Skip to content

Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Use MD Tissue Collagen Medical Device in the Infiltrative Treatment of Greater Trochanter Pain Syndrome (GTPS)

Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Use of a Type I Collagen-based MD Tissue Collagen Medical Device in the Infiltrative Treatment of Greater Trochanter Pain Syndrome (GTPS) MEDANTRO PILOT STUDY

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05486078
Acronym
MEDANTRO
Enrollment
47
Registered
2022-08-03
Start date
2021-09-13
Completion date
2023-05-31
Last updated
2025-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gluteal Muscles, Gluteal Tendinitis, Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome, GTPS - Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome, Pertrochanteric Fracture, Tendon Disorder

Keywords

MD-Tissue Collagen Medical, Ecoguide, Biomechanical, Modified Harris Hip Score, Numeric Rating Scale, Type I collagen

Brief summary

Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome, also known as GTPS (Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome) is a complex clinical condition characterized by chronic and recurrent pain in the lateral region of the hip, near the greater trochanter of the femur. Biomechanical and anatomic-histologic interactions of the structures of the peri trochanteric space, in which, given the close anatomic-functional relationships, the origin can be traced to three different pathologic entities that may influence each other and fuel the progressive exacerbation of symptomatology. These are: external snap hip, trochanteric bursitis, and tendinopathies of the tendons of the gluteus mediums and gluteus minimums muscles. Recent studies regarding GTPS have shown that in most cases this condition is due to degenerative tendinopathy of the tendons of the gluteus minimums and gluteus mediums muscles. Tendinopathy is defined as a pathological condition associated with histological changes that may result in a change in the organization of collagen fibrils, relative increase in the percentage of proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycans, and no collagenous components of the ECM accompanied by neo-vascularization and inflammatory state. Tendinopathies thus result in painful symptomatology that very often also results in biomechanical functional deficit. Clinically, GTPS presents as pain that is often debilitating and exacerbated by activities such as walking, climbing stairs, and lying on the affected side at night, associated with a progressive loss of stenia in hip abduction movements. On objective examination, a point of tenderness (trigger point) is noted at the level of the region of the greater trochanter, which may radiate to the lumbar area and along the lateral aspect of the thigh to the ipsilateral knee and a difficulty on strength versus resistance tests in hip abduction movements. Although it is a very common syndrome, the treatment of painful grand trochanter syndrome, as well as that of tendinopathies in general, is still a major hurdle because the specific cellular pathogenetic and biomechanical etiopathogenetic mechanisms are still partly unknown and many treatments are empirical. Traditionally, the treatment of GTPS is initially conservative and includes rest, ice, NSAIDs and physiotherapy with stretching exercises of the fascia late. The use of corticosteroids, with systemic or local infiltrative intake, for the treatment of tendinopathies is highly controversial and, in any case, does not seem to have long-term efficacy. MD-Tissue Collagen Medical Device is an injectable medical device based on porcine collagen type I; the collagen content is 100µg/2mL. Porcine collagen is like human collagen and highly compatible; it has very low risks of inducing adverse effects and is therefore used in several clinical settings.

Detailed description

This is a pilot monocentric Clinical Investigation based on a One sample design. In the ex vivo study, MD-Tissue Collagen Medical Device was used as a substrate for cell cultures of human gluteal tenocytes on culture plates. The results suggest how MD-Tissue can induce an anabolic phenotype in tenocytes by stimulating their proliferation and migration; it would also be able to promote the synthesis, maturation, and secretion of COL-I, thereby promoting tendon homeostasis and repair. Specifically, the modification of gene expression and proteins involved in collagen turnover pathways were analyzed by real-time PCR, Slot blot and SDS-zymography. Data from the study showed that tenocytes cultured with MD-Tissue compared with controls exhibited increased secretion and migration of COL-1 increased mRNA levels of the matrix metalloprotease inhibitor proteins MMP-1 and TIMP-1. The tenocytes used for the cell cultures were gluteal tenocytes, derived from human gluteal tendon fragments (obtained from subjects without any tendon pathology who had undergone total hip replacement surgery); therefore, it is reasonable to think that the porcine type I collagen-based compound may be a viable treatment in GTPS. The results of the preclinical study suggest how MD-Tissue Collagen Medical Device can induce an anabolic phenotype in tenocytes by stimulating tenocyte proliferation and COL-I synthesis, maturation, and secretion, thereby promoting tendon repair. As these effects have been evaluated ex vivo on tenocytes of gluteal muscle tendons, the purpose of this study is to evaluate its efficacy in local infiltrative treatment, in the pertechnetic region, of GTPS, in terms of resolution of pain symptoms and recovery of stenia in abduction. Variables will be assessed at 6 different times; at baseline (day 0), after week 1, weeks 2, weeks 6, weeks 10 and after weeks 24.

