Skip to content

Pilot Comparing ctDNA IDV vs. SPV Sample in Pts Undergoing Biopsies for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancers

Pilot Trial Comparing Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) From Immediate Draining Vein vs. Standard Peripheral Vein Sample in Patients Undergoing Biopsies for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancers

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05497531
Enrollment
15
Registered
2022-08-11
Start date
2022-09-07
Completion date
2027-06-01
Last updated
2026-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ampullary Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma, Hepatobiliary Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Carcinoma

Keywords

ctDNA, Circulating Tumor DNA, Pancreatic Cancer, Hepatobiliary Cancer

Brief summary

This is a prospective pilot protocol investigating whether ctDNA detection be improved by sampling the cancer draining vein versus the standard practice of sampling from a peripheral vein in patients who are undergoing biopsies for hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers.

Detailed description

This is a, prospective single center pilot study to investigate whether ctDNA detection can be improved by sampling the cancer draining vein vs. a peripheral vein (current practice). As a secondary endpoint, both ctDNA results will be compared with percutaneous biopsy (standard of care).

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTctDNA Blood Collection

Blood collection to be obtained from peripheral vein and cancer draining vein during biopsy

Sponsors

University of California, Irvine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older * Have or are undergoing work-up for hepatobiliary and/or pancreatic carcinoma (such as hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, ampullary carcinoma, pancreatic carcinoma) * Scheduled for an image-guided percutaneous or trans-jugular biopsy of a lesion * Must be able to provide a written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients unable to hold reasonably still on a procedure table or hold their breath during imaging or needle passes * Patients with a gross body weight over 375 pounds (upper limit of the CT and angiography tables) * Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy * Platelet count \< 30,000/ul * International Normalized (INR) \> 1.5 * Patients with moderate to severe ascites who cannot undergo trans-jugular biopsy or sufficient drainage * No clear reachable target for percutaneous or trans-jugular biopsy * Patient who cannot have a peripheral blood draw for ctDNA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of the amount of ctDNA in draining vein plasma sample to peripheral vein sample through ratio of mean allele frequencyUp to 1 yearRatio of mean allele frequency (MAF)% of hepatic or portal draining vein, and MAF% of peripheral blood will be utilized to compare the samples

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of unique alterations found in hepatic or portal vein plasma compared to number of alterations found in peripheral vein plasmaUp to 1 yearctDNA results will be compared with percutaneous biopsy (standard of care)
Number of unique alterations found in ctDNA compared to number of alterations derived next generation sequencing (NGS)Up to 1 yearctDNA results will be compared with percutaneous biopsy (standard of care)

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTChao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center University of California, Irvine
ucstudy@uci.edu1-877-827-7883
CONTACTUniversity of California Irvine Medical
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNadine Abi-Jaoudeh, MD

Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 1, 2026