Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal
Conditions
Keywords
Deglutition
Brief summary
Dysphagia (swallowing impairment) is a serious health condition seen in many age-related disease and injury processes. Although videofluoroscopy (VF) is an international "gold standard" dysphagia diagnostic exam, there is a paucity of available normative physiologic VF reference values in healthy adults across the age span to guide interpretation of these examinations. In this project, the investigators will extend previous work on the quantitative measurement of swallowing physiology from VF examinations to establish reference values for swallowing in healthy adults, and to identify clinical decision point values for differentiating healthy swallowing across the age span from disordered swallowing in several high-risk clinical populations to study dysphagia.
Detailed description
Dysphagia (swallowing impairment) is a serious health condition seen in many age-related disease and injury processes. Although videofluoroscopy (VF) is an international "gold standard" dysphagia diagnostic exam, there is a paucity of available normative physiologic VF reference values in healthy adults across the age span to guide interpretation of this examination. This fundamental gap in knowledge contributes to poor agreement in the identification of swallowing impairment and its underlying mechanisms. To enable better dysphagia diagnostics, there is a critical need to establish reference values for VF swallowing measures across the healthy age span. In a previous study, the investigators developed a rigorous method for measuring swallowing physiology from VF: the Analysis of Swallowing Physiology: Events, Kinematics and Timing (ASPEKT Method). That study led to publication of initial ASPEKT reference values from 40 young healthy adults (\<60 years) and preliminary analyses comparing data from healthy older adults and small cohorts of adults with dysphagia to these reference data. In this project, the investigtors will: * validate the ASPEKT Method healthy reference values for swallowing across the adult life span; and * profile swallowing patho-physiology in clinical groups where dysphagia is a cause of morbidity to identify clinical decision points that can be used for diagnosis and outcome measurement. This study will explore the following research questions: Research Question 1: Will \> 5% of healthy adult participants in a new sample show ASPEKT values outside the common reference interval calculated in a prior sample? • VF measures will be collected in a prospective sample of 280 healthy adults, controlling for sex, age, and bolus consistency. Updated reference interval boundaries for healthy swallowing will be calculated. Research Question 2: Do specific clinical conditions present with specific patterns of swallowing pathophysiology? • VF measures will be prospectively collected in 3 high-risk dysphagia cohorts: adults with Parkinson Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, adults in the acute stage post-stroke. Values for these clinical cohorts will be compared to age- and sex-matched reference values from healthy participants. This will delineate swallowing impairment profiles to inform clinical decision points for diagnosis.
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTVideofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VF)
A videofluoroscopy (VF) is a dynamic radiological evaluation of swallowing in which the participant swallows liquid or food boluses of different consistencies prepared with barium contrast. The x-rays are recorded at 30 frames per second.
Sponsors
University Health Network, Toronto
University of Florida
McMaster University
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Ohio State University
University of Cincinnati
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Healthy Volunteers: no history of swallowing difficulties. 2. Clinical cohorts: physician confirmed diagnosis of the condition of interest plus symptoms of swallowing difficult, defined as a score \>/=200 on the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire.
Exclusion criteria
* cognitive communication difficulties that may hinder comprehension of the study documents * known allergies to latex, due to the possibility that these items will come into contact with the oral mucosa during data collection * current pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants with unsafe swallowing | Baseline | Swallowing safety requires the ability to protect the airway to prevent penetration-aspiration (the entry of food or liquid material into the airway during swallowing). Swallowing safety will be measured using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale, an 8-point categorical scale which captures the depth to which any material enters the airway and whether or not the material is ejected. Levels 1 and 2 on the scale are considered safe, while levels \> 2 are considered unsafe. Actual scale scores (1-8) will be recorded and then converted to binary categorical scores (\< 3 vs \>/= 3). The frequency (count) of participants showing scores \> 2 will be reported by bolus consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquids). |
| Number of participants with impaired swallowing efficiency | Baseline | Swallowing efficiency requires the ability to move a bolus of food or liquid from the mouth through the pharynx into the esophagus in a single swallow without leaving residue behind in the pharynx. Residue is material remaining behind in the pharynx after the swallow. Residue will be measured by tracing the area of barium visible on a lateral view x-ray (in pixels, using ImageJ software) and dividing that area by the squared length of the C2-C4 cervical spine. This cervical spine scalar provides a common anatomical reference that is a proxy for pharyngeal size, and enables the comparison of residue severity across different people with different neck length and pharynx size. In healthy swallowing, residue is expected to be minimal, i.e. less than 1% (C2-4)squared. The frequency (count) of participants showing residue above this threshold will be reported by bolus consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquids). |
| Number of participants with delayed airway closure ("Time-to-laryngeal-vestibule-closure") | Baseline | Swallowing safety requires the ability to protect the airway to prevent penetration-aspiration (the entry of food or liquid material into the airway during swallowing). Closure of the entrance to the airway ("laryngeal vestibule closure" or LVC) must be achieved in a timely manner. Time-to-LVC will be measured, i.e., the time interval between onset of the pharyngeal swallow (i.e. onset of the hyoid burst movement) and the first frame showing the most-complete closure of the laryngeal vestibule. In healthy adults, the upper limits (97.5th percentile value) for this measure are currently reported to be 267 ms on thin liquids, 367 ms on slightly thick liquids, 367 ms on mildly thick liquids, 300 ms on moderately thick liquids and 267 ms on extremely thick liquids. The frequency (count) of participants displaying time-to-LVC measures above these limits will be reported by bolus consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquid). |
| Number of participants with poor pharyngeal constriction | Baseline | Efficient clearance of a bolus of food or liquid through the pharynx in swallowing requires constriction of the pharynx. In healthy adults, there is typically no unobliterated space visible in the pharynx on a lateral view x-ray image on the frame of maximum constriction. ImageJ software will be used to measure the area of unobliterated pharyngeal space, which is expressed as a % of an anatomical reference scalar defined as the squared length of the C2-C4 cervical spine \[%(C2-4)squared\]. Larger unobliterated area reflects impairment in pharyngeal constriction. In healthy adults, the upper limits (97.5th percentile) for this measure are currently reported to be 6.2%(C2-4)squared on thin, 5% on slightly thick, 7.5% on mildly thick, 4.9% on moderately thick and 3.8% on extremely thick liquids. The frequency (count) of participants with pharyngeal constriction area above these limits will be reported by bolus consistency. |
Countries
Canada, United States
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORCatriona M Steele, PhD
University Health Network, Toronto
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREmily K Plowman, PhD
Ohio State University
Outcome results
None listed