Skip to content

A Study To Describe The Use Of Tofacitinib After Use Of Rituximab In Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis In A Real-World Setting

Tofacitinib Use in Rituximab-Experienced RA Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05487703
Enrollment
318
Registered
2022-08-04
Start date
2022-11-14
Completion date
2022-12-23
Last updated
2024-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Brief summary

This study is to characterize the use of tofacitinib after use of rituximab in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in a real-world setting.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Enrolled in the CorEvitas RA Registry and initiated tofacitinib on or after November 2012. * Initiate tofacitinib (defined as first ever use of tofacitinib) at Registry enrollment visit or at a Registry follow-up visit after November 2012 * Have prior use of rituximab * Have CDAI measured at baseline and appropriate follow-up visit.

Exclusion criteria

* There are no

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in CDAI at 6 Months Follow-upBaseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])CDAI was a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the swollen joint counts (SJC), tender/painful joint counts (TJC), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) and physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA). CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher scores indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale; higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher scores indicated worse condition. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Year of Rituximab DiscontinuationsAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Number of participants were classified according to year of rituximab discontinuations and were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued RituximabAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Percentage of participants who discontinued rituximab were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Reason for Discontinuation of RituximabAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Number of participants were classified according to reasons for discontinuation of rituximab and were reported in this outcome measure. Reasons for discontinuation of rituximab included safety, effectiveness, insurance, participant doing well and other reasons. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Tofacitinib Initiation YearAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Number of participants were classified according to year of tofacitinib initiation and were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Type of Health Insurance PlanAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Number of participants according to type of health insurance plan was reported in this outcome measure. The health insurance plan included private, Medicare, Medicaid and no insurance. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib. One participant might have more than one type of insurance.
Number of Participants With College Graduation or Higher EducationAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Number of participants who were college graduate or had higher education were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Smoking StatusAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Number of participants according to smoking status was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Work StatusAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Number of participants according to work status was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Alcohol UseAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Number of participants according to alcohol use were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to History of ComorbiditiesAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Number of participants according to history of comorbidities were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib. One participant might have more than one history of comorbidities.
Duration of Rheumatoid Arthritis at Index DateAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Duration of rheumatoid arthritis in participants at the time of index date was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Age at Onset of Rheumatoid Arthritis at Index DateAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Participants age at onset of rheumatoid arthritis at the time of index date was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)CDAI was a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the swollen joint counts (SJC), tender/painful joint counts (TJC), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) and physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA). CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher scores indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS); higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher scores indicated worse condition. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to CDAI CategoriesAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Number of participants according to CDAI category were reported in this outcome measures. CDAI was simplified index for assessing disease activity comprising of SJC, TJC, PtGA and PGA. CDAI is numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher score indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; higher score indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher score indicated worse condition. Score range-Remission: CDAI less than or equal to (\<=) 2.8. Low Disease Activity: CDAI greater than (\>) 2.8 and \<= 10. Moderate Disease Activity: CDAI \> 10 and \<= 22. High Disease Activity: CDAI \> 22. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Tender Joint CountAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Tender joint count was used to measure the pain and inflammation in the joints, based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, where higher scores indicated worse condition. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Swollen Joint CountAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Swollen joint count was used to measure the pain and inflammation in the joints. Based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, where higher scores indicated worse condition. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Patient Global Assessment (PGA) VASAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)PGA-VAS was used to assess disease activity; assessed on 0-100 millimeter (mm) VAS; higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ)At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)mHAQ is the modified version of HAQ which simplifies it from 20 questions to 8 questions, which assessed the ability to perform tasks due to rheumatoid arthritis. It comprised of 8 questions on 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; grip; walk; hygiene; reach; and common activities over past week before specified time point. Eight items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, where 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total score ranged from 0 to 3, where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty, higher scores indicated worse functioning. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Pain VASAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Pain VAS was assessed using 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal line to rate pain. Score ranged from 0 mm to 100 mm; where, 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Fatigue VASAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Participants assessed their fatigue using a 0 to 100 mm VAS scale, where 0 mm = no fatigue and 100 mm = worst possible fatigue. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Domain Scores of 2 or HigherAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)EQ-5D-3L is a health profile questionnaire used to assess quality of life along 5 dimensions. Participants rated 5 aspects of health (walking, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) by choosing from 3 answering options (1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3=extreme problems). The mean of the summed score ranged from 1 to 3 with 1 corresponding to no problems and 3 corresponding to severe problems in the 5 dimensions, where higher score indicated more severe problems. In this outcome measure number of participants with a domain score of 2 or higher in each individual domain are reported. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Previous Drug Therapies With Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (csDMARD)At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Number of participants according to previous drug therapies with csDMARD were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Tofacitinib InitiationAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Number of participants were classified according to line of therapy in which Tofacitinib was initiated and were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Concomitant TherapiesAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Number of participants classified according to concomitant therapies were reported in this outcome measure. One participant might have received more than one concomitant therapy. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Percentage of Participants Who Used Rituximab (RTX) Directly Before TofacitinibAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Percentage of participants who used rituximab directly before tofacitinib were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Duration of Prior Rituximab (RTX) UseAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Duration of prior RTX use (in months) was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Rituximab InitiationAt index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)Number of participants were classified according to line of therapy in which Rituximab was initiated were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at 6 Months Follow-upBaseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])HAQ: self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in RA. The 20-question instrument assessed ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 functional areas: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, griping, and conducting daily activities. Eight items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, where 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total score ranged from 0 to 3, where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty, higher scores indicating worse functioning. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Change From Baseline in Pain VAS at 6 Months Follow-upBaseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])Pain VAS was assessed using 100 mm horizontal line to rate pain. Score ranged from 0 mm to 100 mm; where, 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Change From Baseline in Fatigue VAS at 6 Months Follow-upBaseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])Participants assessed their fatigue using a 0 to 100 mm VAS scale, where 0 mm = no fatigue and 100 mm = worst possible fatigue. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) at 6 Month Follow UpBaseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])MCID improvement was assessed based on health assessment questionnaire (HAQ). HAQ: self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in RA. Assessed based on ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 categories: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and conducting daily activities. Eight items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, where 0= without any difficulty, 1= with some difficulty, 2= with much difficulty, and 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total score ranged from 0 to 3, where 0= least difficulty and 3= extreme difficulty, higher scores indicating worse functioning. Achievement of MCID for HAQ was defined as decrease in minimum of 0.22 units from baseline. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Countries

