Skip to content

BIOSTEMI Extended Survival

Randomized Multicenter Comparison Between Ultrathin-strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimuseluting Stents and Durable Polymer Everolimus-eluting Stents for Patients With Acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05484310
Acronym
BIOSTEMI ES
Enrollment
1300
Registered
2022-08-02
Start date
2021-10-15
Completion date
2023-10-28
Last updated
2023-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome, Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, Long-term outcomes, Primary PCI

Brief summary

The objective of the BIOSTEMI ES study is to assess the long-term clinical outcomes with the Orsiro ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent compared to the Xience thin-strut durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent up to 5 years of follow-up among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, enrolled in the BIOSTEMI trial.

Detailed description

The objective of the BIOSTEMI ES study is to assess the long-term clinical outcomes with the Orsiro ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent compared to the Xience thin-strut durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent up to 5 years of follow-up among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, enrolled in the BIOSTEMI trial. * In the BIOSTEMI randomized controlled clinical trial, the Orsiro ultrathin-strut bio degradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent was found superior to the best-in-class Xience thin-strut durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent with respect to target lesion failure at one-year follow-up among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI (Iglesias JF, et al., Lancet 2019). The difference was driven by a lower risk of clinically indicated target lesion revascularization with the Orsiro ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent compared to the Xience thin-strut durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent. * Importantly, the difference between Orsiro stent and Xience stent accrues over time between one and two years of follow-up. * As per study protocol, the planned follow-up of patients included in the BIOSTEMI randomized controlled trial was 2 years. * The long-term clinical benefits the Orsiro ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent over the Xience thin-strut durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent beyond the polymer degradation period remain uncertain.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Geneva
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects that were enrolled in the BIOSTEMI trial (BASEC: 2016-00555), * Subject willing and able to provide oral informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* No specific

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Target lesion failure, composite of cardiac death, target vessel (Q-wave or non-Q-wave) myocardial re-infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization5 years of follow-upClinical assessment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Definite/probable stent thrombosis5 years of follow-upClinical assessment
Cardiac death5 years of follow-upClinical assessment
Clinically indicated and not clinically indicated target vessel revascularization5 years of follow-upClinical assessment
All-cause death5 years of follow-upClinical assessment
Definite stent thrombosis5 years of follow-upClinical assessment
Any revascularization5 years of follow-upClinical assessment
Target vessel failure, composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial re-infarction, or clinically indicated target vessel revascularization5 years of follow-upClinical assessment
Any myocardial infarction (Q-wave and non-Q-wave)5 years of follow-upClinical assessment
Clinically indicated and not clinically indicated target lesion revascularization5 years of follow-upClinical assessment
Target vessel myocardial re-infarction5 years of follow-upClinical assessment

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026