Skip to content

Bellomic PCA in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery

Comparison of Postoperative Side Effects and Analgesic Quality According to the Combination of Fentanyl and Ketorolac Versus Fentanyl After Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05489796
Enrollment
72
Registered
2022-08-05
Start date
2022-06-30
Completion date
2022-08-31
Last updated
2023-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery

Brief summary

In laparoscopic gynecological surgery, when intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) device is used after surgery, the degree of postoperative side effects and pain control is compared when a combination of fentanyl and ketorolac is administered compared to when fentanyl alone is used.

Interventions

DRUGFentanyl selector

Selector (1 ml; Lock out 10 min): Fentanyl 200 mcg + N/S 16 ml = total 20 ml

DRUGFentanyl continuous

Continuous (2 ml/hr): fentanyl 700 mcg + N/S 86 ml = total 100 ml

DRUGKetorolac continuous

Continuous (2 ml/hr): Ketorolac 180 mg + N/S 94 ml = total 100 ml

Sponsors

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* American society of anesthesiology physical status 1 or 2 * Patients scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia * Patients who applied for the use of IV-PCA after surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with side effects of opioids * Patients with hypersensitivity to aspirin or non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs * Patients with alcohol or drug dependence * Patients with peptic ulcers, patients with gastrointestinal bleeding * Patients with suspected cerebrovascular hemorrhage, organic disorders, or damage to the head related to increased intracranial pressure * Symptoms of bronchial asthma or bronchospasm * Patients with severe respiratory depression * Moderate to severe renal impairment * Patients with reduced blood volume or dehydration * polyps in the nose * angioedema * Patients with or a history of the convulsive disease * Patients for whom the use of neuromuscular blocking agents is contraindicated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the occurrence of postoperative nauseapostoperative 0 hour, 2 hour, 6 hour, 12 hour, 24 hourConfirm the occurrence of postoperative nausea.
Change in the occurrence of postoperative vomitingpostoperative 0 hour, 2 hour, 6 hour, 12 hour, 24 hourConfirm the occurrence of postoperative vomiting.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the use of rescue antiemeticspostoperative 0 hour, 2 hour, 6 hour, 12 hour, 24 hourInvestigate the use of rescue antiemetics.
Change of postoperative pain scorepostoperative 0 hour, 2 hour, 6 hour, 12 hour, 24 hourPostoperative pain scores are scored on a scale of 0-10.
Change in the use of rescue analgesicspostoperative 0 hour, 2 hour, 6 hour, 12 hour, 24 hourInvestigate the use of rescue analgesics.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026