Skip to content

Efficacy of Tadalafil/Solifenacin VS Tamsulosin/Solifenacin Combination Therapy for BPH/OAB

Efficacy of Tadalafil and Solifenacin Versus Tamsulosin and Solifenacin Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05494567
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-08-10
Start date
2021-11-08
Completion date
2022-08-31
Last updated
2022-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Overactive Bladder

Keywords

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Overactive Bladder, tadalafil, combination therapy for BPH

Brief summary

The investigators will compare the efficacy and safety of tadalafil/solifenacin combination therapy versus tamsulosin/solifenacin combination therapy for the treatment of BPH/OAB in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Detailed description

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most commonly diagnosed diseases in aging men worldwide. It is commonly associated with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) including voiding symptoms such as decreased force of stream, intermittent stream, hesitancy and sensation of incomplete bladder emptying and storage symptoms such as frequent urination, urgency and nocturia. LUTS especially storage symptoms interfere with the daily activities and adversely affect the quality of life (QoL). Alpha-1 adrenergic receptor blockers have been used as a first-line treatment of LUTS suggestive of BPH (LUTS/BPH). Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (tadalafil) have recently been used as initial treatment of LUTS/BPH. It was confirmed that once daily use of tadalafil 5 mg as a monotherapy is safe and has similar efficacy when compared to tamsulosin. Combination therapy could be used in patients who have BPH with overactive bladder (BPH/OAB) and still have persistent storage symptoms despite α1- adrenergic blockers. Anticholinergics in combination with α1- adrenergic blockers have been reported to be effective in those patients. Moreover, it has been reported that tadalafil has similar efficacy and safety to solifenacin when used in combination with tamsulosin for patients with persistent storage symptoms refractory to α1- adrenergic blockers. In another study, tadalafil/mirabegron combination therapy was used for BPH/OAB and its effect appeared to be greater than the effect of tadalafil monotherapy. Also, the combination therapy of tadalafil and solifenacin was approved to achieve higher response than tadalafil monotherapy in improvement of persistent storage symptoms associated with BPH. It was established that tadalafil can be used as a monotherapy to relieve both voiding and storage LUTS and it can be used in combination with tamsulosin or mirabegron to treat BPH/OAB. However, there is limited evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of the combined use of tadalafil and solifenacin for the treatment of BPH/OAB. Therefore, in this study, the investigators will compare the efficacy and safety of tadalafil/solifenacin combination therapy versus tamsulosin/solifenacin combination therapy for the treatment of BPH/OAB in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Interventions

patients with BPH/OAB will be treated with combination therapy of tadalafil plus solifenacin for 12 weeks in group 1

DRUGTamsulosin Hcl 0.4 mg

patients with BPH/OAB will be treated with combination therapy of tamsulosin plus solifenacin for 12 weeks in group 2

patients with BPH/OAB will be treated with combination therapy of tadalafil plus solifenacin in group 1 and tamsulosin plus solifenacin in group 2 for 12 weeks

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Ability to give informed consent and reply to questionnaires. 2. Age ≥ 45 years 3. IPSS ≥ 8 4. OABSS ≥ 5, urgency subscore ≥2

Exclusion criteria

1. Untreated urinary tract infection (UTI). 2. Postvoid residual (PVR) more than 150 mL 3. Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). 4. Depression or any psychogenic disorders. 5. Diabetes mellitus, hypertension or severe cardiovascular disease. 6. Prior radiation therapy to the pelvic area. 7. Prostate cancer or bladder tumor. 8. Past history of tuberculosis 9. Allergy or contraindication to the used medications 10. Urethral stricture 11. Indwelling urethral catheter 12. Vesical stone.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse effects3 monthsAppearance of adverse effects related to the used medications will be reported.
Change in ultrasound measurement of post-void residual urine (PVR) from baseline3 monthsChange in PVR from baseline will be compared.
Change in maximum flow rate (Qmax) from baseline3 monthsChange in Qmax from baseline will be compared.
Change in international prostate symptom score (IPSS) from baseline3 monthsChange in IPSS from baseline will be compared. The change of -3 will be estimated as the minimal threshold for a meaningful change. The score has a range from 0 to 35 and higher scores means a worse outcome.
Change in overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) from baseline3 monthsChange in OABSS from baseline will be compared. The change of -3 will be estimated as the minimal threshold for a meaningful change. The score has a range from 0 to 15 and higher scores means a worse outcome.
Change in IPSS-quality of life (QoL) score from baseline3 monthsChange in IPSS-QoL score from baseline will be compared. It is a single question with a score ranges from 0 to 6 and higher scores means a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in international index of erectile function-15 (IIEF-15)3 monthschange in IIEF-15 in sexually active patients will be compared.
change in ejaculatory domain of male sexual health questionnaire (Ej-MSHQ)3 monthschange in Ej-MSHQ in sexually active patients will be compared.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026