Skip to content

Healthcare Resource Utilization in Adults Diagnosed With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Healthcare Resource Utilization in Adults Diagnosed With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) With a Focus on Patients Treated With Rydapt (Midostaurin) in Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05488613
Enrollment
81
Registered
2022-08-04
Start date
2020-09-24
Completion date
2021-01-26
Last updated
2022-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Keywords

Acute myeloid leukemia,, midostaurin,, healthcare resource utilization

Brief summary

This was a non-interventional, retrospective registry study, utilizing electronic health record (EHR) data collected in the hospital district of Helsinki and Uusimaa (HUS). Real-world health care resource utilization (HCRU) of AML patients was characterized.

Detailed description

Adult patients (18 years or older) with the inclusion diagnosis, AML (ICD-10 C92.0), between 1.1.2013 - 30.6.2020 were followed from the index date (first ever record of the inclusion diagnosis) until the end of follow-up (30.6.2020), or death. This study did not involve any contacts to patients. The study inclusion period was changed from 1.1.2013 - 30.6.2020 specified in the protocol to 1.1.2016 - 30.6.2020 due to lack of medication data from pre-2016.

Interventions

DRUGMidostaurin

Midostaurin was administered in two different dosing options. Either as 2x25mg daily or 2x50mg daily.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who are diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (ICD-10 C92.0) during 1.1.2016-30.6.2020 * Adult (18 years or older) at the time of first diagnosis * Health registry data is available and accessible * Resident in the hospital district HUS at the time of index diagnosis

Exclusion criteria

\- AML patients with no treatment information

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients initiating midostaurin treatmentthroughout the study, approximately 5 yearsNumber of patients initiating midostaurin treatment were reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Midostaurin at induction and consolidation phasethroughout the study, approximately 5 yearsDuration of Midostaurin at induction and consolidation phase were reported.
Median average dose intensity in midostaurin treatment in induction and consolidation phasethroughout the study, approximately 5 yearsMedian average dose intensity in midostaurin treatment were reported.
Most frequent comorbidities at the time of AML diagnosisthroughout the study, approximately 5 yearsMost frequent comorbidities at the time of AML diagnosis were reported.
Number of patients who received Midostaurin at induction and consolidation phasesthroughout the study, approximately 5 yearsNumber of patients who received Midostaurin at induction and consolidation phases were reported.
Number of AML patients receiving midostaurin consolidation treatment in inpatient or outpatient care (based on given prescriptions)throughout the study, approximately 5 yearsNumber of AML patients receiving midostaurin consolidation treatment in inpatient or outpatient care (based on given prescriptions) were reported.
Mean HCRU and related costs in different disease stagesthroughout the study, approximately 5 yearsEstimate HCRU and related costs in different disease stages were reported.
Number of patients at the time of diagnosis (All treated AML patients)throughout the study, approximately 5 yearsNumber of patients at the time of diagnosis (All treated AML patients) were reported.

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026