Interventions

DEVICEMD Tissue Collagen Medical Device

The Experimental Group will be treated with 2-mL volume ultrasound-guided infiltration of: MD-Tissue (GUNA, Milan-Italy). Composition for 2 ml: collagen 100 micrograms Subjects will be treated with No.1 infiltration per week for 3 consecutive weeks. The infiltrations will be performed in an echoguided mode. MD-Tissue Collagen Medical Device will be infiltrated into the trochanteric bursa and at the level of the tendons of the gluteus minimus and gluteus medius, particularly at the level of the most degenerated insertional areas.

Sponsors

Guna S.p.a
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

One sample study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female subjects aged 18 to 70 years; * subjects with lateral palpatory pain that has appeared for at least 1 month; * subjects with hip pain symptomatology assessed by Numerical rating scale (NRS) ≥ to 5; * Subjects able to cooperate for the assessments in the Survey plan; * subjects able to understand and sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* subjects with true coxalgia (with positive FADDIR); * subjects with ESHS (external snap hip syndrome); * subjects already undergoing candidate hip replacement surgery; * subjects with radiologic and clinical evidence of small and/or middle gluteal tendon detachment with indication for surgical repair; * subjects with evidence of radiographically documented tendon calcifications; * subjects with a degree of coxarthrosis of the hip that is a candidate for treatment according to the classification of Tonnis\>1 * subjects who have taken fluoroquinolones within 30 days prior to enrollment * subjects who have undergone treatment with hyaluronic acid or corticosteroids in the hip candidate for infiltrative treatment within 4 weeks before enrollment; * subjects with local infections of the treatment candidate hip or systemic infections, osteomyelitis, or sepsis; * subjects on chronic treatment with corticosteroids or immunosuppressants; * subjects who are drug addicts, alcoholics, have psychiatric disorders, or have clinical conditions that may compromise the correct interpretation of PROMs or follow-up; * subjects with coagulopathies, platelet aggregation disorders, or on treatment with oral anticoagulants or antiplatelets that cannot be discontinued during the study period; * Pregnant and lactating subjects (female subjects of childbearing age should be tested for pregnancy before enrollment); * subjects with allergy to porcine collagen.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) Pain Score From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 10weeks 10Pain intensity was measured using the NRS (Numerical Rating Scale), a validated scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Participants were asked to indicate their pain level at baseline (Week 0) and at Week 10. A change of at least 3 points on the NRS is considered clinically significant. The primary outcome is the mean change in NRS score from baseline to Week 10.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) From Baseline to Weeks 6, 10, and 24Weeks 6, 10, and 24The Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) is a validated tool for assessing hip function and pain. It ranges from 0 (worst functional outcome and highest pain) to 100 (best function and least pain). Participants were evaluated at Weeks 6, 10, and 24 compared to baseline. The change in total score is used to assess clinical improvement. Unit of Measure: Score from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better outcome
Change in Hip Abduction Strength From Baseline to Weeks 6, 10, and 24Weeks 6, 10, and 24Hip abduction strength was assessed using a handheld dynamometer at Weeks 6, 10, and 24. The measurement was performed with the patient standing on the contralateral (healthy) limb, while abducting the hip affected by GTPS. For each assessment, three consecutive measurements were taken and averaged. Results were compared to baseline (Day 0) to evaluate functional improvement in muscular strength.
Mean NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) Pain Score at Week 6 and Week 24 Compared to Baseline (T0)weeks 6 and weeks 24Pain intensity was measured using the NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) at rest, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Participants were asked to rate their pain at baseline (T0), week 6 (T6w/FU), and week 24 (T24w/FU). This outcome reports the mean NRS values at week 6 and 24. Higher scores indicate more intense pain.
Change in Analgesic Drug Consumption (Paracetamol and/or Celecoxib) From Baseline to Week 24Week 1, Week 2, Week 6, Week 10, and Week 24 compared to baseline (Week 0) Week 1, Week 2, Week 6, Week 10, and Week 24 compared to baseline (Week 0) Week 1, Week 2, Week 6, Week 10, and Week 24 compared to baseline (Week 0)Analgesic drug consumption (paracetamol and/or celecoxib) was recorded using a patient diary at time points T0 (baseline), T1w, T2w, T6w/FU, T10w/FU, and T24w/FU. Each patient logged the number of analgesic doses consumed per week. The total number of doses per timepoint was used to assess any significant change over time. The analysis aimed to evaluate whether the treatment reduced the need for pain medication, as an indirect marker of clinical efficacy. Unit of measure: Number of analgesic doses consumed per week.
Incidence of Adverse Events (AE, SAE, SUSAR) From Baseline to Week 24Day 0 to Week 24Adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs) were monitored at each study visit from baseline (Day 0) to Week 24. Data were collected via systematic interviews and clinical assessments. No adverse events of any type were reported during the study. AE definitions followed ICH-GCP and ClinicalTrials.gov guidance.
MRI Evaluation of Inflammatory and Degenerative Signs in the Peritrochanteric Region at Week 24 Compared to BaselineWeek 24 compared to baseline (Week 0)MRI evaluation focused on inflammatory and degenerative signs in the peritrochanteric region (gluteus medius/minimus tendons) was conducted at Week 24 and compared to baseline (Week 0). Two independent radiologists assessed peri-tendinous fluid and intra-tendinous edema on STIR-weighted images. Improvement was defined as visible reduction in peritendinous edema. The analysis was qualitative and dichotomous (Improved vs. Unchanged).

