Skip to content

Conventional Low Flow Oxygenation Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula in Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Conventional Low Flow Oxygenation Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula in Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05497986
Enrollment
84
Registered
2022-08-11
Start date
2022-10-31
Completion date
2024-07-31
Last updated
2022-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Copd Exacerbation, Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Keywords

High Flow Nasal Cannula, High Flow Nasal Insufflation, High Flow Oxygen Therapy, High Flow Oxygenation

Brief summary

Current evidence suggests a mechanistic and physiological rationale for the use of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in acute respiratory hypoxemic failure (AHRF) based on physiological studies in airway models, healthy volunteers and patients with Chronic Obstructive Respiratory Disease (COPD). This is supported by observational studies in patients with AHRF with reductions in a range of respiratory and other physiological parameters. Observational studies also suggest similar intubation rates and lower failure rates with HFNC when compared to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with improved patient acceptance and tolerance for HFNC. The role of HFNC is less clear in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Although non-invasive ventilation is the recommended treatment, it is associated with discomfort, and a significant proportion (up to 25% in some reports) cannot tolerate non-invasive ventilation. Observational reports and limited data from randomized controlled trials suggests that HFNC is effective in treating patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure. We designed this trial to assess whether early application of HFNC in patients with non-severe hypercapnic respiratory failure can correct barometric abnormalities, and prevent progression to non-invasive ventilation or tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.

Interventions

DEVICEHigh flow nasal cannula

HFNC with the maximum tolerated flow (up to 60 L/min). Titration of supplemental oxygen to a SpO2 between 88 - 92%.

DEVICEConventional low flow oxygenation

Conventional oxygenation through nasal prongs or a facemask, with supplemental oxygen titrated to a SpO2 between 88 - 92%.

Sponsors

Hôpital de Verdun
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Due to the nature of the intervention, nor the participants, nor the treating physicians, nor the investigator can be blinded. However, the outcomes will be analyzed an independent statistician blinded to the treatment assignments.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients \> 18 years of age * Acute Hypercapnic respiratory failure with pH \< 7.35 and pCO2 \> 45 mmHg

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or Breast-Feeding * Patients who cannot read and understand French or English * Hypercapnia secondary to a drug toxicity or non-pulmonary aetiology * Hypercapnia secondary to exacerbation of asthma * Contraindication to NIV * Contraindication to HFNC * Not for escalation to NIV based on a ceiling of care * pH \< 7.15 * GCS 8 or less * Shock defined as systolic \< 90 mmHg or a reduction by 20mmHg from usual systolic BP despite volume resuscitation * Respiratory or cardio-respiratory arrest * Any other indication that requires immediate invasive/non-invasive mechanical ventilation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients progressing to NIV in each cohort6 hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Venous blood gas pH1 hour, 6 hours, and 24 hours
Respiratory rate1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and daily until study completionNumber of breaths per minute, as documented in the medical chart
Heart rate1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and daily until study completionNumber of heart beats per minute, as documented in the medical chart
Mean arterial pressure1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and daily until study completionMean arterial pressure, as documented in the medical chart
Incidence of intubationUp to 90 days after enrolment, or until hospital discharge
Venous blood gas PCO21 hour, 6 hours, and 24 hours
In-hospital mortalityUp to 90 days after enrolment, or until hospital discharge
Intensive care unit length of stayUp to 90 days after enrolment, or until discharge from the intensive care unit
Hospital length of stayUp to 90 days after enrolment, or until hospital discharge
Patient comfort1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and daily until cessation of oxygen therapy, up to a maximum of 7 daysLevel of comfort assessed on a visual analogue scale by the patient
Shortness of breath1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and daily until cessation of oxygen therapy, up to a maximum of 7 daysSeverity of the shortness of breath assessed on a visual analogue scale by the patient
Admission to the intensive care unitUp to 90 days after enrolment, or until hospital discharge

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactIvan Pavlov, M.D
ivan.pavlov.md@gmail.com514-362-1000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026