Skip to content

Assessing Ultra-low Dose PET/CT and CT-less PET Using a Long Axial Field-of-view PET/CT System

Assessing the Clinical Acceptability of Ultra-low Dose PET/CT and CT-less PET Using a Long Axial Field-of-view PET/CT System: a Single-centre, Single-blinded Method Agreement Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05496920
Acronym
ULD-PET
Enrollment
44
Registered
2022-08-11
Start date
2022-05-05
Completion date
2024-08-08
Last updated
2024-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

PET/CT

Keywords

PET/CT, low dose, long-axial field-of-view, extended field-of-view, total-body PET

Brief summary

Latest generation extended axial field-of-view (FOV) PET/CT systems offer the potential for substantial reductions in applied radiopharmaceutical necessary for a clinical scan. However, such low-dose examination protocols have yet to be robustly tested or demonstrated to be non-inferior. Furthermore, extended FOV scanners offer the potential for CT-less attenuation correction of the PET emission data, making clinically acceptable ultra-low dose examination protocols with radiation exposures of \< 1 millisievert possible for the first time. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the clinical acceptability of such low and ultra-low dose scanning protocols in a head-to-head prospective study against a full-dose scan using a regular FOV system

Detailed description

The first installation of a long-axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT system occurred in October 2020 at the department for nuclear medicine in Bern. This scanner along with recently introduced total-body scanners (TB-PET/CT) represent a substantial step forward in terms of nuclear medicine imaging technology. In conjunction with recent improvements in time-of-flight resolution and fully-digital detection technology, such systems offer surpassed sensitivity with improvements in image quality, lesion detection and diagnostic certainty. In contrast to LAFOV systems, standard axial field of view (SAFOV) scanners suffer from limited detection efficiency, where 90% of emitted photons go undetected owing to the ability to capture signal from only a small portion of the body (termed bed position or bp). However, while a number of studies are able to simulate lower applied radiopharmaceutical activities through the re-sampling of PET-sinogrammes or the rebinning of list-mode data, few studies adequately test the application of lower radiopharmaceutical activities, where limited data are available to justify the deviation from clinical routine. The clinical acceptability of such low-dose scans, in terms of lesion detection, image quality and lesion quantification is yet to be determined, which this study aims to address.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTFD-PET/CT

Standard of care PET/CT with full dose (FD) of the radiopharmaceutical

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTLD-PET/CT

Additional low dose PET/CT performed within protocol defined time frame LD-PET/CT with additional ultra-low dose CT-less reconstruction

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Scan reviewers will be masked to dose and scan reconstruction method.

Intervention model description

Patients will receive first a standard of care PET/CT and then an additional low dose PET/CT. The low dose PET/CT will be reconstructed using a standard CT for attenuation correction (LD-PET/CT) and with a novel CT-less method using transmission data (ultra low dose ULD-PET/CT).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults (\>18 years) able to provide informed consent for inclusion, willing and able to undergo a PET/CT for the detection or staging of cancer. * Individuals undergoing a PET/CT with 18F-FDG for the investigation of known or suspected NSCLC. * Upper fasting plasma glucose levels of \<8.3 mmol/L (\<150 mg/dL) (as measured \>30 mins prior to the administration of the radiopharmaceutical).

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are unable to consent to a second study-specific examination * Patients with claustrophobia requiring medication. * Patients who commence active treatment of a cancer or other pathology between scans. * Patients who have not fasted for \> 4 hours prior to the study. * Insulin dependent diabetics.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intra-rater correlation coefficient2-6 weeks following scanICC for Cancer Stage using the union for international cancer control (UICC) TNM (T= tumor, N= nodal stage, M = metastasis) System (8th Edition) for low dose positron emission and computed tomography (LD-PET/CT) exams compared to the standard of care (SOC) full-dose (FD)-PET/CT as assessed by a panel of physicians

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intra-rater correlation coefficient2-6 weeks following scanICC for ultra-low dose (ULD)-PET/CT compared to FD- and LD-PET/CT
Lesion uptake2-6 weeks following scanComposite outcome assessing lesion quantification in terms of peak standardised uptake value (SUVpeak), tumour to background (TBR), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and tumour glycolytic activity (TLG) for ULD- and LD-PET/CT compared to the standard of care FD-PET/CT
Image quality2-6 weeks following scanComposite outcome assessing image quality in terms of tumour to background ratio (TBR) and signal to noise (SNR), defined as the reciprocal coefficient of variation (COV) for ULD- and LD-PET/CT compared to the standard of care FD-PET/CT
Agreement2-6 weeks following scanInter-reader agreement for the primary outcome (UICC cancer stage) shall be compared between LD and FD-PET/CT
Diagnostic accuracy2-6 weeks following scanAssessment of the positive predictive value (PPV) for LD- and FD-PET/CT for patients who undergo surgery or bronchoscopy and where histopathological confirmation of true positive (TP) and false positive (FP) findings are available
Subjective quality2-6 weeks following scanImage quality (subjective) as rated by five independent nuclear medicine physicians on a five-point Likert scale (1= unacceptable, 2=poor, 3=moderate, 4=good, 5=high) for ULD- and LD-PET/CT compared to the standard of care FD-PET/CT

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acceptability2-6 weeks following scanAdditional outcome of interest: Patient and referrer acceptability of low-dose PET/CT examinations examined by means of a structured questionnaire.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026