Morocco

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), enrolled in CorEvitas RA Registry, initiated tofacitinib with a history of rituximab use on or after 06-Nov-2012, were included in this study.

Pre-assignment details

Total 3190 participants were screened, out of which 2872 participants did not met the inclusion criteria and only 318 participants were included in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tofacitinib
Participants diagnosed with RA, enrolled in CorEvitas RA registry who initiated tofacitinib with a history of rituximab use on or after 06-Nov-2012 were included in this reporting group. Duration of data collection for this study was from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022 (approximately 9 years).
318
Total318

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyInsurance Reasons6
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy60
Overall StudyOther19
Overall StudyParticipant not well5
Overall StudyPhysician Decision19

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTofacitinib
Age, Continuous59.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
Body Mass Index (BMI) Categorical
BMI (kg/m^2) <25
71 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI) Categorical
BMI (kg/m^2) 25.0 to <30
74 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI) Categorical
BMI (kg/m^2) >=30
169 Participants
Body Weight86.0 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
37 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
277 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
262 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
56 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Age at Onset of Rheumatoid Arthritis at Index Date

Participants age at onset of rheumatoid arthritis at the time of index date was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TofacitinibAge at Onset of Rheumatoid Arthritis at Index Date42.3 YearsStandard Deviation 13.9
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitAge at Onset of Rheumatoid Arthritis at Index Date42.2 YearsStandard Deviation 14.4
Primary

