HIV
Conditions
Brief summary
Specific Aim 1. Conduct 18 focus groups among Black gay, bisexual and other sexual minority men (SMM; n=72-90) in the Washington, DC area of different age groups (18-24, 25-34, 35+) and various pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use profiles (i.e., PrEP naïve, current PrEP users, and discontinued PrEP; two per age-group and PrEP use profile) to understand intervention feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness, how the intervention can address experienced and perceived socio-structural barriers, and increase PrEP initiation and adherence among Black SMM in the Washington, District of Columbia (DC) area. Specific Aim 2. Implement an iterative open-phase pilot of an SNS intervention to increase PrEP initiation among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative Black SMM, aged 18 years and above, in the Washington, DC area. Recruit 30 PrEP-using Black SMM, including those who use substances, as Recruiters to identify and refer Network Associates to PrEP services. The pilot will occur in six blocks of up to 5 Recruiters to further develop all intervention procedures and enhance the social networking strategy (SNS) intervention's feasibility and acceptability.
Detailed description
The first 12 months (Phase 1: Formative Research) will be an intervention development/adaptation phase. Using a community-based participatory approach (n=18 age- and PrEP use profile-specific focus groups, of at least 4-5 participants each, totaling 72-90), participants will be asked about the social network dynamics and characteristics (e.g., influential network members, communication about PrEP as an HIV prevention method) that influenced their decision to initiate PrEP. Among participants with no PrEP use, they will be asked about the acceptability and feasibility of talking with PrEP-using Black SMM within their respective social network to support initiation along with preferences for relevant PrEP-related information from peers. The following 12 months (Phase 2: Open-phase Pilot Study) will involve conducting an open pilot of the SNS intervention, in up to six batches of up to 5 participants (n=30), allowing for further intervention refinement. This will allow us to demonstrate participant feasibility and acceptance, which includes the ability to recruit network members, feasibility of intervention delivery, and changes in participant behaviors. It will allow for further evaluation of the feasibility of all study procedures, and refinement of intervention manual. Therefore, the expected outcome is a culturally relevant SNS intervention to increase PrEP initiation among Black SMM through PrEP-using social network members.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALSocial Networking Strategies
Assess whether PrEP-using Black SMM can serve as an Interventionist to get their social and sexual network members to uptake and adhere to PrEP
Sponsors
Us Helping Us, People Into Living, Inc.
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Recruit 30 PrEP-using Black SMM, including those who use substances, as Recruiters to identify and refer Network Associates to PrEP services. The pilot will occur in six blocks of up to 5 Recruiters to further develop all intervention procedures and enhance the SNS intervention's feasibility and acceptability.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Age of 18 years or above * Black or African American race * Cisgender male identity * Gay, bisexual or a male who has sex with other males * Residence in the greater Washington, DC area (includes District of Columbia, Prince George's County, MD and Montgomery County, MD) * Current PrEP use * Confirmed HIV-negative status.
Exclusion criteria
* Being younger than 18 years of age ; * Cisgender or transgender female identity * Males having sex with women exclusively * Being unable to speak or read English * Reside outside of the defined greater Washington, DC area * Being unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent * Being unable to comply with the requirements of the protocol (e.g. persons with mental health conditions, persons who are intoxicated or incoherent for other reasons) * Being a member of other vulnerable populations: pregnant women, children or wards of the state.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of Intervention as measured by Weiner et al., 2017. | During the peer-based debriefing sessions that occurs before a Recruiter is dismissed from the open-phase pilot. | Assess the feasibility of intervention delivery method (i.e., PrEP-using SMM as the Interventionist/Recruiter). |
| Acceptability of Intervention as measured by Weiner et al., 2017. | During the peer-based debriefing sessions that occurs before a Recruiter is dismissed from the open-phase pilot. | Assess the feasibility of intervention delivery method (i.e., PrEP-using SMM as the Interventionist/Recruiter). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Recruited Network Members | Immediately after PrEP-using SMM enroll as an Interventionist (i.e., Recruiter) | Proportion of Recruiters who recruit Network Associates |
| Network members on PrEP | Immediately after PrEP-using SMM enroll as an Interventionist (i.e., Recruiter) | Number of Network Associates recruited |
| Comfortability of the Intervention as measured by an adaptation of Weiner et al., 2017. | During the peer-based debriefing sessions that occurs before a Recruiter is dismissed from the open-phase pilot. | Extent to which Network Associates were comfortable with the intervention modality |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Primary ContactDeMarc A Hickson, PhD
Backup ContactAdedotun Ogunbajo, PhD
Outcome results
None listed