Maxillary Protraction in Class III Adolescent After Using (MSE)
Conditions
Keywords
Expansion, maxillary protraction, class III
Brief summary
The aim of this study of this study is to compare two protocol of maxillary protraction in class III adolescent after using (MSE) Alt-RAMEC vs conventional rapid palatal expansion using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)
Interventions
DEVICEMaxillary skeletal expander with protraction face mask with Alt-RAMEC protocol.
The current study was conducted on a total sample of 21 young adult orthodontic patients presented with class 3 retrognathic maxilla with or without transverse maxillary deficiency by Alt-RAMEC protocol.
DEVICEMaxillary skeletal expander with protraction face mask with conventional protocol
The current study was conducted on a total sample of 21 young adult orthodontic patients presented with class 3 retrognathic maxilla with or without transverse maxillary deficiency by conventional protocol
Sponsors
Al-Azhar University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Class3 Patients suffering maxillary collapse with a skeletal background * Patients with retrognathic maxilla. * Patients with anterior cross-bite or incisor end-to-end relationship * Patients with unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbite. * Patients with no periodontal disease. * Patients with good oral hygiene and general health. * No systemic diseases that may affect bone quality or interfere with orthodontic treatment. * Patients with no previous orthodontic treatment.
Exclusion criteria
* previous orthodontic treatment. * Craniofacial syndrome.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| amount of maxillary protraction | 6 months | protraction of maxilla using CBCT |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed