Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma, Stage III Prostate Cancer AJCC v8, Stage IV Prostate Cancer AJCC v8
Conditions
Brief summary
This clinical trial evaluates whether having a trained peer navigator helps African American men with prostate cancer that has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic) understand and navigate the genetic testing process better than not having a peer navigator. Genetic testing for men with prostate cancer is very important for making treatment and management decisions. However, understanding the risks, benefits, and steps of genetic counseling and testing can be very challenging for patients. African American men are especially less likely to participant in genetic testing due to lack of awareness or understanding, cultural beliefs, finances, or mistrust of the healthcare system. A peer navigator, someone who helps a patient through the information and the process, may be helpful to some men. This study evaluates whether having a peer navigator throughout the genetic evaluation process helps patients understand and engage in the process more.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Develop a peer-based navigation program for African American (AA) men with prostate cancer (PCA). II. Conduct a pilot study of peer-navigated genetic evaluation vs. standard clinical care and assess feasibility of peer navigation. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: I. Evaluating the intervention effects on decisional conflict and PCA genetics knowledge. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE: I. Assessing trust of the healthcare system and satisfaction with the genetic evaluation process. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive assistance from a peer navigator during genetic evaluation processes. Peer navigators help patients schedule counseling appointments, discuss questions and concerns about testing, assist in saliva collection, schedule a post-test disclosure visit, and do a results and recommendations debrief. ARM II: Patients receive standard care during genetic evaluation processes. Patients receive genetic counseling, undergo genetic testing, schedule a post-test disclosure visit, and receive their genetic test results and recommendations per standard care.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALPatient Navigation
Receive peer navigation services
OTHERGenetic Counseling
Receive genetic counseling
OTHERSurvey Administration
Ancillary studies
OTHERBest Practice
Receive standard care
Sponsors
Thomas Jefferson University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Provide signed and dated informed consent form * English speaking only * Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study * Any individual \>= 18 years old * African American men who meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for testing will be offered participation. These criteria include any one of the following: (1) metastatic prostate cancer (PCA); (2) intraductal or ductal pathology; (3) T3a or higher; (4) grade group 4 or Gleason 8 or higher; (5) family history of breast, ovarian, prostate, pancreatic, colorectal, or uterine cancers in 3 or more blood relatives particularly if diagnosed at age \< 50. These criteria have been adapted from the NCCN Prostate Cancer (version 2.2021) and NCCN Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic (version 2.2021) guideline
Exclusion criteria
* Patients that do not meet the inclusion criteria and children under the age of 18 will be excluded * Anyone who has trouble understanding the consent or with significant anxiety detected during the consent process will also be excluded
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency of pretest genetic counseling engagement | Up to 4 years | Compared between randomized study groups. Tested using a chi-square test. Summarized between study groups in tables with descriptive statistics (e.g.'s, means and standard deviations if continuous, frequencies and percentages if discrete) with 95% confidence intervals and also graphically in data plots at each time they are assessed along with changes in responses over time. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean changes in decisional conflict for genetic testing | Up to 4 years | Compared between study groups over time. Summarized between study groups in tables with descriptive statistics (e.g.'s, means and standard deviations if continuous, frequencies and percentages if discrete) with 95% confidence intervals and also graphically in data plots at each time they are assessed along with changes in responses over time. Evaluated using mixed effects models with fixed effects for group indicator, time, and group-by-time interaction and random intercept effects for individual. |
| Mean changes in knowledge of cancer genetics | Up to 4 years | Compared between study groups over time. Summarized between study groups in tables with descriptive statistics (e.g.'s, means and standard deviations if continuous, frequencies and percentages if discrete) with 95% confidence intervals and also graphically in data plots at each time they are assessed along with changes in responses over time. Evaluated using mixed effects models with fixed effects for group indicator, time, and group-by-time interaction and random intercept effects for individual. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
CONTACTAmy Leader, DrPH, MPH
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAmy Leader, DrPH, MPH
Thomas Jefferson University
Outcome results
None listed