Change From Baseline in CDAI at 6 Months Follow-up

CDAI was a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the swollen joint counts (SJC), tender/painful joint counts (TJC), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) and physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA). CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher scores indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale; higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher scores indicated worse condition. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved, observed in this study and who had completed 6-month follow up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TofacitinibChange From Baseline in CDAI at 6 Months Follow-upAt baseline22.53 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.04
TofacitinibChange From Baseline in CDAI at 6 Months Follow-upAt 6 Months19.08 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.02
Primary

Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)

CDAI was a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the swollen joint counts (SJC), tender/painful joint counts (TJC), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) and physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA). CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher scores indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS); higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher scores indicated worse condition. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TofacitinibClinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)23.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.7
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitClinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)22.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Primary

Duration of Prior Rituximab (RTX) Use

Duration of prior RTX use (in months) was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TofacitinibDuration of Prior Rituximab (RTX) Use23.6 MonthsStandard Deviation 25.3
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitDuration of Prior Rituximab (RTX) Use22.8 MonthsStandard Deviation 24.6
Primary

Duration of Rheumatoid Arthritis at Index Date

Duration of rheumatoid arthritis in participants at the time of index date was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TofacitinibDuration of Rheumatoid Arthritis at Index Date17.5 YearsStandard Deviation 11
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitDuration of Rheumatoid Arthritis at Index Date18.2 YearsStandard Deviation 11.8
Primary

Fatigue VAS

Participants assessed their fatigue using a 0 to 100 mm VAS scale, where 0 mm = no fatigue and 100 mm = worst possible fatigue. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TofacitinibFatigue VAS58.3 MillimeterStandard Deviation 28.5
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitFatigue VAS57.3 MillimeterStandard Deviation 29.1
Primary

Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ)

mHAQ is the modified version of HAQ which simplifies it from 20 questions to 8 questions, which assessed the ability to perform tasks due to rheumatoid arthritis. It comprised of 8 questions on 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; grip; walk; hygiene; reach; and common activities over past week before specified time point. Eight items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, where 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total score ranged from 0 to 3, where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty, higher scores indicated worse functioning. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TofacitinibModified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ)1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitModified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ)1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Primary

Number of Participants According to Alcohol Use

Number of participants according to alcohol use were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here ''Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Alcohol UseNone/ less than (<)1 drink per week224 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Alcohol Use1-3 drinks per week52 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Alcohol Use1-2 drinks per day24 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Alcohol UseGreater than (>) 3 drinks per day1 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Alcohol UseGreater than (>) 3 drinks per day1 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Alcohol UseNone/ less than (<)1 drink per week171 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Alcohol Use1-2 drinks per day15 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Alcohol Use1-3 drinks per week35 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants According to CDAI Categories

Number of participants according to CDAI category were reported in this outcome measures. CDAI was simplified index for assessing disease activity comprising of SJC, TJC, PtGA and PGA. CDAI is numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher score indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; higher score indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher score indicated worse condition. Score range-Remission: CDAI less than or equal to (\<=) 2.8. Low Disease Activity: CDAI greater than (\>) 2.8 and \<= 10. Moderate Disease Activity: CDAI \> 10 and \<= 22. High Disease Activity: CDAI \> 22. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here ''Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to CDAI CategoriesLow (> 2.8 to <=10)53 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to CDAI CategoriesModerate (>10 to <= 22)84 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to CDAI CategoriesHigh (>22)156 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to CDAI CategoriesRemission (<= 2.8)17 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to CDAI CategoriesHigh (>22)111 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to CDAI CategoriesRemission (<= 2.8)13 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to CDAI CategoriesLow (> 2.8 to <=10)38 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to CDAI CategoriesModerate (>10 to <= 22)64 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants According to Concomitant Therapies

