Substance-Related Disorders, Treatment Adherence
Conditions
Brief summary
This K23 study is an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type I design to determine the effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing at Intake (MII), relative to intake-as-usual on client engagement and mechanisms of engagement among adults seeking outpatient addiction treatment. We also will obtain personnel feedback on the feasibility of implementing MII into standard practice by having personnel from the addiction treatment study sites complete implementation climate measures before Motivational Interviewing (MI) training and post-clinical trial, as well as an individual interview on implementation feasibility post-trial.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALMotivational Interviewing at Intake (MII)
The MII will involve a goal-oriented and collaborative conversation about why the client wants treatment now, and how treatment might fit with his/her most important values. The provider will use open questions, reflective listening and autonomy support in a flexible, non-authoritative manner. Rather than asking specific questions in different life domains, the provider will explore with the client their desires, abilities, reasons, and needs for treatment, how treatment fits with their values, and what successful treatment looks like to them. The client's language about change will be strategically reinforced to increase its frequency and strength across the session.
BEHAVIORALIntake as Usual (IAU)
In line with the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) guidelines, the IAU condition involves a semi-structured interview of the client's psychosocial history and clients answer a series of questions in the following domains: support system, living situation, educational, occupational, family, and medical history.
Sponsors
University of New Mexico
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Intervention model description
Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Type 1 Design
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
(client participants): * English-speaking adults seeking treatment for alcohol or other drug use at one of two outpatient addiction treatment programs * Provision of signed and dated informed consent form * Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures * Physically withdrawn from alcohol or other drugs Inclusion Criteria (personnel participants): * English-speaking adults currently employed at one of the two outpatient addiction treatment programs * Provision of electronic informed consent
Exclusion criteria
(client participants): * Experiencing severe withdrawal symptoms * Actively psychotic, manic, and/or suicidal
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants who attended the first outpatient treatment program session based on electronic medical record review | up to 36 weeks | Treatment entry is determined by review of electronic medical record of whether clients attended their first scheduled treatment session |
| Number of treatment sessions attended during the three-month outpatient treatment program based on electronic medical record review | up to 36 weeks | Number of treatment sessions that clients attend is determined by review of electronic medical record and calculating number of treatment sessions attended. |
| Number of participants who completed the three-month outpatient treatment program based on electronic medical record review | up to 36 weeks | Completion of the three-month outpatient treatment program is determined by review of electronic medical record |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline in client readiness to enter treatment on the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale (URICA) at 1 hour post-intake | baseline and 1 hour post-intake | The URICA is a validated, self-report measure of client readiness for treatment engagement. Possible scores range from 32 to 160 with higher scores indicative greater readiness to enter treatment. Change = (Hour 1 score - Baseline Score). |
| Score on therapeutic alliance on the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) at 1-hour post-intake | 1 hour post-intake | The WAI is a validated, self-report measure of client perceptions of the therapeutic process by assessing three sub scales: Goals, Bond, and Tasks. Possible scores on sub scales range from 12 to 84 with higher scores indicative of better therapeutic alliance. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
CONTACTMargo Hurlocker, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMargo Hurlocker, PhD
University of New Mexico
Outcome results
None listed