Nashaat
01229694414

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026