Skip to content

Standard Cut Rate 27-Gauge System Versus Ultrahigh-Speed 27-Gauge System in Macular Surgery

Standard Cut Rate 27-Gauge System Versus Ultrahigh-Speed 27-Gauge System in Macular Surgery : A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05497128
Enrollment
66
Registered
2022-08-11
Start date
2022-09-30
Completion date
2023-08-31
Last updated
2022-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Macular Disease

Keywords

Macular disease, Vitrectomy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficiency and safety of ultrahigh-speed cut rate 27-gauge system (27+®GA HYPERVIT® Vitrectomy Probe (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA)) and standard cut rate 27-gauge vitrectomy system (27+®GA Advanced ULTRAVIT® Vitrectomy Probe (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA)).

Detailed description

During the last few decades, there have been dramatic changes in vitreoretinal surgery field with improvements in the performance of surgical retina equipment. As the innovation trend has been moving toward the smaller instrument calibers, the 27-gauge vitrectomy system has been developed. However, the vitrectomy system with the smaller calibers have limitations such as reduced instrument rigidity, limited availability of instrumentation, and decreased flow rate. To overcome these limitations, active developments have been ongoing to increase vitreous cutting speed, enlargement of the cutting port size, and enlargement of inner shaft to enable higher flow rates. Especially, the ultrahigh-speed cutter with improved cutting speed has the advantage of enabling safer vitrectomy because the faster cutting speed reduces retinal movement and minimizes the risk of iatrogenic retinal breaks. However, ultrahigh-speed cutting has a limitation in that it can reduce the flow rate through the vitreous cutter as it affects the duty cycle (percentage of time the cutter port is open relative to the complete cutting cycle). Therefore, the duty cycle of ultrahigh-speed cutter has also been improved so as not to delay the time for vitrectomy. The investigators would like to evaluate the efficiency and safety of vitrectomy using a recently released ultra high-speed cut rate 27-gauge system (27+®GA HYPERVIT® Vitrectomy Probe (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA)) and a standard cut rate 27-gauge system (27+®GA Advanced ULTRAVIT® Vitrectomy Probe (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA)) by comparing the duration of vitrectomy and the rate of complications.

Interventions

DEVICEUltrahigh-speed cut rate 27-gauge system

The ultrahigh-speed cut rate 27-gauge system (27+®GA HYPERVIT® Vitrectomy Probe (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA))

DEVICEStandard cut rate 27-gauge system

The current standard cut rate 27-gauge vitrectomy system (27+®GA Advanced ULTRAVIT® Vitrectomy Probe (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA))

Sponsors

Alcon Research
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All consecutive eyes requiring macular surgery (i.e. epiretinal membrane, vitreomacular traction etc.) that underwent 27-gauge vitrectomy at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (SNUBH) from September 2022 to August 2023. Patients will be randomized to receive 27-gauge vitrectomy with 20,000 cpm probes (20K group) or 27-gauge vitrectomy with 10,000 cpm probes (standard group).

Exclusion criteria

1. Previously vitrectomized eye 2. Trauma cases 3. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy with fibrovascular membranes 4. Retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy 5. Macular hole 6. Endophthalmitis 7. Inability to consent for procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficiency of core vitrectomyDuring the vitrectomyTime to completion of core vitrectomy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraoperative complicationsDuring the vitrectomyi.e. iatrogenic retinal breaks, intraocular bleeding, retinal detachment, etc.
Postoperative complicationsPostoperative period within 4 months after the vitrectomyi.e. intraocular bleeding, retinal detachment, etc.
Efficiency of peripheral vitrectomyDuring the vitrectomyTime to completion of peripheral vitrectomy
Efficiency of surgeryDuring the surgeryTime to completion of the surgery

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactKyu Hyung Park, M.D., Ph.D.
jiani4@snu.ac.kr82-31-787-7373
Backup ContactSe Joon Woo, M.D.
sejoon1@snu.ac.kr82-31-787-7379

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026