Skip to content

Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

Deep Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Peripheral Neuropathic Pain. A Randomized Double-blind Sham-controlled Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05488808
Acronym
BrainStim
Enrollment
17
Registered
2022-08-05
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2023-11-24
Last updated
2023-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuropathic Pain

Keywords

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Brief summary

Peripheral neuropathic pain is a disabling chronic pain condition that is difficult to treat. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the motor cortex is a treatment method with growing evidence in its ability to alleviate neuropathic pain. This also applies to new deep rTMS coils which permits stimulation of larger cortical areas and with deeper penetration. The aim of this study is to investigate the analgesic efficacy of 5 days of deep rTMS compared to sham stimulation. We will also assess effects of deep rTMS on sleep, psychological fatctors, everyday functioning, and executive functioning.

Interventions

DEVICErepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Deep rTMS is delivered with the Brainsway H7-coil (Brainsway, Jerusalem, Israel) applied via a helmet placed on the head targeting the primary motor cortex of the leg.

Sponsors

Oslo University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Blinding is achieved by inserting a card into the rTMS stimulator which determines whether the patient receives active or sham stimulation, making both participant and investigator blind towards group allocation. Care providers are also blinded to treatment allocation. Main efficacy analyses will be performed blinded without identification of participants and group allocation.

Intervention model description

Patients undergo stimulation with deep rTMS in a double blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a 2 x 2 cross-over design, receiving both active and placebo stimulation. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ration to one of two counterbalanced arms: either they first receive active rTMS and then sham rTMS after a 9 week washout period, or the first receive sham rTMS and then active rTMS after 9 weeks of washout.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18-80 years of age * Peripheral neuropathic pain related to postherpetic neuralgia, peripheral nerve injury, limb amputation, polyneuropathy or radiculopathy, fulfilling the criteria for probable or definite neuropathic pain (Finnerup et al. 2016) * Usual pain intensity at least 4/10 over the past 24 hrs using the numerical scale of the BPI at screening * Daily pain * Pain for at least 3 months * Stable pharmacological treatment for pain or no pharmaceutical treatment at least 1 month prior to inclusion participation * Ability to follow throughout the whole duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

atients with phantom limb pain after limb amputation * Any clinically significant or unstable medical or psychiatric disorder * Subjects protected by law (guardianship or tutelage measure) * History of or current substance abuse (alcohol, drugs) * Pending litigation * Contraindication to rTMS (past severe head trauma, history of epilepsy or ongoing epilepsy, active cerebral tumour, past neurosurgical intervention, intracranial hypertension, implanted devices not compatible such as cardiac pacemaker and neurostimulator, cochlear implants, pregnancy or lactation. All women of childbearing age will be required to have negative pregnancy test at inclusion and to be using contraception) * Pain conditions more severe than peripheral neuropathic pain * Inability to understand the protocol or to fill out the forms * Other ongoing research protocol or recent past protocol within one month before the inclusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Usual pain intensity over the past 24 hoursAnalgesic efficacy of active and sham treatment is measured as the change in pain intensity scores between baseline values (one week before treatment) and 1 week after the last stimulation. Measurement ends 3 weeks after last stimulation]Measured every day in a diary at the same hour (end of the day) on an 11-point NRS (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain intensity imaginable of the current pain condition)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity over the last 24 hoursBaseline, 1 week and 3 weeks after the end of each stimulation periodMaximum and minimum pain intensity hours, rated from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)
Pain unpleasantness during the last 24 hoursBaseline, 1 week and 3 weeks after the end of each stimulation periodMaximum, minimum, and usual pain unpleasantness, rated from 0 (no pain/unpleasantness) to 10 (unpleasantness as bad as you can imagine)
Intensity of dynamic mechanical allodyniaBaseline, 1 week and 3 weeks after the end of each stimulation periodDynamic mechanical allodynia is assessed using a brush (SOMEDIC). The outcome is the mean pain intensity of 3 brush strokes within 2 seconds intervals. The length of the brush stroke is 3 cm, measured on an 11-point NRS (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain intensity imaginable), disregarding the spontaneous ongoing pain.
Intensity of static mechanical allodyniaBaseline, 1 week and 3 weeks after the end of each stimulation periodStatic mechanical allodynia is measured with a stimulus lightly indenting the skin for 10 seconds. The outcome is the mean pain intensity of three presses, measured on an 11-point NRS (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain intensity imaginable), disregarding the spontaneous ongoing pain.
Proportion of respondersBaseline,1 week and 3 weeks after the end of each stimulation period]Proportion of responders with at least 30% and 50% usual pain intensity reduction compared to prestimulation values allowing to calculate Numbers Needed to Treat for 30 % and 50 % pain relief.
Percentage pain intensity reductionBaseline,1 week and 3 weeks after the end of each stimulation periodPercentage pain intensity reduction on an 11-point NRS (0 %= no pain reduction; 100% complete pain reduction)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleBaseline,1 week and 3 weeks after the end of each stimulation periodThe Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale includes 14 items scored as anxiety and depression scores, 7 items assessing depression and 7 anxiety
Usual pain intensity over the past 24 hoursAnalgesic efficacy of active and sham treatment is measured as the change in pain intensity scores between baseline values and 3 weeks after the last stimulationMeasured every day in a diary at the same hour on an 11-point NRS (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain intensity imaginable of the current pain condition)
Patient Global Impression of ChangeBaseline,1 week and 3 weeks after the end of each stimulation periodConsists of 7 items to evaluate the subjective improvement or deterioration (from very much improved to very much deteriorated)
Insomnia Severity IndexBaseline,1 week and 3 weeks after the end of each stimulation periodConsists of self-rated questions which maps sleep difficulties specific to insomnia on a 5 point Likert scale
Patient-Specific Functional ScaleBaseline,1 week and 3 weeks after the end of each stimulation periodThe Patient-Specific Functional Scale is a numeric rating scale that measures individually chosen functions that are inhibited by the pain. Patients rate from 0 (unable to perform activity) to 10 (able to perform activity)
Executive functioning using the CANTAB batteryBaseline,1 week and 3 weeks after the end of each stimulation periodComposite score and individual analyses of the paired associates learning test, stop signal task, spatial working memory test and the multitasking test weeks after the end of each stimulation period
Side-effectsImmediately after the first rTMS session for both stimulation periods and 1 week and 3 weeks after each stimulation periodSide effects using a specific side effects questionnaire specifically designed for assessment of safety in rTMS studies
Blinding3 weeks after the end of each stimulation periodBlinding questionnaire
Pain Catastrophizing ScaleBaseline,1 week and 3 weeks after the end of each stimulation periodConsists of 13 items describing the occurrence of thoughts and feelings that individuals may experience when in pain rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time)

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026