Cervical Cancer, Screening, Stigma
Conditions
Brief summary
It is an interventional study to assess the effectiveness of the cervical cancer stigma reduction intervention on cancer stigma score and cervical cancer screening uptake in Nepal
Detailed description
Despite the presence of ample evidence, that stigma is one of the major reasons for low screening coverage, Nepal does not have a single stigma reduction intervention targeted among women to increase cervical cancer screening coverage. Therefore, we aim to assess the effectiveness of a stigma reduction education program on stigma score and cervical cancer screening uptake in Nepal. We will conduct an interventional study in Budanilkhantha Municipality. A computer-based program will randomly allocate the 12 wards of Budanilkhantha Municipality with an allocation ratio 1:1; 6 wards in intervention group and 6 wards in control group. We will conduct a "stigma reduction education program" in the intervention group. After that we will follow up the participants for 2 months to see the effectiveness of a stigma reduction education program on stigma score and cervical cancer screening uptake in Nepal. We will analyze data using STATA 14. We will use independent tests to find the mean difference between cervical cancer screening uptake and cervical cancer stigma score. The difference in mean among the two groups will actually be the difference due to intervention given. Findings from this study will help managers and stakeholders to formulate and improve strategies on screening programs and develop programs to reduce stigma on cervical cancer among women in Nepal.
Interventions
BEHAVIORAL"Cervical Cancer Stigma Reduction Intervention"
Change in knowledge: Cervical cancer burden in Nepal, signs and symptoms, preventive measures available, lifestyle modifications, HPV vaccination, early diagnosis, screening, and treatment. Change in Stigma 1. Para-social contact * Video of a person facing cervical cancer what symptoms she got, how she dealt with it, and how she overcame it. * Experiences of a cervical cancer survivor so that women personalize the information by relating it to their own life experiences by changing their attitude and behavior. 2. Participatory learning techniques * Personal stories: Voluntary self-reflection of any stigma they perceive on cervical cancer or their community perceives cervical cancer. * Group Discussion: Discuss the drivers of stigma, facilitators of sigma, types of stigma prevalent in your community, and consequences of stigma. 3. Myths vs facts: Negative attitudes, myths, and misconceptions about cervical cancer will be contraindicated by factual information.
Sponsors
Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
30 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Women aged 30-60 years (the age range recommended for VIA screening in Nepal * Married women * Residents of Budanilkantha Municipality
Exclusion criteria
* Women who have already undergone screening within 5 years. * Women with hearing or mental disorders * Pregnant women * Less than 6 weeks postpartum * Mothers who had lived in the community for less than 6 months to perform seasonal work (e.g. in brick kilns) or visitors in the family. * Women who are already diagnosed with cervical pre-cancer and cancer and have undergone hysterectomy.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean stigma score | Measured at baseline and endline (after 2 months gap from baseline) | Change in mean stigma score using Cancer Stigma Scale at baseline and follow up |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical cancer screening uptake | Measured within a month after endline | Number of women attending cervical cancer screening program in intervention and control groups |
Countries
Nepal
Outcome results
None listed