Skip to content

Non-invasive Brain Stimulation as a Treatment for Dysarthria Post-stroke

A Randomized Controlled Trial Study of the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Treating Dysarthria Post-stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05497362
Enrollment
9
Registered
2022-08-11
Start date
2016-04-01
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2022-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysarthria, Stroke

Brief summary

The proposed study aimed to determine if tDCS can help post-stroke patients with dysarthria.

Detailed description

A total of 9 Cantonese-speaking chronic post-stroke patients who are suffering from dysarthria was recruited and randomly divided into treatment group and sham group. For the treatment group, an anodal high-definition tDCS of 2 milliampere (mA) lasting for 15 minutes was delivered to the primary motor cortex (SM1) in 10 daily sessions during a 2-week period. For the sham tDCS group, the same setting of tDCS electrodes was applied on the scalp, but the stimulation only lasted for 30 sec in order to cause similar sensation on the scalp as the other group. Simultaneous to the tDCS stimulation, both groups will receive speech and voice therapy for 30 minutes. An array of outcome measures reflecting speech production ability including acoustic, kinematic, perceptual and self-perceptual qualities was obtained before and after stimulation. It was anticipated that post-stroke dysarthric patients will see improvement in speech production after stimulation. The results provided important insights into the effects of tDCS on articulatory movement in individuals with dysarthria post-stroke.

Interventions

DEVICEReal tDCS

2mA of tDCS was delivered to the orofacial area of the primary motor cortex (SM1) for 15 minutes. Speech therapy was delivered simultaneously.

DEVICESham tDCS

2mA of tDCS was delivered to the orofacial area of the primary motor cortex (SM1) for 30 sec. Speech therapy was delivered simultaneously.

Sponsors

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
CollaboratorOTHER
The University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Double-blinded

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Cantonese-speaking adults * At least 6 months after their initial stroke * Dysarthria post-stroke

Exclusion criteria

* A personal or family history of epilepsy or seizures * A history of another neurological condition * Speech disorders * Voice disorders * Oro-maxillo-facial surgery involving the tongue and/or lip * Severe cognitive impairment * Severe aphasia * Heart disease * Metallic foreign body implant * On medications that lower neural thresholds (e.g. tricyclines, antidepressants, neuroleptic agents, etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acoustic measurement: Harmonic to noise ratio (HNR)Change before and after tDCS stimulation at immediately post-treatmentHarmonic to noise ratio (HNR) was obtained from sustained vowel phonation.
Perceptual speech assessmentsChange before and after tDCS stimulation at immediately post-treatmentAll participants were required to produce a sustained vowel /a/, repeated some syllables (i.e., /pa/, /ta/, /ka/ and /pataka/), produce some single words, read a standard paragraph in Cantonese and had a two-minute conversation with the investigator. A professional grade microphone (SM58, Shure, USA) was used to record the speech production. Experienced speech-language pathologists blinded to the neurological condition and history of each participant analyzed the speech samples independently using a perceptual rating scale including 21 speech dimensions covering eight categories, including pitch, loudness, voice quality, resonance, rate, articulation, tone, and general impression. The speech samples were rated using a seven-point equal-appearing interval scale, with a 1 indicating within typical limit performance and a 7 severely deviated from the normal.
Acoustic measurement: Fundamental frequency (F0)Change before and after tDCS stimulation at immediately post-treatmentFundamental frequency (F0) was obtained from sustained vowel phonation.
Acoustic measurement: Frequency perturbation (jitter %)Change before and after tDCS stimulation at immediately post-treatmentFrequency perturbation (jitter %) was obtained from sustained vowel phonation.
Acoustic measurement: Intensity perturbation (shimmer %)Change before and after tDCS stimulation at immediately post-treatmentIntensity perturbation (shimmer %) was obtained from sustained vowel phonation.
Acoustic measurement: Noise to harmonic ratio (NHR)Change before and after tDCS stimulation at immediately post-treatmentNoise to harmonic ratio (NHR) was obtained from sustained vowel phonation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kinematic measurement: DistanceChange before and after tDCS stimulation at immediately post-treatmentThe lip and tongue function during speech production were traced real time and objectively measured using an electromagnetic articulography. All participants were required to produce single-syllable real words of consonant-vowel (CV) construction at high level tone embedded in a carrier phrase and repeat some syllables (i.e., /pa/, /ta/, /ka/ and /pataka/). A custom-written analysis programme was used to annotate and calculate the kinematic measures, including duration (ms), distance (mm), maximum velocity (mm/s), maximum acceleration (m/s2) and maximum deceleration (m/s2) in the approach (movement towards the upper lip/palate) and release (movement away from the upper lip/palate) phases along the z-axis, i.e., along the mid-sagittal plane.
Kinematic measurement: Maximum velocityChange before and after tDCS stimulation at immediately post-treatmentThe lip and tongue function during speech production were traced real time and objectively measured using an electromagnetic articulography. All participants were required to produce single-syllable real words of consonant-vowel (CV) construction at high level tone embedded in a carrier phrase and repeat some syllables (i.e., /pa/, /ta/, /ka/ and /pataka/). A custom-written analysis programme was used to annotate and calculate the kinematic measures, including duration (ms), distance (mm), maximum velocity (mm/s), maximum acceleration (m/s2) and maximum deceleration (m/s2) in the approach (movement towards the upper lip/palate) and release (movement away from the upper lip/palate) phases along the z-axis, i.e., along the mid-sagittal plane.
Kinematic measurement: Maximum accelerationChange before and after tDCS stimulation at immediately post-treatmentThe lip and tongue function during speech production were traced real time and objectively measured using an electromagnetic articulography. All participants were required to produce single-syllable real words of consonant-vowel (CV) construction at high level tone embedded in a carrier phrase and repeat some syllables (i.e., /pa/, /ta/, /ka/ and /pataka/). A custom-written analysis programme was used to annotate and calculate the kinematic measures, including duration (ms), distance (mm), maximum velocity (mm/s), maximum acceleration (m/s2) and maximum deceleration (m/s2) in the approach (movement towards the upper lip/palate) and release (movement away from the upper lip/palate) phases along the z-axis, i.e., along the mid-sagittal plane.
Kinematic measurement: Maximum decelerationChange before and after tDCS stimulation at immediately post-treatmentThe lip and tongue function during speech production were traced real time and objectively measured using an electromagnetic articulography. All participants were required to produce single-syllable real words of consonant-vowel (CV) construction at high level tone embedded in a carrier phrase and repeat some syllables (i.e., /pa/, /ta/, /ka/ and /pataka/). A custom-written analysis programme was used to annotate and calculate the kinematic measures, including duration (ms), distance (mm), maximum velocity (mm/s), maximum acceleration (m/s2) and maximum deceleration (m/s2) in the approach (movement towards the upper lip/palate) and release (movement away from the upper lip/palate) phases along the z-axis, i.e., along the mid-sagittal plane.
Kinematic measurement: DurationChange before and after tDCS stimulation at immediately post-treatmentThe lip and tongue function during speech production were traced real time and objectively measured using an electromagnetic articulography. All participants were required to produce single-syllable real words of consonant-vowel (CV) construction at high level tone embedded in a carrier phrase and repeat some syllables (i.e., /pa/, /ta/, /ka/ and /pataka/). A custom-written analysis programme was used to annotate and calculate the kinematic measures, including duration (ms), distance (mm), maximum velocity (mm/s), maximum acceleration (m/s2) and maximum deceleration (m/s2) in the approach (movement towards the upper lip/palate) and release (movement away from the upper lip/palate) phases along the z-axis, i.e., along the mid-sagittal plane.

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026