Skip to content

Pharmacokinetics and Point of Care Testing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Subjects

Study on the Pharmacokinetics and Point of Care Testing After a Single Dose of 150 mg Dabigatran, 20 mg Rivaroxaban, 5 mg Apixaban, and 60 mg Edoxaban in Healthy Male Subjects

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05491460
Acronym
PHAPOCU
Enrollment
24
Registered
2022-08-08
Start date
2022-07-01
Completion date
2023-12-30
Last updated
2022-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anticoagulant Therapy

Keywords

anticoagulant, direct oral anticoagulant, apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, coagulation, point of care method

Brief summary

DOACs are increasingly used since 8 years. Standard coagulation tests (Prothrombin time \[PT\] and activated partial thromboplastin time \[aPTT\]) from plasma samples show a high variation. Special coagulation tests like hemoclot for dabigatran and chromogenic substrate assays for Rivaroxaban, Apixaban, and Edoxaban are time-consuming and can be performed only in specialized laboratories. In specific medical situations like in patients such as emergency procedures, stroke (before starting thrombolytic therapy), trauma, general surgery or other invasive procedures, it may be necessary for medical decision making to know the presence or absence of a DOAC in patient's body fluid. Until now there is no rapid, specific and sensitive coagulation test available in the market.

Detailed description

This prospective, open-label, controlled, not randomized trial in healthy volunteers to investigate comparatively the pharmacokinetics of the direct oral anticoagulants in plasma and in urine with LC-MS/MS and in urine by DOAC Dipstick.

Interventions

DRUGApixaban 5 MG Tab

oral intake

DRUGDabigatran 150 MG Tab

oral intake

DRUGEdoxaban 60Mg Tab

oral intake

DRUGRivaroxaban 20 MG Tab

oral intake

Sponsors

Doasense GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Fully signed and dated written informed consent * Age \>18 years * healthy

Exclusion criteria

* Patients not able to provide urine samples. * Patients not able to understand the informed consent or severe mentally disabled. * Patients in the end-stage of a severe disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy and specificity of the DOAC Dipstick compare to LC-MSMSup to 6 monthsAssess the accuracy and specificity of the IVD for oral direct factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors from urine samples of patients True positive and true negative rate of the point of care test (POCT) by comparison with the results obtained by bioanalytical quantification

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of qualitative POCT with quantitative LC-MS/MSup to 6 monthsComparison of qualitative POCT with quantitative LC-MS/MS Investigator readings of POCT test results as compared to LC-MS/MS
Questionnaire on handling and usabilityup to 6 monthsSpecific questions to be answered using Lickert scale by personal performing the test

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026