Number of participants classified according to concomitant therapies were reported in this outcome measure. One participant might have received more than one concomitant therapy. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Concomitant TherapiesMonotherapy147 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Concomitant TherapiesCombination with nonMTX csDMARD only55 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Concomitant TherapiesCombination with Methotrexate (MTX) only85 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Concomitant TherapiesCombination with MTX & nonMTX csDMARD31 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Concomitant TherapiesPrednisone112 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Concomitant TherapiesCombination with MTX & nonMTX csDMARD22 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Concomitant TherapiesPrednisone81 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Concomitant TherapiesMonotherapy103 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Concomitant TherapiesCombination with Methotrexate (MTX) only71 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Concomitant TherapiesCombination with nonMTX csDMARD only36 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants According to History of Comorbidities

Number of participants according to history of comorbidities were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib. One participant might have more than one history of comorbidities.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to History of ComorbiditiesMalignancy51 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to History of ComorbiditiesHypertension110 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to History of ComorbiditiesSerious Infection58 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to History of ComorbiditiesDiabetes mellitus43 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to History of ComorbiditiesTuberculosis (active or latent)2 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to History of ComorbiditiesInterstitial Lung Disease (ILD/Pulmonary Fibrosis)8 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to History of ComorbiditiesCardiovascular Disease136 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to History of ComorbiditiesInterstitial Lung Disease (ILD/Pulmonary Fibrosis)7 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to History of ComorbiditiesCardiovascular Disease106 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to History of ComorbiditiesMalignancy36 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to History of ComorbiditiesSerious Infection40 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to History of ComorbiditiesTuberculosis (active or latent)1 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to History of ComorbiditiesHypertension83 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to History of ComorbiditiesDiabetes mellitus30 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Rituximab Initiation

Number of participants were classified according to line of therapy in which Rituximab was initiated were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here ''Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Rituximab Initiation2 prior biologics (other biologic + Rituximab [RTX])33 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Rituximab Initiation3 prior biologics (2 other biologics + RTX)64 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Rituximab Initiation4 prior biologics (3 other biologic + RTX)98 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Rituximab Initiation2 prior biologics (other biologic + Rituximab [RTX])28 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Rituximab Initiation3 prior biologics (2 other biologics + RTX)50 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Rituximab Initiation4 prior biologics (3 other biologic + RTX)63 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Tofacitinib Initiation

Number of participants were classified according to line of therapy in which Tofacitinib was initiated and were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Tofacitinib Initiation3 prior biologics (RTX + 2 other biologics)18 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Tofacitinib Initiation2 prior biologics (Rituximab (RTX) + 1 other biologic)9 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Tofacitinib Initiation4 prior biologics (RTX + 3 other biologics)291 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Tofacitinib Initiation3 prior biologics (RTX + 2 other biologics)15 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Tofacitinib Initiation2 prior biologics (Rituximab (RTX) + 1 other biologic)9 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Tofacitinib Initiation4 prior biologics (RTX + 3 other biologics)208 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants According to Previous Drug Therapies With Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (csDMARD)

Number of participants according to previous drug therapies with csDMARD were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Previous Drug Therapies With Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (csDMARD)0 previous csDMARD7 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Previous Drug Therapies With Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (csDMARD)1 previous csDMARD69 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Previous Drug Therapies With Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (csDMARD)>= 2 previous csDMARD242 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Previous Drug Therapies With Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (csDMARD)0 previous csDMARD6 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Previous Drug Therapies With Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (csDMARD)1 previous csDMARD51 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Previous Drug Therapies With Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (csDMARD)>= 2 previous csDMARD175 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants According to Reason for Discontinuation of Rituximab

Number of participants were classified according to reasons for discontinuation of rituximab and were reported in this outcome measure. Reasons for discontinuation of rituximab included safety, effectiveness, insurance, participant doing well and other reasons. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here ''Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed only in tofacitinib group.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Reason for Discontinuation of RituximabEffectiveness60 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Reason for Discontinuation of RituximabPhysician Decision19 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Reason for Discontinuation of RituximabInsurance6 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Reason for Discontinuation of RituximabParticipant doing well5 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Reason for Discontinuation of RituximabOther Reasons19 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants According to Smoking Status

