Skip to content

Comparison of Mechanical Power Calculations of Volume Control and Pressure Control Modes

Comparison of Mechanical Power Calculations of Volume Control and Pressure Control Modes: A Prospective Observational Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05494554
Enrollment
36
Registered
2022-08-10
Start date
2020-01-01
Completion date
2022-01-22
Last updated
2022-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury

Brief summary

The management of ARDS, which is one of the important problems of intensive care patients, has gained popularity with the pandemic. Mechanical ventilation is an important life-saving treatment in ARDS patients. However, when not used correctly, it can cause Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury (VILI). Therefore, lung protective ventilation should be applied to minimize VILI in ARDS patients. Mechanical power is one of the parameters that guides intensivist in predicting VILI.

Detailed description

The goal of mechanical ventilation in ARDS patients is to improve oxygenation by reducing the work of breathing . With this aim, the orientation towards sensitive ventilation strategies has increased in the light of experience and scientific data from the past to the present. Today, the concept of Mechanical Power (MP) has been developed, which combines different variables, such as tidal volume, drive pressure, gas flow, respiratory rate, and PEEP, which have been associated with VILI in various studies, into a single parameter. In this study, the investigators used the simplified MP equation (MPvcv (simpl)) developed by Gattinoni et al. for power calculation in volume control mode and the simplified MP equation (MPpcv(simpl)) developed by Becher et al. for power calculation in pressure control mode. Thus, the investigators aimed to compare the volume control and pressure control modes over the concept of MP.

Interventions

DEVICEChanging mechanical ventilation mode

On the 2nd day of intensive care hospitalization, while under deep sedation and in the controlled mode (VCV or PRVC) and in the supine position, the ventilator in the VCV mode was switched to PRVC mode for 60 minutes without changing any of the set ventilator settings (RR, PEEP, TV, I:E ratio). Likewise, if it is in PRVC mode, it is also switched to VCV mode for 60 minutes. MP values were calculated from the minute respiratory parameters of all patients with the MP formulas defined in the software.

Sponsors

Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with confirmed Covid-19 diagnosis in intensive care unit (ICU) and diagnosed with ARDS according to Berlin criteria * Intubated patients which treated in the supine position on the second day of ICU admission

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a known diagnosis of COPD * Patients experiencing hemodynamic instability during ventilation * Prone pozisyonda olan hastalar * Patients receiving inotropic support * Patients with missing data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mechanical power values of different ventilation modes60 minutesWe aimed to compare the volume control and pressure control modes over the mechanical power values.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026