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MD-Tissue Medical Device
MD Tissue Collagen Medical Device: The Experimental Group will be treated with 2-mL volume ultrasound-guided infiltration of: MD-Tissue (GUNA, Milan-Italy). Composition for 2 ml: collagen 100 micrograms Subjects will be treated with No.1 infiltration per week for 3 consecutive weeks. The infiltrations will be performed in an echoguided mode. MD-Tissue Collagen Medical Device will be infiltrated into the trochanteric bursa and at the level of the tendons of the gluteus minimus and gluteus medius, particularly at the level of the most degenerated insertional areas.
47
Total47

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall Study4 drop out and one withdrawn5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMD-Tissue Medical Device
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
47 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 43
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Change in NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) Pain Score From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 10

Pain intensity was measured using the NRS (Numerical Rating Scale), a validated scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Participants were asked to indicate their pain level at baseline (Week 0) and at Week 10. A change of at least 3 points on the NRS is considered clinically significant. The primary outcome is the mean change in NRS score from baseline to Week 10.

Time frame: weeks 10

Population: All variables will be subjected to the appropriate descriptive analyses after validation of the input data. Continuous variables: mean ± standard deviation or median and range, depending on the distribution; categorical variables: absolute and relative frequency tables.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceChange in NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) Pain Score From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 104.7 NRS Pain Score (range 0-10; higher score
Secondary

Change in Analgesic Drug Consumption (Paracetamol and/or Celecoxib) From Baseline to Week 24

Analgesic drug consumption (paracetamol and/or celecoxib) was recorded using a patient diary at time points T0 (baseline), T1w, T2w, T6w/FU, T10w/FU, and T24w/FU. Each patient logged the number of analgesic doses consumed per week. The total number of doses per timepoint was used to assess any significant change over time. The analysis aimed to evaluate whether the treatment reduced the need for pain medication, as an indirect marker of clinical efficacy. Unit of measure: Number of analgesic doses consumed per week.

Time frame: Week 1, Week 2, Week 6, Week 10, and Week 24 compared to baseline (Week 0) Week 1, Week 2, Week 6, Week 10, and Week 24 compared to baseline (Week 0) Week 1, Week 2, Week 6, Week 10, and Week 24 compared to baseline (Week 0)

Population: All participants who returned complete analgesic diaries at each visit (Weeks 1, 2, 6, 10, and 24) were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceChange in Analgesic Drug Consumption (Paracetamol and/or Celecoxib) From Baseline to Week 24Week 11.6 Units of analgesics consumed (number ofStandard Deviation 1.8
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceChange in Analgesic Drug Consumption (Paracetamol and/or Celecoxib) From Baseline to Week 24Week 20.8 Units of analgesics consumed (number ofStandard Deviation 1.4
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceChange in Analgesic Drug Consumption (Paracetamol and/or Celecoxib) From Baseline to Week 24Week 60.5 Units of analgesics consumed (number ofStandard Deviation 1.2
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceChange in Analgesic Drug Consumption (Paracetamol and/or Celecoxib) From Baseline to Week 24Week 100.3 Units of analgesics consumed (number ofStandard Deviation 0.9
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceChange in Analgesic Drug Consumption (Paracetamol and/or Celecoxib) From Baseline to Week 24Week 240.7 Units of analgesics consumed (number ofStandard Deviation 2.6
Comparison: Analgesic use (units/week) was analyzed over time using the Friedman test for repeated measures. No significant variation across follow-up visits was found.p-value: 0.992Friedman Test Within-group
Secondary

Change in Hip Abduction Strength From Baseline to Weeks 6, 10, and 24

Hip abduction strength was assessed using a handheld dynamometer at Weeks 6, 10, and 24. The measurement was performed with the patient standing on the contralateral (healthy) limb, while abducting the hip affected by GTPS. For each assessment, three consecutive measurements were taken and averaged. Results were compared to baseline (Day 0) to evaluate functional improvement in muscular strength.