Number of participants according to smoking status was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here ''Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Smoking StatusNever smoker149 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Smoking StatusFormer smoker110 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Smoking StatusCurrent smoker55 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Smoking StatusNever smoker107 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Smoking StatusFormer smoker79 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Smoking StatusCurrent smoker42 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants According to Tofacitinib Initiation Year

Number of participants were classified according to year of tofacitinib initiation and were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Tofacitinib Initiation Year2014-201580 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Tofacitinib Initiation Year2018-201949 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Tofacitinib Initiation Year2016-201783 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Tofacitinib Initiation Year2020-202225 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Tofacitinib Initiation Year2012-201381 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Tofacitinib Initiation Year2020-202217 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Tofacitinib Initiation Year2012-201362 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Tofacitinib Initiation Year2014-201556 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Tofacitinib Initiation Year2016-201763 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Tofacitinib Initiation Year2018-201934 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants According to Type of Health Insurance Plan

Number of participants according to type of health insurance plan was reported in this outcome measure. The health insurance plan included private, Medicare, Medicaid and no insurance. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib. One participant might have more than one type of insurance.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Type of Health Insurance PlanPrivate210 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Type of Health Insurance PlanMedicare147 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Type of Health Insurance PlanMedicaid20 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Type of Health Insurance PlanNo Insurance4 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Type of Health Insurance PlanNo Insurance2 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Type of Health Insurance PlanPrivate153 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Type of Health Insurance PlanMedicaid15 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Type of Health Insurance PlanMedicare112 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants According to Work Status

Number of participants according to work status was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here ''Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Work StatusFull time84 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Work StatusPart time19 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Work StatusWork at home24 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Work StatusStudent1 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Work StatusDisabled83 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Work StatusRetired99 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Work StatusDisabled60 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Work StatusFull time65 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Work StatusStudent1 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Work StatusPart time14 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Work StatusRetired69 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Work StatusWork at home17 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations

Number of participants were classified according to year of rituximab discontinuations and were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here ''Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations2006-20077 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations2014-201556 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations2010-201142 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations2016-201737 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations2018-201918 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations2008-200920 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations2020-20228 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations2012-201371 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations2020-20226 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations2006-20076 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations2008-200914 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations2010-201130 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations2012-201352 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations2014-201541 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations2018-201911 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations2016-201727 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With College Graduation or Higher Education

Number of participants who were college graduate or had higher education were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here ''Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TofacitinibNumber of Participants With College Graduation or Higher Education206 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants With College Graduation or Higher Education152 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Domain Scores of 2 or Higher

EQ-5D-3L is a health profile questionnaire used to assess quality of life along 5 dimensions. Participants rated 5 aspects of health (walking, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) by choosing from 3 answering options (1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3=extreme problems). The mean of the summed score ranged from 1 to 3 with 1 corresponding to no problems and 3 corresponding to severe problems in the 5 dimensions, where higher score indicated more severe problems. In this outcome measure number of participants with a domain score of 2 or higher in each individual domain are reported. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TofacitinibNumber of Participants With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Domain Scores of 2 or HigherAnxiety and depression145 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Domain Scores of 2 or HigherWalking229 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Domain Scores of 2 or HigherSelf-care161 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Domain Scores of 2 or HigherUsual activities232 Participants
TofacitinibNumber of Participants With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Domain Scores of 2 or HigherPain and discomfort228 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Domain Scores of 2 or HigherPain and discomfort170 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Domain Scores of 2 or HigherUsual activities173 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Domain Scores of 2 or HigherWalking167 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Domain Scores of 2 or HigherAnxiety and depression99 Participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitNumber of Participants With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Domain Scores of 2 or HigherSelf-care123 Participants
Primary

