Skip to content

Usability of Levodopa Cyclops™ vs INBRIJA® in Parkinson's Patients

Usability of Levodopa Cyclops™ Compared to INBRIJA® During an Off Episode in Parkinson's Disease Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05499572
Acronym
DPI-6
Enrollment
16
Registered
2022-08-12
Start date
2024-02-29
Completion date
2024-07-02
Last updated
2024-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Usability

Keywords

Parkinson

Brief summary

Currently there is one Levodopa inhaler on the market, the INBRIJA® inhaler. When looking at the user instructions for the INBRIJA®, multiple steps are necessary including preparing and cleaning the inhaler. The Levodopa Cyclops™ inhaler also requires steps to be ready-for-use, however there are less steps required to reach this 'ready-for-use' state. This is mainly because the medicine (Levodopa) is already prefilled in the inhaler. Moreover, the Levodopa Cyclops™ is a single-use inhaler and cleaning steps are not necessary. Since both inhalers should be used during off episodes, there might be a preference for one inhaler over the other due to the instructions. An off episode might impair the ability and length to successfully operate an inhaler due to mental or mobility issues. This study investigates if Parkinson patients have a preference for one of the inhalers based on handling steps, ease-of-use, understandability.

Detailed description

Sixteen Parkinson's patients, who are ≥ 18 years of age, regularly suffering from predictable off episodes, able to understand the inhaler user instructions (no cognitive dysfunction) and who did not previously participate in the Parkinson DPI-1,2,3,4 or 5 study or in a study using INBRIJA®.

Interventions

DEVICEInhalation maneuver with placebo Inbrija and placebo Cyclops

Patients perform the inhalation maneuvers with placebo inhalers (Inbrija and Cyclops) during a Parkinson's off episode.

Sponsors

Martini Hospital Groningen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with Parkinson's disease by a neurologist; * At least 18 years of age; * Regularly suffering from predictable off episodes despite medication; * Recognizable off episodes for themselves and others; * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Not able to understand an inhalation instruction of either the Levodopa Cyclops™ or the INBRIJA® (within a maximum of 20 minutes of explanation per inhaler); * Cognitive dysfunction, which precludes good understanding of instructions and/or informed consent; * Previously participated in the Parkinson DPI-1, DPI-2, DPI-3, DPI-4 or DPI-5 study (prior knowledge of the inhalation maneuver of the Levodopa Cyclops™) * Having experience with using the INBRIJA® inhaler.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correct performance of inhalation maneuvers15 minutes for performing the inhalation maneuvers with both the placebo inhalers (Inbrija and Cyclops) during a Parkinson's off episodeThe main study parameter is to investigate whether Parkinson's patients perform the correct steps in accordance with the instruction card of respectively the Levodopa Cyclops™ or INBRIJA® inhaler after the primary inhalation instructions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inhaler preference of Parkinson patients10 minutes for filling in the questionnaire during or directly after a Parkinson's off episodeThe secondary study parameter is to investigate whether the Parkinson's patients prefer the Levodopa Cyclops™ or the INBRIJA® inhaler by keeping track of the total handling time and by letting the patients fill in a questionnaire keeping track of their experiences regarding the ease-of-use, convenience and preference of the different steps of the inhaler user maneuver

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026