Time frame: Weeks 6, 10, and 24

Population: All patients who completed dynamometric testing at all timepoints (T0, T6, T10, T24) were included in the per-protocol analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceChange in Hip Abduction Strength From Baseline to Weeks 6, 10, and 24Row Title Number Analyzed Mean SD T05.538 Force in kg measured by handheld dynamomStandard Deviation 2.8413
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceChange in Hip Abduction Strength From Baseline to Weeks 6, 10, and 24T66.045 Force in kg measured by handheld dynamomStandard Deviation 2.4797
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceChange in Hip Abduction Strength From Baseline to Weeks 6, 10, and 24T10w6.676 Force in kg measured by handheld dynamomStandard Deviation 3.0115
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceChange in Hip Abduction Strength From Baseline to Weeks 6, 10, and 24T24w6.851 Force in kg measured by handheld dynamomStandard Deviation 2.9481
Comparison: Hip abduction strength was analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. The assumption of sphericity was tested and Bonferroni correction was applied for pairwise comparisons. A p-value \< 0.001 was considered statistically significant.p-value: 0.001ANOVA
Secondary

Change in Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) From Baseline to Weeks 6, 10, and 24

The Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) is a validated tool for assessing hip function and pain. It ranges from 0 (worst functional outcome and highest pain) to 100 (best function and least pain). Participants were evaluated at Weeks 6, 10, and 24 compared to baseline. The change in total score is used to assess clinical improvement. Unit of Measure: Score from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better outcome

Time frame: Weeks 6, 10, and 24

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceChange in Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) From Baseline to Weeks 6, 10, and 24T0 (Baseline)57.09 Score from 0 to 100; higher scores indicStandard Deviation 13.78
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceChange in Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) From Baseline to Weeks 6, 10, and 24T6w71.22 Score from 0 to 100; higher scores indicStandard Deviation 11.92
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceChange in Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) From Baseline to Weeks 6, 10, and 24T10w72.53 Score from 0 to 100; higher scores indicStandard Deviation 12.26
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceChange in Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) From Baseline to Weeks 6, 10, and 24T24w73.19 Score from 0 to 100; higher scores indicStandard Deviation 12.74
Secondary

Incidence of Adverse Events (AE, SAE, SUSAR) From Baseline to Week 24

Adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs) were monitored at each study visit from baseline (Day 0) to Week 24. Data were collected via systematic interviews and clinical assessments. No adverse events of any type were reported during the study. AE definitions followed ICH-GCP and ClinicalTrials.gov guidance.

Time frame: Day 0 to Week 24

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceIncidence of Adverse Events (AE, SAE, SUSAR) From Baseline to Week 24All-Cause Mortality0 participants
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceIncidence of Adverse Events (AE, SAE, SUSAR) From Baseline to Week 24Serious Adverse Events0 participants
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceIncidence of Adverse Events (AE, SAE, SUSAR) From Baseline to Week 24Other (Non-Serious) Adverse Events0 participants
Secondary

Mean NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) Pain Score at Week 6 and Week 24 Compared to Baseline (T0)

Pain intensity was measured using the NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) at rest, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Participants were asked to rate their pain at baseline (T0), week 6 (T6w/FU), and week 24 (T24w/FU). This outcome reports the mean NRS values at week 6 and 24. Higher scores indicate more intense pain.

Time frame: weeks 6 and weeks 24

Population: All variables were subjected to the appropriate descriptive analyses after validation of the input data. Continuous variables were analyzed as mean ± standard deviation or median and range, depending on the distribution. Categorical variables were summarized as absolute and relative frequency tables.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceMean NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) Pain Score at Week 6 and Week 24 Compared to Baseline (T0)NRS Week 242.5 score on a scale
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceMean NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) Pain Score at Week 6 and Week 24 Compared to Baseline (T0)NRS Week 64.5 score on a scale
Secondary

MRI Evaluation of Inflammatory and Degenerative Signs in the Peritrochanteric Region at Week 24 Compared to Baseline

MRI evaluation focused on inflammatory and degenerative signs in the peritrochanteric region (gluteus medius/minimus tendons) was conducted at Week 24 and compared to baseline (Week 0). Two independent radiologists assessed peri-tendinous fluid and intra-tendinous edema on STIR-weighted images. Improvement was defined as visible reduction in peritendinous edema. The analysis was qualitative and dichotomous (Improved vs. Unchanged).

Time frame: Week 24 compared to baseline (Week 0)

Population: Patients who underwent MRI evaluation both at baseline and at Week 24 were included in the analysis (n=40).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MD Tissue Collagen Medical DeviceMRI Evaluation of Inflammatory and Degenerative Signs in the Peritrochanteric Region at Week 24 Compared to Baseline40 Participants with MRI improvement
Comparison: MRI improvement was assessed using paired evaluation of inflammatory signs (edema) at baseline and Week 24. McNemar exact test was used for within-subject categorical comparison.p-value: <0.0001McNemar

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026