Pain VAS

Pain VAS was assessed using 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal line to rate pain. Score ranged from 0 mm to 100 mm; where, 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TofacitinibPain VAS58.0 MillimeterStandard Deviation 27
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitPain VAS57.1 MillimeterStandard Deviation 26.6
Primary

Patient Global Assessment (PGA) VAS

PGA-VAS was used to assess disease activity; assessed on 0-100 millimeter (mm) VAS; higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TofacitinibPatient Global Assessment (PGA) VAS52.8 MillimeterStandard Deviation 25.8
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitPatient Global Assessment (PGA) VAS51.4 MillimeterStandard Deviation 25.6
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Rituximab

Percentage of participants who discontinued rituximab were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TofacitinibPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Rituximab34.3 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Rituximab0 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Used Rituximab (RTX) Directly Before Tofacitinib

Percentage of participants who used rituximab directly before tofacitinib were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TofacitinibPercentage of Participants Who Used Rituximab (RTX) Directly Before Tofacitinib36.9 Percentage of participants
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitPercentage of Participants Who Used Rituximab (RTX) Directly Before Tofacitinib36.4 Percentage of participants
Primary

Swollen Joint Count

Swollen joint count was used to measure the pain and inflammation in the joints. Based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, where higher scores indicated worse condition. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TofacitinibSwollen Joint Count5.5 Joint countStandard Deviation 5.2
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitSwollen Joint Count5.2 Joint countStandard Deviation 5
Primary

Tender Joint Count

Tender joint count was used to measure the pain and inflammation in the joints, based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, where higher scores indicated worse condition. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TofacitinibTender Joint Count8.6 Joint countStandard Deviation 8.1
Tofacitinib: Subset With 6-month VisitTender Joint Count8.3 Joint countStandard Deviation 7.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fatigue VAS at 6 Months Follow-up

Participants assessed their fatigue using a 0 to 100 mm VAS scale, where 0 mm = no fatigue and 100 mm = worst possible fatigue. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved, observed in this study and who had completed 6-month follow up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TofacitinibChange From Baseline in Fatigue VAS at 6 Months Follow-upAt baseline57.39 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.19
TofacitinibChange From Baseline in Fatigue VAS at 6 Months Follow-upAt 6 Months54.75 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at 6 Months Follow-up

HAQ: self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in RA. The 20-question instrument assessed ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 functional areas: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, griping, and conducting daily activities. Eight items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, where 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total score ranged from 0 to 3, where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty, higher scores indicating worse functioning. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved, observed in this study and who had completed 6-month follow up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TofacitinibChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at 6 Months Follow-upAt baseline1.35 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
TofacitinibChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at 6 Months Follow-upAt 6 Months1.28 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pain VAS at 6 Months Follow-up

Pain VAS was assessed using 100 mm horizontal line to rate pain. Score ranged from 0 mm to 100 mm; where, 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved, observed in this study and who had completed 6-month follow up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TofacitinibChange From Baseline in Pain VAS at 6 Months Follow-upAt baseline57.16 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.74
TofacitinibChange From Baseline in Pain VAS at 6 Months Follow-upAt 6 Months51.27 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.8
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) at 6 Month Follow Up

MCID improvement was assessed based on health assessment questionnaire (HAQ). HAQ: self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in RA. Assessed based on ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 categories: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and conducting daily activities. Eight items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, where 0= without any difficulty, 1= with some difficulty, 2= with much difficulty, and 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total score ranged from 0 to 3, where 0= least difficulty and 3= extreme difficulty, higher scores indicating worse functioning. Achievement of MCID for HAQ was defined as decrease in minimum of 0.22 units from baseline. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved, observed in this study and who had completed 6-month follow up visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TofacitinibPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) at 6 Month Follow Up28.6 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026